Hostess CEO cuts everyone's pay but his

Gregory Rayburn argues that because he isn't on the Hostess payroll, he should still get his full $125,000 a month.

By Kim Peterson Dec 4, 2012 3:50PM
Gregory 'Greg' Rayburn, CEO of Hostess Brands Inc., during a Bloomberg Television interview in New York on Nov. 16, 2012 (Scott Eells/Bloomberg via Getty Images)The CEO of Hostess Brands is getting widely criticized for taking his full salary while cutting everyone else's pay by 8%.

Gregory Rayburn will still get his $125,000 a month, or $1.5 million a year, the company told The Huffington Post. His logic is that because he isn't on the Hostess payroll, he doesn't have to take part in the company-wide pay cut.

Rayburn looks at himself as temporary, telling The New York Post he's more like outside help and therefore entitled to his full salary. He said he will leave Hostess when he's no longer needed, the Post reports.

Rayburn joined Hostess in February as chief restructuring officer, and one month later was named president and CEO. He's also on the board of directors.

To be fair, Rayburn is taking some measures to rein in his pay. He was eligible to get a bonus of between $375,000 and $1.125 million, but decided to give up the money, The Huffington Post reports. And Rayburn and three other top executives are taking $1 for the rest of the year in pay, but their full salaries will be reinstated in January.

That's small comfort to the rank-and-file employees who watched a number of Hostess executives get sweet pay raises and bonuses as the company barreled into bankruptcy. The company wants 19 top managers to stay with Hostess as it moves into the liquidation phase, and got approval from a bankruptcy judge to award up to $1.75 million in retainment bonuses.

The execs only get those bonuses if they perform specific tasks related to easing the operational wind-down, a company spokesman told The Los Angeles Times. Rayburn won't be getting a bonus.

At least 15,000 Hostess employees are losing their jobs in bankruptcy, but Hostess wants to keep about 3,200 to help wind down operations.

Hostess cracked under nearly $1 billion in debt, and blame for its demise can be spread far and wide. Private-equity firms funding the company couldn't get it off the ground. When consumers lost interest in carbs and sugar, the biggest innovation Hostess could come up with was banana-filling Twinkies. Although union members agreed to steep concessions over the years, it still failed to adjust to new realities. The old CEO, Brian Driscoll, suddenly bailed in March without explanation, Fortune reports.

More from Money Now



853Comments
Dec 4, 2012 6:47PM
avatar
Fire his butt, He is President and CEO and the board but only temp....I say he should be cut lose to ride the waves of unemployment. NOW!
Dec 4, 2012 6:43PM
avatar
Big CEOs that smile every time they eliminate someone's job and livelihood so they [ the CEO ] can line their pocketbook just a little more and bring America down just one more step should think about their after life. these people will have their final judgment just like you and I.
Dec 4, 2012 6:42PM
avatar
Love our top down dictatorships.  Power should never be in the hands of one person or even an oligarchy of the few.  Democratic running of organizations is preferable if done using facts and research, not whim.  Unions, you may not like them, but they help to decentralize power.  If not for unions, or a free press that exposes these money worshipping corporate users, we would have corruption on a vast scale.  Why, one man could try to buy a puppet like Gingrich or Romney by "contributing" one hundred and fifty million dollars, all so our government couldn't prevent checks on corporate power and greed.  I think I like democracy.  More worker owned companies please.
Dec 4, 2012 6:37PM
avatar
Do any of the rich people really know how to spend their money?  If they did they would be donating what they have to the ones they are abusing.  If they(the bosses') were to visit some of the people who lost their income, they might see what they are doing to families.  The USA is not going to have any families left if the money stays with the rich and never trickles down to the middle and lower people.  I've heard it is lonely at the top, I would not know since I've never been there.  i feel rich in so many ways without the money.  I have several friends and wonder just how many you rich people truly have without money!
Dec 4, 2012 6:33PM
avatar

This company is failing because of a history of over paying the under achieving executives.  Rayburn was hired to save the place and has beautifully proven he isn't capable of doing so.  Other than setting his own shorts on fire for the entertainment value, there is nothing he can do that is worth the pay he is receiving.  He needs to receive exactly the same pay the 18,000 employees his ineptitude has caused to be unemployed--nothing.

