7/25/2013 4:33 PM ET|
Should food stamp recipients be required to work?
Some House Republicans are pushing that notion. However, the majority of able-bodied recipients already have jobs.
Those numbers are even more shocking considering the program's growth: A decade ago, only only about one in 12 Americans received food stamps, requiring the government to spend just $21.4 billion in 2003.
With that kind of surge in spending, no wonder Republicans are aiming at the program. Their latest push focuses on requiring food stamp recipients to hold a job.
House Republicans are mulling a work requirement, The Associated Press reports, and the lawmakers met Wednesday to discuss how to cut spending on the benefit, called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
One proposal would enable states to test work requirements, although it would be optional. "I think you have to have moral reformation before you have fiscal reformation," said Rep. Steve Southerland, R.-Fla., who made the proposal.
While any benefits program is certain to have fraud, Southerland's comment appears to suggest that food stamp recipients are happy to receive government aid while kicking back and enjoying the good life. (Remember, the average food stamp benefit shells out just $133 per month, not exactly enough for a caviar-and-champagne lifestyle.)
But the majority of able-bodied, working-age food stamp recipients already work, according to a January analysis of the program from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Some beneficiaries might be your cashiers and stockers at Wal-Mart (WMT), given that a recent report from congressional Democrats estimated a single low-paying Wal-Mart superstore costs taxpayers as much as $1.7 million per year in public benefits.
Take a look at households with at least one working-age, nondisabled adult. The CBPP report showed about 58% were employed within a month of receiving the benefit, while 82% were either working in the year before or after they received the aid.
And the number of people who work while receiving the benefit has increased for more than a decade. About 6.4 million recipients worked in 2011, up from 2 million in 2000, the study found. That indicates many Americans applied for the benefit during the Great Recession, which led to underemployment or households getting hit with layoffs or a cut in their hours, the study noted.
Of course, across the entire spectrum of food stamp recipients, it's clear why critics are alarmed at the statistics, given that nearly 37.9 million recipients weren't working in 2011. But almost half of those are children -- and not expected to work -- while an additional 23% were elderly, disabled or caring for a disabled family member.
"Most SNAP participants are either not expected to work or are working," the CBPP noted, adding, "There is not evidence that SNAP receipt creates work disincentives."
Follow Aimee Picchi on Twitter at @aimeepicchi.
Let's see, 1) most food stamp recipients already work. 2) we have massive unemployment, which is why demand is up so this is an intrinsically stupid question in the first place. 3) a number of disabled people make up the majority of food stamp recipients who don't work at all. 4) Childcare cost people, this penalizes the wrong people, kids. 4) In many states, if you work, the cut to your food stamps creates a huge financial gap because when you work your costs go up (gas, transportation, clothes, childcare) and you need MORE food stamps to be working poor, not less money. Once again, this is punishing the poor and disabled for show, rather than addressing things that keep people poor, like no free PreK 4 programs and a lack of affordable or universal healthcare.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished a down week on a cautious note with small caps leading the retreat. The Russell 2000 lost 0.5%, widening its weekly decline to 2.6%, while the S&P 500 shed 0.3%. The benchmark index ended the week lower by 2.7%.
This morning, the market was provided a basis to rebound with the July employment report, which was just right for the policy doves (209K versus Briefing.com consensus 220K). It showed payroll growth that was weaker than expected, ... More
More Market News
The company complains after the son of Florida State's football coach is televised wearing -- gasp -- Under Armour.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'