Pot use in Colorado can still get you fired
A court says companies can terminate employees for legal medical or recreational marijuana use because it remains illegal under federal law.
The Colorado Court of Appeals just harshed everyone's buzz on Friday, when it ruled 2-1 that there's no employment protection for medical marijuana users in the state because the federal government still considers the drug illegal. That's bad news for Brandon Coats of Englewood, Colo., a former Dish Network (DISH) phone operator who opened the case by suing for wrongful termination after failing a company drug test in 2010.
Coats was paralyzed in a car crash as a teenager and has been a medical marijuana patient in the state since 2009. Dish Network actually never claimed Coats was impaired on the job. This follows a Washington state Supreme Court ruling that found workers can be fired for using marijuana, even if authorized by the state's medical marijuana law. But these rulings only further muddle the national patchwork of medical and recreational marijuana usage and drug-testing laws.
The number of American workers who are unemployed because they can't pass a drug test has risen 5.7% since 2007. While marijuana is the most common drug found in employee testing, it showed up in only 68,000 of the 3.4 million drug tests conducted last year.
Still, employers have been loath to let even medicinal marijuana use slide, citing federal law. In September, an appeals court ruled that a Wal-Mart (WMT) in Battle Creek, Mich., had the legal right to fire an employee who was prescribed medical marijuana for his cancer and inoperable brain tumor.
Colorado's Amendment 64 already allowed employers to ban marijuana in the workplace and implement policies restricting their employees' cannabis use. The latest ruling just knocks down the protection for marijuana use as a legal, off-duty activity. That puts increasingly progressive Colorado at odds with typically conservative Arizona, where workers cannot be terminated for lawfully using medical marijuana, unless it would jeopardize an employer's federal licensing or contracts.
There's a chance Colorado could consider a similar workaround in the future, but right now its medical marijuana users are facing the same issues as its 420 partygoers. What they're doing is "legal," but it's not yet legal.
So lets look at a potential scenario. John Doe goes to work and does a great job. He's always on time, always produces, never a ****, never intoxicated on the job, well liked by others. Why does anyone want to make him take a piss test?
1. drug testing provides a Tax incentive for the company?
2. Family member of the boss needs a job?
3. Employee has a pony tail?
4. Someone has a vested interest in ratting out John Doe?
Drug testing is an invasion of privacy and, JUST LIKE WHEN AND HOW MARIJUANA WAS MADE ILLEGAL - NOBODY VOTED ON THE SUBJECT.
Its a bullsh!t law in the first place, based on racism and greed.
It's funny how alcohol prohibition lasted only 10 years. That's because alcohol fuels violence and if booze had stayed illegal much longer, there would have been a civil war.
But pot smokers are never a violent bunch, and thus they pose no threat to the corrupt laws which they are forced to submit. 78 years and counting folks......when is your civil war going to happen?
It's sad that issues like gun control and gay marraige get more attention than the greatest social injustice since slavery - marijuana prohibition.
It is sad when we make laws that contradict each other and the average citizen is in the middle. What struck me most was the part about Walmart FIRING someone who was smoking (medically) because he had inoperable BRAIN TUMOR and CANCER. Wow...... where is the humanity in all of this?
First off if you understood what our country is all about it is about State rights, the right of the states to govern themselves, not to have the rights of their citizens trumped by the Federal government. You are right that federal law trumps state law, but it is a broken system in this aspect.
Laws which criminalize the use of marihuana are from a time when racist elements ruled the country, as well as special interests to keep hemp off the retail market.
There is no scientific evidence linking marijuana to any health risk, dangers or death. Just the opposite is found by scientists in Israel, where the plant has been studied for years and other countries for its medicinal properties.
Besides this "War on Drugs," which has cost you, me and our children's children hundreds of millions of dollars and resulted in our nation being the only one to have over 1,000,000 of its citizens locked up, for what gain?
U people suck!! I get the comment about firing the acohol users too, because only people who haven't smoked pot or have completely been brainwashed by propaganda see a difference. If you treat pot the same as alcohol, ie. don't drive under the influence, work under the influence, and general public rules/laws used for alcohol - no problem.
But UNFORTUNATELY until they come up with a test that shows a person is currently under the influence of pot - it's not the same. A breathelizer show how much you are under the influence of alcohol at that moment, the test for marijuana shows if you done it in the last week. NOT THE SAME!
So Like the first guy said, you could be a model employee and never be under the influence of pot on the job.... take the test and get fired. If it did work like that for alcohol.... there'd be a lot of job openings!!
Can you be fired for so called legal drugs? People need medication at different times of the day, what can you do?
Hey have you seen Frank? Frank? Oh you won’t being seeing Frank anymore! What happened? About 11:00 o’clock this morning he was racing down the center isle on the Forklift. He was really moving and singing at the top of his lungs *Born to be wild and smoking a joint. He went off the loading flipped the lift and the counter weight came down on him. Is he alright? I don’t think so” they took him to the hospital in a coffee cup.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
A basic income policy can actually ensure a decent standard of living for everyone.
- People left $500,000 in coins at airports last year
- How your driving can affect your credit
- Obamacare projected to cost hundreds of billions less
- November jobs report: Winners and losers
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
[BRIEFING.COM] A solid November employment report translated into a solid day of gains for the major averages. While there was some talk that the encouraging job growth raised the odds of the Fed announcing a tapering at its December meeting, the message of the markets today was either that it didn't believe there would be a tapering this month or that it doesn't fear a tapering this month.
It was just one day, yet there was ample meaning wrapped up in the connection that the 10-yr ... More
More Market News
The Fed may start tapering in just a few months. Here are a few of the likely winners and losers.