Hostess CEO cuts everyone's pay but his
Gregory Rayburn argues that because he isn't on the Hostess payroll, he should still get his full $125,000 a month.
Gregory Rayburn will still get his $125,000 a month, or $1.5 million a year, the company told The Huffington Post. His logic is that because he isn't on the Hostess payroll, he doesn't have to take part in the company-wide pay cut.
Rayburn looks at himself as temporary, telling The New York Post he's more like outside help and therefore entitled to his full salary. He said he will leave Hostess when he's no longer needed, the Post reports.
Rayburn joined Hostess in February as chief restructuring officer, and one month later was named president and CEO. He's also on the board of directors.
To be fair, Rayburn is taking some measures to rein in his pay. He was eligible to get a bonus of between $375,000 and $1.125 million, but decided to give up the money, The Huffington Post reports. And Rayburn and three other top executives are taking $1 for the rest of the year in pay, but their full salaries will be reinstated in January.
That's small comfort to the rank-and-file employees who watched a number of Hostess executives get sweet pay raises and bonuses as the company barreled into bankruptcy. The company wants 19 top managers to stay with Hostess as it moves into the liquidation phase, and got approval from a bankruptcy judge to award up to $1.75 million in retainment bonuses.
The execs only get those bonuses if they perform specific tasks related to easing the operational wind-down, a company spokesman told The Los Angeles Times. Rayburn won't be getting a bonus.
At least 15,000 Hostess employees are losing their jobs in bankruptcy, but Hostess wants to keep about 3,200 to help wind down operations.
Hostess cracked under nearly $1 billion in debt, and blame for its demise can be spread far and wide. Private-equity firms funding the company couldn't get it off the ground. When consumers lost interest in carbs and sugar, the biggest innovation Hostess could come up with was banana-filling Twinkies. Although union members agreed to steep concessions over the years, it still failed to adjust to new realities. The old CEO, Brian Driscoll, suddenly bailed in March without explanation, Fortune reports.
More from Money Now
I am so tired of hearing about CEO's. I am middle class, live from one paycheck to the next. I have worked since I was 15..am 52 now. I live a comfortable life with a roof over my head, food on the table, clothes on my back and a small amount left for a night out every now and again.
I have no problem with ANYTHING he makes. He worked his way into his position, the company hired him under a contract and they said they would pay him. Simple enough.
The key words in both of the above paragraphs is WORK!!! Stop you bitching and complaining and get a job. Stop whining about the haves and have nots. He has because he worked himself into his position. I have what I have because I get out of bed and actually go to work.
No Jobs you say? Come to Louisiana, we have billboards along the highway begging for people to come to work. Oh damn..that would mean you have to get up and WORK!
You want to complain about this CEO....Maybe we should stop paying Obama...his "company" is so far in the red it can't even get a loan. Runs so inefficient he has to keep taking more of his "workers" salaries to pay the bills! Wow...where are those socialists and "let the govt" pay for my free ride now!
And they couldn't keep the company going because why? Unions?
I think not. Here's the guy who killed it.
WOW , you people blame the CEO when they get paid well, you seem too forget that they run a company you also seem too forget the fact that his resume take huge hit.
Put the blame where it is due,The Union did and you don't here them attacking the Union President who makes a good sum and still get paid with all union dues collected from workers that no longer have a job.
What a shame! Why doesn't his pay reflect the company's "performance"? It is a joke. What boggles the mind is after the exposure of the investment company and insurance company executives ridiculous spending and salaries that led to the bail outs we atill allow these blood suckers to get away with it............... There is no pressure on the companies to do what is right and there certainly is no accountability to the shareholders. I am against big government and regulation but had always hoped that we would learn from experience and the companies would smarten up, but I guess not.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
More than 8,000 households got hit with the one-time levy as Socialist President Francois Hollande continues to target the nation's wealthiest.
- Farmers cultivate drones as new high-tech tool
- Apple's overseas hoard unfair to taxpayers
- Why hugely profitable ESPN is laying off workers
- Tornado shelters become a vital business
- Victoria's Secret won't sell cancer 'survivor' bras
- DC is doing nothing to fix the economy
- Models have it easier getting into US than engineers
- Bernie Madoff earns sweatshop wages in prison
- Motor home sales rise in hopeful economic sign
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks ended modestly higher as the S&P 500 climbed 0.2%, and the Dow added 0.4% to register its 19th consecutive Tuesday of gains.
The major averages saw little change during morning action, but afternoon buying interest helped lift the indices to session highs. Most cyclical sectors (with the exception of materials and technology) finished among the leaders, but the defensively-geared health care sector settled atop the leaderboard as biotechnology outperformed. ... More
More Market News