Budweiser's darker, more flavorful twin

A small Czech brewery has made its own version of Budweiser for centuries. Anheuser-Busch InBev is not happy about sharing the name, however.

By Jason Notte Dec 18, 2012 2:25PM

Image: Beer (Corbis)For more than 100 years, what the world's beer drinkers recognized as Budweiser depended largely on where they were standing. That won't change anytime soon now that talks over exclusive use of the name have collapsed.

Global megabrewer Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) wants the world to know Budweiser as the U.S. does: A pale, Clydesdale-pulled, multi-packaged light lager that permeates every aspect of adult culture and is nearly inescapable if you're attempting to buy a beer. The Budejovicky Budvar brewery in Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, wants to keep its Budweiser name associated with its town, its brewery and its darker, more flavorful lager. The former wants the name for brand consistency, the latter says the name is the primary reason it exists.

Before exclusivity talks broke down, the courts have been siding with the relatively little Czech brewery. Though Budejovicky Budvar produced 279 million pints of Budweiser last year to A-B's 73.9 billion and brought in revenue of $101 million in 2011 compared to InBev's $39 billion, Budvar has won 88 of 124 lawsuits against Anheuser-Busch over the past 11 years. Though A-B InBev has the rights to the Budweiser name in roughly 80 countries, Budvar still has exclusive rights to Budweiser in 68 countries, mostly in Europe, including beer-loving Germany.

So how did we get here? Much as the U.S. embraced baseball when the rest of the world took up soccer, history's disparate paths on each side of the Atlantic made Budweiser mean many things to many people. Budweiser was born in 1795 at the Budweiser Burgerbrau brewery in Ceske Budejovice and hit U.S. shores as an export in the early 1870s. The founders of Anheuser-Busch liked the style so much that they built their own beer around it and began selling it as Budweiser in the U.S. in 1876.

That became a bit of a problem in 1895, when Budweiser Burgerbrau became a house brewery for German royals and Budejovice's citzens founded Budejovicky Budvar to keep the Budweiser name in town. International legal wrangling between the three brewers began in 1906, but came to a settlements in 1907 and 1939 that allowed Anheuser-Busch to use the Budweiser name in North and Central America.

A-B has never been happy about this, but has been thwarted in various attempts at using the Budweiser name exclusively. In 2000, Britain allowed both A-B and Budvar to use the Budweiser trademark om the United Kingdom, stating that drinkers could see the clear difference between the two. That decision was upheld this summer as an appeals court refused to overturn Budvar's trademark.

Anheuser-Busch briefly tried to market Budvar's Budweiser in the U.S. as Czechvar in the mid-2000s to curry favor with the Czech brewer, but to no avail. The European Union took this line of thinking a step further in 2009, when it rejected A-B's application for a Europe-wide trademark on Budweiser. Today, the trademark dispute is the subject of 61 lawsuits in 11 countries.

The stakes are high on both sides. While Budvar's hold on Budweiser in beer-swilling European markets is somewhat disconcerting to A-B InBev, the big brewer can work around it with its huge portfolio of other brands including Stella Artois and Becks. That's a bit tougher in growing beer markets like Japan, Korea and China, where Budvar owns rights to A-B's best-known brand. A-B wants to unleash Budweiser everywhere, but that's a tough proposition when you can't even control what's on the label.

Budvar, meanwhile, has reason to fear what may happen if its native Bohemia loses exclusive rights to Budweiser. Fellow big Czech brewer Staropramen fell into InBev's hands in 2000, was sold to a private equity firm in 2009 and was just picked up by MolsonCoors (TAP) in April. With Budvar's international growth already stifled thanks to its Bud battle with A-B InBev, its Budweiser exclusivity may be the only thing preventing it from becoming just the latest small brewery snatched up by the big brewing conglomerates.

The Brits have a point, however. If you're a beer drinker in St. Louis used to light, refreshing, canned fare, you'd never reach for the darker, more complex Budvar or Czechvar. Meanwhile, beer pilgrims in Prague would be loathe to pick a yellow, fizzy American Bud over a big glass of the browner brew sitting before them at a beer hall. Unfortunately, brewmasters and beer companies seldom see it the same way, which is why drinkers will still want to check your passport stamp before ordering a Bud when far from home.

