P&G yanks its Rosie the Riveter ad for Swiffer
Using the iconic World War II image to sell a mop is derided as insulting. But the industry clearly sticks to sexist stereotypes.
Procter & Gamble (PG) found out this week that it's not wise to put a mop in the hand of a feminist icon.
The packaged-goods giant pulled an image tapping the famous Rosie the Riveter World War II campaign after a furious backlash. The original poster shows a strong woman rolling up her sleeves with the caption "We Can Do It!" and is often used to promote feminism and women in the workforce and politics, such as this poster depicting Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard as Rosie.
P&G stirred up a hornet's nest when it posed a female model in Rosie-like garb, but instead of flexing her arm, she's holding a Swiffer mop.
That prompted one woman to write on Twitter, "We can do it! Because cleaning kitchens is a woman's work." A backlash grew from there, with others writing that "even Don Draper would wince!" -- referring to the far-from-enlightened "Mad Men" character and pointing out that Swiffer had diminished a powerful icon.
"It was not our intention to offend any group with the image, and we are working to make changes to where it is used as quickly as possible," Procter & Gamble told the Huffington Post.
But the fact is that the advertising industry is no stranger to sexism.
While that's a stark example, household cleaning ads also tend to cling to the same old tropes: Women take care of the cleaning, and men get to admire the results.
One study of broadcast TV ads from 2002 found that women were shown primarily as homemakers in commercials and that household products were most often associated with women.
But with women now either the sole or primary breadwinner in 40% of American households with children, the ad industry is long overdue for a gender image overhaul.
Aimee Picchi owns shares in Procter & Gamble, but hasn't traded in the stock for at least 12 months. Follow her on Twitter at @aimeepicchi.
Anyone who thinks that all women take care of the cleaning never met my ex wife. The only use she could possibly have for a broom would be to use it for transportation.
People are up in arms about how others "might" be looking at them.
Meanwhile, the Fed is robbing them blind every day and they say nothing.
Yeah....men admire the results..... after they get home from work. Give me a break....
Whats wrong with a woman keeping the house?
If some people search for garbage to get offended by.....if this is the worst thing that happens to you today..get over it....Fat Lesbians Liberals!!!!!!!!!
"It was not our intention to offend any group with the image, and we are working to make changes to where it is used as quickly as possible," Procter & Gamble .
Translation: We have less chance of making the right decision than Private Joker. No matter what we do, the DI is pissed.
wow, my late mom WAS Rosie the Riveter. (she passed away, age 72, in 1986.)
luv u mom!
Oh, please, can we not be so GD fussy about this sort of thing?
I we must "worry", can we just worry about things that really matter?
If you are offended by this Swiffer ad, simply do not buy the product.
That's NOT Rosie! The 'we can do it woman' is NOT Rosie the riveter!
Rosie was drawn by Norman Rockwell and looks nothing like this!
This trouble maker Aimee Picchi owns PG stock and yet has the brass to even write this stupid article? She is as bad as the Doctors who own tobacco farms and yet preach against tobacco use. When asked why they don't sell their interest in these farms they say "oh no too much profit in them" Hypocrites' one and all.
As for women bringing in the main money in 40% of the households. Good for them. Hell they wanted that status so why bitch about it now. Rosie the riveter was created to show the POSITIVE addition women were to a specific work force needed during a time of war. She was not a negative personality and these PC push fools are idiots for acting like it is otherwise. Swiffer DID NOT in any way diminish Rosie the riveter and to imply otherwise is total bullsh*t .
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages finished the session on a lower note as the S&P 500 lost 0.4% while the Nasdaq shed 0.1%. The Russell 2000, which paced the retreat on Tuesday and Wednesday, added 0.2%, trimming its December loss to 3.5%.
After spending the first half of the session in a steady retreat, the S&P 500 found technical support in the 1772 area. Upon reaching that level, the index reversed sharply, and marched back to its flat line. There was no particular catalyst ... More
More Market News
With the universe of this category in its seasonal sweet spot, these picks have tailwinds propelling them into the new year.