Dec 4, 2012 6:28PM
avatar

Honestly, for a CEO of a major brand, who's there to handle the bankruptcy proceedings, $1.5 million is a negligible amount of money... Similar CEO's are getting paid 10 times that.

 

Give him credit for taking a $1 salary for most of the year and passing up a potential $1.5 million bonus...

 

So, for taking $1 for 6 months and passing up, say $1 million in bonus, he's passed on $1.75 Million. 

 

That's around a 115% paycut.

 

Props to him for passing up that much cash when he could have taken his talent to another corporation and gotten paid many more millions.  


Remember, he's not the CEO that got the company into that mess.

avatar
That man needs to be fired, let go whatever. You can find plenty of intelligent, well educated, better people for the job who would work for ten percent of what he is paid and do a better job to boot.
Dec 4, 2012 6:19PM
avatar

Gosh

It appears many of the envious forgot what idiotic union actions led to this. To be fair--All of the other unions got it right. One was greedy and stupid costing 18,000 people their job.

 

This is a clear case of union greed.

 

Were there business issues---you bet--- many union based.

Dec 4, 2012 6:16PM
avatar

Well, one consolation concerning this (if it can be that) is that his wealth is about to be heavily taxed by Obama.

Welcome to Socialism, Mr. CEO.

Dec 4, 2012 6:14PM
avatar
I hope Mr. Rayburn gets stuck in an elevator with a bunch of screaming flatulent kids.
Dec 4, 2012 6:10PM
avatar
perfect example of the top 2% in action
Dec 4, 2012 6:06PM
avatar

thats called temp work where i live and u dont get full pay of a full time employee

 

Dec 4, 2012 6:06PM
avatar
What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. Selfishness always shows it's colors sooner or later. What sacrifices does anyone make to another human when it comes to money ? How willing and at what cost ?
Dec 4, 2012 6:03PM
avatar
Wow he gives up basically 100% of his salary in a bonus he declines and MSNBC blasts him? Headline is very misleading but of course you have Enquirer dropouts reporting for this joke of a news organization - $1MM a year is NOTHING compared to what the head of NBC makes - come on people instead of blasting this guy go after the news moguls who rake in the big bucks then charge higher advertising rates that get passed on to consumers - don't y'all know there is no free luch in the world?  Somebody has to pay for it - what about the Hollywood types making millions per film, athletes raking in huge pay days - this guy is peanuts
Dec 4, 2012 6:01PM
avatar
what a P.O.S. I hope something bad happens to him.
Dec 4, 2012 6:00PM
avatar
What exactly has Rayburn done to improve the Hostess brand? ZIPPO! When former CEO Brian Driscoll suddenly left in March, it would be interesting to see what type of "Golden Parachute" he received. This corporate greed is nothing new. The philosophy is "Do as I say concerning jobs and wages, and don't be concerned about what I decide is BEST for me." Blaming the union after they took major concessions is ridiculous. Another sterling example of "The Blame Game." It's synonymous with today's corporate world. An elaborate corporate scheme to CMA! Unfortunately the terminated workers are getting nothing but lip service.
Dec 4, 2012 5:57PM
avatar

Find out who is on the board of directors and write / call them and tell them to cut this guys pay. After they cut his pay tell this group of directors they need to now step down because they have not done their job. Thirdly, if you own their stock directly or within a Mutual Fund now sell it off.

 

Do the above with all companies that are paying these idiot CEO"s vast amount of monies and are not creating any new revenue company growth, screwing their employees and are not showing any future for the company.

Dec 4, 2012 5:55PM
avatar
look at the guy, and tell me he wasn't giving much of the money back by buying twinkies. Bet he was a box a day.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

Trending NOW

What’s this?

MARKET UPDATE

[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished the Wednesday session on a modestly lower note, but it is worth mentioning today's retreat took place after six consecutive gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.1%) and S&P 500 (-0.2%) settled not far below their flat lines, while the Nasdaq Composite (-0.8%) lagged throughout the session.

Equity indices started the day in the red, with the Nasdaq showing early weakness as large cap tech names and biotechnology weighed. The technology ... More

MSN MONEY'S