Lawsuit says Red Bull is too wimpy
A complaint in a New York federal court calls out the energy drink for having less caffeine than a cup of coffee.
Red Bull is the target of a lawsuit filed Tuesday that claims the company's "Red Bull gives you wings" slogan is false advertising, according to Reuters, because the energy drink contains less caffeine than a cup of coffee.
The lead plaintiff, Benjamin Careathers of the Bronx, N.Y., has been drinking Red Bull since 2002 and filed the suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York because he and others in the lawsuit feel the $2.19 price per can isn't getting them enough caffeine.
This is the exact opposite of the problem faced by Red Bull rivals Monster Energy (MNST) and 5-Hour Energy, both of which have been scrutinized by the Food and Drug Administration for packing their drinks with caffeine. The 5-Hour Energy shots have had their "no crash" claim questioned in the New York Times by a national advertising group and have been the subject of reports to the FDA during the last four years citing the possible role of 5-Hour Energy in 13 deaths.
Monster, meanwhile, saw its stock plummet in October after the FDA confirmed "adverse incident reports" of five deaths involving Monster energy drinks. Monster is now being sued by the parents of a 14-year-old Maryland girl who suffered heart problems in December 2011 after drinking Monster Energy on two consecutive days.
The FDA limits caffeine content in soda and considers 71 milligrams per 12 ounces safe for consumption. Energy drinks contain significantly more caffeine, but exploit a loophole in the FDA's caffeine guidelines, labeling themselves "diet supplements," to avoid the limit. For example, 24-ounce Monster drinks contain almost seven times as much caffeine as the most caffeinated sodas.
By comparison, an 8.4-ounce can of Red Bull contains 80 milligrams of caffeine. That roughly 9.5 milligrams per ounce still exceeds the 5.9 milligrams found in an ounce of high-caffeine soda. The lawsuit claims, however, that a tablet of regular strength NoDoz contains 100 milligrams of caffeine and costs only 30 cents.
"Even a 12 ounce serving of Starbucks (SBUX) coffee costs $1.85 and would contain far more caffeine than a regular serving of Red Bull," the lawsuit says. It has a point. A cup of Starbucks regular Pike Place Roast that size has 260 milligrams of caffeine, or more than three times than of a can of Red Bull.
The plaintiffs want Red Bull to stop the "gives you wings" campaign, which would likely put a serious crimp in its annual Red Bull Air Race and its Flugtag airborne soap box derby. More importantly, though, those named in the lawsuit are also asking for an unspecified refund.
Energy drinks make up only 3.3% of soft drink sales, according to Beverage Digest, but sales of the caffeine-laden products rose 17% 2011. Monster and Red Bull both reported double-digit percentage point sales increases in the last year, but the recent spate of energy drink lawsuits suggest a caffeine crash may be coming.
More on Money Now
this is something should be banned for anyone under 21 years of age! this junk is not good for kids with all the caffine and other things in
it. they will have heart issues earlier in life! and should be banned in bars mixing with alcohol! twice as dangerous! this is what's wrong with
kids and young adults! most kids didn't even drink coffee when i was young now every kid drinks it like it's milk! it's sad parents can't even
control their kids anymore and then expect govt to fix everything. wait til obamacare kicks in see how much the left democrats love you!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages began the new trading week on a slightly lower note with small caps leading the weakness. The Russell 2000 shed 0.3% while the S&P 500 slipped less than a point with six sectors ending in the red.
Equity indices began the day in negative territory with only the Nasdaq (-0.04%) making a very brief appearance in the green. After sliding through the first hour of action, the major averages reversed and spent the remainder of the session climbing off ... More
More Market News
Like many companies this winter, the fast-food giant blamed a drop in same-store sales on the weather. But could its problems be bigger than a snowbank?
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'