The world's top 25 airports? Not 1 in the US
Global travelers have voted -- and the results have President Obama and others much chagrined.
Flying commercial airlines in the U.S. isn't fun anymore, and it really hasn't been for decades. It's not just the flights -- the whole airport experience is something most travelers simply endure as they cope with lengthy security lines and overused facilities.
Just last week President Barack Obama lamented the poor state of America's airports and how their deterioration affects the nation's long-term competitiveness. He noted that, according to a newly released list of the the world's top 100 airports, "there was not a single U.S. airport that came in the top 25, not one. Not one U.S. airport was considered by the experts and consumers who use these airports to be in the top 25 in the world."
The survey the president referred to was the World Airport Awards, conducted annually by U.K.-based Skytrax.
The awards are based on survey responses from more than 12 million airline customers from 108 nations at nearly 400 airports worldwide. The independent study evaluates a traveler's experience across nearly 40 factors, including check-in, security, immigration, airport shopping, gate departures and other categories.
For the record, here are the top 10 airports on the Skytrax 2013 survey of the world's 100 best, along with their rankings for 2012 (in parentheses):
Changi Airport, Singapore (2)
Incheon International, South Korea (1)
Schiphol Airport, Amsterdam (4)
Hong Kong International (3)
Beijing Capital International (5)
Munich Airport (6)
Zurich Airport (7)
Vancouver International (9)
Haneda Airport (Tokyo International) (14)
London Heathrow (11)
The top-ranked U.S. airports were Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International at No. 30, followed by Denver at 36, San Francisco at 40 and Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson at 48.
But some experts and analysts say those results should be taken with a big bag of salt. In his blog at Slate.com, Matthew Yglesias says the Skytrax survey "doesn't appear to be particularly rigorous or scientific in its sampling."
And Angela Gittens, director general of the industry trade group Airport Councils International, believes airport comparisons by a global group of travelers are bound to be uneven.
"Major international hubs in the U.S. are sometimes hampered by long immigration and security queues," she told PolitiFact, "which would hurt their rankings in comparison to an airport with primarily domestic service, such as Cincinnati."
Gittens also noted that compared with most American facilities, national governments in many countries "see their airports as key assets for their economic vitality and strive to make the visitor's journey through the airport as smooth as possible."
Skytrax appeared to agree that some of the results hinge on issues of comfort, like the overall treatment of travelers, rather than factors like waiting times.
One of the most prominent sections of the survey, Skytrax spokesman Peter Miller told PolitiFact, deals with customer service, staffing and convenience. "These are the issues that are of prime importance to travelers," he said, "and which cause the biggest distinction between airports worldwide."
So while U.S. airports may get the job done, most travelers agree they're no fun to visit.
I travel a lot internationally and most US airports look like they are from a 3rd world country.
This is a surprise? Seems to be part of a pattern. Forget about 3rd world airports, we're becoming a 3rd world country; our roads, bridges, etc. are disasters waiting to happen. Mass transit is a joke. Corruption and waste is rampant in both the public and private sectors. (yes I do get a kick out of those who insist that the private sector can solve all our problems. If you don't think monumental waste and inefficiency exists in corporate America, I might have a bridge to sell you.) Ever call customer service; ("press 1 to hear us laugh or 2 to get disconnected") or a help desk? (did they speak english?) And then we have the monkeys ... aka TSA agents (with apologies to the monkeys) who spend their time (and our tax dollars) patting down 4 year olds in strollers and 85 year old grandmothers in wheelchairs. You can make more money flipping burgers at Mickey D's ... and you expect competence? Shall I continue ...?
We in the USA airports deal with a lot of SLOW staff at the ticket counters to long lines with TSA and staff who can't not answer your questions or told not to?
I fly at least four times a year with in the USA ... I arrive early cause of delays with flights to gate problems to waiting for some drunk to find his gate.
TSA is slow cause at OK. City you are lucky if you have two check areas open at once! Most of the time it's ONE for all gates and airlines. TSA is rude but you better not say much or your pulled from the scan or worse.
Las Vegas is slow moving lines to delays at the gate for jet way clean ups as I was told on one flight. Most airport bathrooms are not clean and stink of pee or crap. Dallas was a mess cause of delays and missed flights so every time I have to land there I am late getting back to OK. City cause of back ups in Dallas. We are not a destination city in OK. So to get a flight to where you need to go you must do hoops to different city's to get to where you must go = Delays:
It's not fun to fly today as it was in the 70's and 80's and today I hate to fly cause of all the problems along the way..........
