US is still paying Civil War benefits
If you're wondering what Iraq will ultimately cost, look at continuing payouts to veterans and families from wars long ago.
Maybe the government will let them know once it finally settles accounts -- from the Civil War.
The Associated Press took on a seemingly simple assignment: find out just how much America's wars have cost and what that will mean for Iraq and Afghanistan spending. It discovered that the U.S. is still paying restitution for conflicts that began in the 19th century. Lawmakers are not only unsurprised by this but insist that's how it should be.
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) says her father's disability payments from World War II helped feed her family and served as a reminder that the country needs to think about such costs before entering any such conflict.
That view has received some resistance from the other side of the aisle, however. Former Republican Sen. Alan Simpson -- who co-chaired President Barack Obama's deficit committee in 2010 -- says lawmakers looking to tamp down federal debt shouldn't consider survivor benefits off-limits. He insists that recipients should receive such payments based solely on need and that "without question, I would affluence-test all of those people."
Perhaps he would start with two elderly children of Civil War veterans in North Carolina and Tennessee. Though born in the 1920s and 1930s, the two recipients in question were fathered by Civil War veterans in their 70s and 80s (not an uncommon occurrence, especially in the veterans community). Those the two offspring still receive $876 a year in benefits. Such survivor payouts usually end by the time children turn 18, but those born with disabilities rendering them incapable of caring for themselves are covered for life.
Such is the case with 10 surviving children of veterans from the 1898 Spanish-American War. They're still awarded a combined $50,000 a year for their parents' service.
But that doesn't even come close to the compensation the U.S. pays out to Vietnam veterans, their families and families of those killed in action. That alone tops $22 billion a year, is greater than the FBI's annual budget and is nearly three times what the government pays in compensation to veterans and surviving families from World War I ($20 million), World War II ($5 billion) and the Korean War ($2.8 billion) each year.
OK -what is this nit-wit talking about?
Common social security would provide benefits to disabled children all their lives too, and they didn't need to have served their country honorably to earn it!
There's no doubt the dollars are a lot, war is costly, BUT REALLY Mr. NOTTE, you would continue to doal out billions to people who riot in Compton and Watts, give them cell phones even, yet DENY taking care of the disabled prodigy of our country's war veterans?
What the hell is wrong with you dude?
...Simpson seems to want to cut everyone but himself, and ex-presidents.......like carter and bush one
and clinton and bush two and........simpson has been drawing off the gov for a hundred years.......or so
what does it cost us for obama to go golfing all the time....hundreds of thousands...and us with an 16.7 trillion deficit...or what about gsa...? or tsa or ice or...and the litney goes on and on.....!.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Tired of constantly dying batteries, she came up with a device that could revolutionize energy storage -- and won $50,000 from Intel.
- Detroit in hot water over proposal to sell art
- Sears spirals toward oblivion
- Why aren't heads rolling at the IRS?
- Do we pay attention to roads and bridges now?
- Yahoo may be going after Hulu
- Apple's first computer could fetch $450,000
- AT&T adds sneaky fee onto its wireless bills
- Soaring ER use adds more pain to health costs
- Netflix gets 'Arrested Development' stars cheap
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks entered the weekend on a mixed note as the S&P 500 shed 0.1% while the Dow ended with a gain of 0.1%.
The major averages began the day on a lower note as nine of ten sectors saw losses of more than 0.5%.
The consumer staples sector was the lone exception as the group spent the entire day in positive territory thanks to the relative strength of Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG 81.89, +3.19). The second-largest staple stock advanced ... More
More Market News
Try as the bears might, they couldn't break U.S. stocks. But investors still face frothy prices and considerable headwinds.