The Fed won't be putting brakes on yet
Fears are starting to rise that the Fed's low-interest-rate policy could lead to more inflation or to markets that get too frothy. But Fed officials will say they need more evidence to change their policies.
The only question is when the policy will stop.
If the Fed offers a date certain on when it will stop buying bonds, you can bet the stock market will pause hard to think about what such a decision might mean. The stock market, in fact, may take a good-sized dive because many traders believe the market is overbought anyway.
But don't bet the Fed will say it will stop buying bonds in 2013 when the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed's policy-making body, announces its policy at 2:15 p.m. ET. Very few economists and money managers see it happening until 2014 at the earliest.
Right now the Fed's policy is to keep interest rates low until:
- The national unemployment drops to 6.5% or lower.
- The expected inflation rate over the subsequent 18 months is a half percentage point above the Fed's 2% long-run goal.
- There is a sense that longer-run inflation expectations are starting to spin out of control.
That's because the economic recovery has been agonizingly slow.
Right now, the unemployment rate is 7.8%. The Fed's definition of inflation puts the rate at 2% or lower. And nobody sees inflation domestically or globally starting to get frothy.
And to get frothy, we're talking something like the late 1970s when higher oil prices and big wage pressure set off a big round of inflation.
How things could get frothy
The risk to the Fed's policy is this: Rates are so low that sooner or later one or more organizations are going to borrow a great deal of very cheap money to do deals. And the deals could go south. Like Lehman Bros., which borrowed billions to lend out to real estate interests and to buy subprime mortgages -- only to see the U.S. residential real estate market collapse.
Add to that risk is the worry that very cheap money will lead to a sudden run-up of prices for assets that produce a bubble. Like oil prices or food prices.
These fears are why the presidents of several Federal Reserve banks have become concerned about the Fed policy, which has been championed by Chairman Ben Bernanke. Jeffrey Lacker, the president of the Richmond Federal Reserve Bank, dissented from all of the Fed's policy decisions for the last year. He also dissented from the Fed's moves in 2009.
He's not a voting member of the Fed this year, but Esther George, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, is a voting member this year and is seen assuming that role. James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis may also oppose Bernanke's policy.
Did the Fed enable the Apple bubble?
One could argue that the nearly 700% surge in Apple's (AAPL) stock price between March 2009 and September 2012 was enabled in part because hedge funds could borrow cheaply to buy the stock. And things were splendid until the bubble burst.
There is some chatter that rising bond yields reflects some emerging frothiness. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note settled at 1.998% on Tuesday, after briefly hitting 2% on Monday and Tuesday. The closing yield was the highest since April 2012.
But rising bond yields may also reflect that money is being pulled into the current stock market rally.
As of Tuesday's close, the Dow Jones industrials ($INDU) were up 6.5% for the month. Potentially, that's the best January performance for the blue-chip index since 1989, and the Dow is within 46 points of its first close at 14,000 or higher since October 2007 and about 210 below its all-time closing high of 14,164.53, set on Oct. 19, 2007.
The Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX), which closed above 1,500 on Friday for the first time since Nov. 6, 2007, is about 57 points below its record closing high of 1,565.15, also set on Oct. 9, 2007. The index is up 5.7% this month, potentially its best January since 1997.
More on moneyNOW
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Tired of constantly dying batteries, she came up with a device that could revolutionize energy storage -- and won $50,000 from Intel.
- Detroit in hot water over proposal to sell art
- Sears spirals toward oblivion
- Why aren't heads rolling at the IRS?
- Do we pay attention to roads and bridges now?
- Yahoo may be going after Hulu
- Apple's first computer could fetch $450,000
- AT&T adds sneaky fee onto its wireless bills
- Soaring ER use adds more pain to health costs
- Netflix gets 'Arrested Development' stars cheap
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks entered the weekend on a mixed note as the S&P 500 shed 0.1% while the Dow ended with a gain of 0.1%.
The major averages began the day on a lower note as nine of ten sectors saw losses of more than 0.5%.
The consumer staples sector was the lone exception as the group spent the entire day in positive territory thanks to the relative strength of Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG 81.89, +3.19). The second-largest staple stock advanced ... More
More Market News
Try as the bears might, they couldn't break US stocks. But investors still face frothy prices and considerable headwinds.