Hostess CEO cuts everyone's pay but his
Gregory Rayburn argues that because he isn't on the Hostess payroll, he should still get his full $125,000 a month.
Gregory Rayburn will still get his $125,000 a month, or $1.5 million a year, the company told The Huffington Post. His logic is that because he isn't on the Hostess payroll, he doesn't have to take part in the company-wide pay cut.
Rayburn looks at himself as temporary, telling The New York Post he's more like outside help and therefore entitled to his full salary. He said he will leave Hostess when he's no longer needed, the Post reports.
Rayburn joined Hostess in February as chief restructuring officer, and one month later was named president and CEO. He's also on the board of directors.
To be fair, Rayburn is taking some measures to rein in his pay. He was eligible to get a bonus of between $375,000 and $1.125 million, but decided to give up the money, The Huffington Post reports. And Rayburn and three other top executives are taking $1 for the rest of the year in pay, but their full salaries will be reinstated in January.
That's small comfort to the rank-and-file employees who watched a number of Hostess executives get sweet pay raises and bonuses as the company barreled into bankruptcy. The company wants 19 top managers to stay with Hostess as it moves into the liquidation phase, and got approval from a bankruptcy judge to award up to $1.75 million in retainment bonuses.
The execs only get those bonuses if they perform specific tasks related to easing the operational wind-down, a company spokesman told The Los Angeles Times. Rayburn won't be getting a bonus.
At least 15,000 Hostess employees are losing their jobs in bankruptcy, but Hostess wants to keep about 3,200 to help wind down operations.
Hostess cracked under nearly $1 billion in debt, and blame for its demise can be spread far and wide. Private-equity firms funding the company couldn't get it off the ground. When consumers lost interest in carbs and sugar, the biggest innovation Hostess could come up with was banana-filling Twinkies. Although union members agreed to steep concessions over the years, it still failed to adjust to new realities. The old CEO, Brian Driscoll, suddenly bailed in March without explanation, Fortune reports.
More from Money Now
Who cares what he or any CEO makes. In this country any of us have an opportunity to be that CEO and thats the real point. If you dont believe that then you are just making excuses for yourself and others. If you think that CEO doesnt deserve it, go ahead become one. Oh yeah, its not that easy is it. But just because it isnt easy doesnt mean it cant be done. Instead, the excuse makers and the blamers find it much easier to talk bad about fellow Americans and the President himself is more than happy to pit us against each other. Question for all the complainers : Do you hate athletes and movie stars just as much? They make tens of millions a year. Why is it just the big bad CEO you seem to have a problem with?
I don't see why anyone is complaining here, they needed to save money and they did. I mean cutting your workforces pay was a stroke of brillance, who else could have thought of this? After all so many other options in cost savings were put forth by him first, right??? I mean all other avenues of cost savings were surely explored and cutting your workforces pay or jobs is a last resort...... right?
This guy has clearly earned every penny and why shouldn't he collect his full pay.... Because letting profit drop by 0.5% would be out of the question, think of the board of directors, they may get paid based on profit and if it were to slip they and the CEO may not get their bonuses.... that is BS. Won't someone please think of the poor board????????? And if the CEO lost 8% he might have to downgrade his plane to the one without (gasp) a full surround sound stereo. I for one am not willing to ask him to make that kind of sacrifice, it's un-American!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The company died due to bad marketing and lousy product development along with high labor costs. While I agree the execs are overpaid, the unions are very much a big reason Hostess is closing. 40,000 employees @ $15/hr avg @ 8 hours a day @ 5 days a week @ 52 weeks = $1.2 billion. And that's not including benefit costs. That is more of a cause for the company closing than the $7 million (guessing) paid to the execs.
You will all complain about this man's salary until the day YOU are blessed enough to make that kind of money. If that day were to ever come upon you all bets are off and then it will be alright, in your eyes.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages ended the midweek session with slim gains after showing some intraday volatility in reaction to the release of the latest policy directive from the Federal Open Market Committee. The S&P 500 added 0.1%, while the relative strength among small caps sent the Russell 2000 higher by 0.3%.
Equities spent the first half of the session near their flat lines as participants stuck to the sidelines ahead of the FOMC statement, which conveyed no changes to the ... More
More Market News
Fed keeps important 'considerable time' language in reference to short-term interest rates, but dissents and dots leave doubts.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'