There is a very simple reason for this that is often ignored. US airports (and airlines) are some of the oldest in the world, because they were also some of the first to be built. Now with declining infrastructure budgets we are left with decaying airports while emerging/booming markets are building new and upgrading. Pretty simple actually.
I travel internationally a lot (particularly to Asia) and some strategies I use to make my life easier:
1) Avoid changing planes in the US, make your US airport your last airport. Try to do any necessary layovers at overseas airports, as those layovers are usually much nicer experiences (shopping, restaurants, internet, power) and the plane security handling is almost always more efficient than it is in the US.
2) Sorry to say this next one, but if you are of Asian descent (as my wife is), then avoid LAX and avoid Miami. The TSA/customs agents there are prejudiced as hell. I'm sure there are other racial biases in other airports, those are just the ones I have first hand experience with.
3) Pick airlines based on their hospitality reputations (e.g., Singapore airlines). Non-US airlines almost always win this.
4) Pick airlines based on amenities offered (e.g., food quality, video capabilities, power at seats). Again, almost always non-US airlines.
The only thing I nominally try to do to that is US-centric is I try to pick Boeing planes over Airbus planes, if everything else is somewhat equal. This is just a personal thing I do because I don't like the way the EU subsidizes Airbus.
Airports are a business.....and in the US, as everybody knows....businesses are dictated by the demands of two entities - politics and share holders.......in case you haven't noticed, the consumer has no stake in this or anything else anymore because.....consumers are STUPID and haven't figured out that you don't vote with your ballet - you vote with your WALLET !
As soon as people in the US stop spending their money on crappy goods and services - we will stop getting crappy goods and services.
As soon as we stop electing crappy, crooked, self-serving politicians, we will get the consumer advocacy we deserve. If you stop giving your money to crappy corporations, they won't have the money to lobby crappy politicians and the crappy politicians will have to get their support from the people that hired them, instead of the corporations who bought them.
Besides, most of the rest of the world is not driven by the corporate greed that demands we cut back on everything necessary to make the price of the stock rise higher, so greedy egomaniacal CEOs can get richer.
I truly believe that all federal laws and spending programs should sunset in 5 years. At least they could be reviewed for efficacy and altered or dumped.
Travelled extensively and can say many of the airports mentioned in top 10 are well deserved for convenience of connections, amenities, number of flights etc. I like Schiphol in Amsterdam for the ease of amenities from shopping, dining, transportation (train) and the ability to walk across the street to rental cars.
My favorite US International Airport is SFO (San Francisco)
I fly extensively, and would ask that if anyone thinks there is bias or uniformed evaluators influencing the rating system, please fly to Incheon International, in South Korea. The layout and architecture of this facility is fantastic. Over the past 2 years, I have been in an out of Incheon 10 times and have only had good and pleasing experiences to report with the staff and facilities. Upon arrival at Incheon, I've never waited on the tarmac for an aircraft to clear away from our assigned ramp. And upon departure from Incheon, my plane is always #1 for take off. The major US international HUBs like ATL, ORD, LAX, DFW, DEN and JFK are not entirely clean, or well organized, but more importantly, they and not well equipped for the volume of traffic that flows in an out of these airports. US airport owners and managers need to go back to school to learn from their competitors in the Asian Pacific. True, our major hubs are old, but they have good bones and could offer a much better experience to travelers if the owners and managers of these Airports made "customer satisfaction" their top goals.
New York Kennedy International Airport, The name is more impressive than the DUMP it really is!
Just getting off the plane and then going down the rickety old escalator which reminds one of the old Soviets Union's GUM stores; what is missing is a large sign welcoming to visitor to the socialist peoples republic of USA!
As a international traveler, I can tell you that the ridicules security levels at the US airports is over kill. The bad guys scared us on 9/11, and by looking at the fuss over loosening the security a little with the small knife issue you can see we are still a country of cowards and afraid of there shadow. Stop saying "As long as it keeps us safe" that BS.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished an upbeat week on a mixed note. The S&P 500 shed less than a point, ending the week higher by 1.3%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.1%) cemented a 1.7% advance for the week. High-beta names underperformed, which weighed on the Nasdaq Composite (-0.3%) and the Russell 2000 (-1.3%).
Equity indices displayed strength in the early going with the S&P 500 tagging the 2,019 level during the opening 30 minutes of the action. However, ... More
More Market News
As geopolitical tensions threaten to spin out of control, investors are wondering how best to position their portfolios for the global turmoil.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'