More from Money Now

Dec 19, 2012 9:26AM
American Crudweiser is crap and shouldn't even be classified as beer. There are so many better beers in the US and don't understand why people will buy this watered down stuff. Talk about a waste of money.
Dec 19, 2012 9:22AM
Bad sub-headline. It should read "A-B stole the name "Budweiser" in the 19th Century and InBev does not want to give it back"
Dec 19, 2012 7:02AM
American Budweiser is terrible beer; it is like an outhouse near a stream (pissing close to water).
Dec 19, 2012 3:00AM
Those of you that are putting Bud down should check your taste buds. Bud is the best beer on the market. I realize that we all have different taste. Why put down what you don't drink anyway? 
Dec 19, 2012 12:56AM
It Helped My Brother Die.  Alcohol  is fun at first then takes over and Ruins Lives.
Dec 18, 2012 10:45PM
Anheuser Busch stole the name, and now they are upset that the original still uses the name.  How pathetic is that?  

So, Anheuser Busch is upset that a Czech beer brewer has been using the name Budweiser since 1795?  Why would anyone be upset that someone is using the Bud wiper (if you know what I mean) name?  

Dec 18, 2012 9:57PM
Budweiser is crap, this story tastes just as good.
Dec 18, 2012 8:40PM
Why not just market Budweiser as Bud in other parts of the world, since that's what most American's call Budweiser.
Dec 18, 2012 8:31PM

American Bud is huge because of years of successful marketing efforts from way back when (who doesn't like Ed McMahon and Clydesdales?)  I don't know if it's the "beechwood" aging but I find it has a bizarre cidery taste that makes me want to puke.  Budvar (Czechvar in the U.S.) is really good but I'd take Pilsner Urquell, Lion or a bunch of German beers instead.

Dec 18, 2012 8:21PM
To all you whiners about how bad bud is, remember they are in the top 3 most sold beers in America. Somebody's drinking it. And last i checked nobody is forcing you to buy it either.
Dec 18, 2012 7:59PM

They stole the name from the Czechs and they stole the eagle from Yuengling.  Who did they steal the bad beer from?????


Dec 18, 2012 7:43PM

Couple of Misconceptions on beer and the one that I've learned is that good beer should be drank at room temp in order to really savor the taste.  Ever drink a warm Milwaukee.
  Next is that after the first two they all will taste the same if they are really cold. No so for Microbrews which has a distinction all their own, and as an Austrailian once told me when he is in America, he will usually buy the cheapest, because they're all horrible.  Slante



Dec 18, 2012 7:43PM

please shut budweiser and miller lite down! making people drink that swill should be illegal! notice there commericals have nothing to do

with the real taste of their beer? bud light is worse than miller lite but they are both skanky! Sam Adams best american beer period!

Dec 18, 2012 7:32PM
Budvar makes the American Budweiser taste like waste water, I will take quality over quantity anytime.
Dec 18, 2012 7:26PM

All these mega brands are making millions and millions of dollars....they  must be charging way to much for their products. We  need to support smaller independent manufactures....time to spread the capitalism and stop the monopolization.

Dec 18, 2012 7:23PM
This sounds like such a great marketing and distribution opportunity for In-Bev.  If they could work out an agreement with Budvar to allow InBev to market and distribute their beer as "Budweiser Dark" in the U.S., it could compensate for the loss of marketshare of the U.S. Budweiser market and provide a tastier European alternative that would appeal to those turning to microbrews.

Of course In-Bev is too big to consider this, and Budvar is probably too proud to be associated with In-Bev, especially after all of the lawsuits.  
Dec 18, 2012 7:17PM
bud-------never could drink that dish water
Dec 18, 2012 6:46PM
Likewise Anheuser-Busch sued Yuengling for exclusive rights to the eagle logo. Bud lost that one, too. The Judge is alledged to have told Bud's attorneys that they were "risking all", since it was proven that Yuengling had used the logo for decades before Bud "borrowed" it.
Dec 18, 2012 6:36PM
The Czech beer wouldn't have to be very good at all to be better than "American" Budweiser.  Of course, that's not saying much.  Stagnant pond water would be better too.
Dec 18, 2012 6:04PM
If ya cant put a flame to it after twisting, Its wrong kind of BUDZ to Enjoy !
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

Trending NOW

What’s this?


[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished an upbeat week on a mixed note. The S&P 500 shed less than a point, ending the week higher by 1.3%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.1%) cemented a 1.7% advance for the week. High-beta names underperformed, which weighed on the Nasdaq Composite (-0.3%) and the Russell 2000 (-1.3%).

Equity indices displayed strength in the early going with the S&P 500 tagging the 2,019 level during the opening 30 minutes of the action. However, ... More