11/25/2013 9:41 PM ET|
These numbers show why the TV business is dying
Audience ratings have plunged, and more people are cutting the cable cord.
Audience ratings have collapsed: Aside from a brief respite during the Olympics, there has been only negative ratings growth on broadcast and cable TV since September 2011, according to Citi Research.
Media stock analysts Craig Moffett and Michael Nathanson recently noted that "the pay-TV industry has reported its worst 12-month stretch ever." All the major TV providers lost a collective 113,000 subscribers in Q3 2013. That doesn't sound like a huge deal -- but it includes Internet subscribers, too.
Broadband Internet was supposed to benefit from the end of cable TV, but it hasn't. In all, about 5 million people ended their cable and broadband subs between the beginning of 2010 and the end of this year.
"Our broadband-only growth has been greater than I thought it would be," he said.
Here's more evidence that cable TV is dying, and that people are also unplugging from broadband internet service:
Fewer people are watching TV.
This is the macro problem: Ratings are falling across the board. They have been for years.
It's not too surprising that broadcast TV ratings are down. The major networks have faced increasing competition for years from niche-interest cable channels and the better-quality programming on places like AMC and HBO.
But ratings for both cable and the broadcast networks are down.
People just don't watch the World Series like they used to. Recently, viewer decline is led by young people, according to Business Insider's Sports Page:
It's the same with basketball.
Maybe people prefer the NBA to the MLB? Turns out that today's big stars don't grab TV eyeballs the way they used to either.For the first time ever, the number of cable TV subscribers at major providers is about to dip below 40 million.
So why are ratings in decline?
We're at the beginning of a major historical shift from watching TV to watching video -- including TV shows and movies -- on the Internet or on mobile devices.
This is going to hurt cable TV providers.
Nearly 5 million cable TV subscribers have gone elsewhere in the last five years. The number of subscribers remaining could sink below 40 million later this year, according to this data from ISI Group, an equity research firm.
This chart (below) is the most important chart in this set: It shows the number of net subscriber additions across all types of customers -- cable TV, broadband Internet and landline phone.
The cable and broadband subscriber business is seasonal. The net number of people leaving or adding services changes with the seasons, because people like to move house in the fall.
It used to be that up to 500,000 new subscriptions would be added across all companies in any given quarter. But now, cable and internet companies are lucky if they get any new subscribers at all. Increasingly, the industry loses subscribers rather than gaining them, according to this data from One Touch Intelligence.
What's happening is that people are giving up on cable TV as a standalone product, and the market is shifting in favor of telco companies like AT&T (T) and Verizon (VZ) who offer TV as a package with high-speed internet access, according to media equity analysts at ISI Group. (Direct Broadcast Satellite appears to be remaining steady, in part because its customers often live in more rural areas and have fewer alternatives.)
One macro-economic factor behind the decline is that fewer houses actually have TV.
The total "Nielsen TV Universe" -- the number of people who watch TV -- is declining. Note that the number of U.S. households is still growing, but growth in the number of households with cable TV is declining.
Here's the big picture: People are spending more of their time on mobile, and less of their time on TV:
Even though iPhone and Android phones still struggle to show video seamlessly, the amount of video seen on mobile devices is going through the roof. About 40% of all YouTube traffic comes from mobile.
In the media industry, iPads and other tablets are sometimes called "vampire" media -- they come out at night.
This research from Macquarie Capital shows a giant mismatch between where people spend their time and where advertising money is spent. People spend more time with digital media than TV now. Ad dollars are likely to follow that shift in the long run, Macquarie says.
The collapse of TV is having a counter-intuitive effect on TV ad sales: prices are going up, even though the number of commercials is going down.
The reason? It's still really, really difficult to gather a large, mass audience in any kind of media, mobile or otherwise. The Super Bowl -- on TV -- is the only media property than can reach more than 100 million people in a three-hour stretch. That scarcity of large audiences makes TV's dwindling-but-still-big audience increasingly valuable.
The TV business may actually be addicted to the very thing that is killing it.
Even though cable TV has had its worst year ever, cable TV revenues are still rising because companies are charging the dwindling number of customers more in subscription fees. According to analysts Craig Moffett and Michael Nathanson, those higher prices are "part of the problem" that pushes out poor subscribers -- losing the TV business even more eyeballs:
"Of course, the fact that pay-TV revenue is still rising smartly is part of the problem ... We have always argued that cord-cutting is an economic phenomenon, not a technological one. ... Pay-TV revenue growth reflects rapid pay-TV pricing growth and that is precisely the problem. Rapidly rising prices are squeezing lower-income consumers out of the ecosystem."
The market does not care that the TV audience is declining.
Time Warner Cable CEO Glenn Britt said in his last-ever conference call that the cable business has been 'in denial.'
Britt, who is retiring because he has been diagnosed with cancer, told analysts on his Q3 2013 earnings call that he thought the cable business had spent too many years complacently dismissing the competition:
Regarding competition, well, duh, we have competition. I say that because when I first got this job 12 years ago, I think the cable industry as a whole, including our company, was in denial that we had real, viable competition. And I still hear some of my peers saying dismissive things about our competitors. And certainly, each of them has strengths and weaknesses, just as we do. However, they are around to stay, and we need to keep getting better at competing.
People who are unplugging from both cable TV and broadband internet are likely going to free Wi-fi.
So if fewer people are watching cable TV and fewer people are paying for Internet service, does that mean that we just don't care about watching our favorite shows anymore? Not necessarily.
Free Wi-fi -- at work, in coffee shops, and on campuses -- is making it easier for consumers to get the shows, movies and videos they want without subscribing to any kind of cable or broadband service. All of Starbucks (SBUX) offers free Wi-fi, for instance. Fifty-seven cities in the U.S., including Los Angeles, offer free Wi-fi.
Facebook (FB) and Cisco (CSCO) have joined to offer free Wi-fi access to customers in any business who check in to Facebook. Facebook’s original free Wi-fi test included just 25 stores in the Bay Area. The company has now expanded it to 1,000.
For some people, there is just no need for a cable or pipe to deliver the internet or TV to their residence specifically, as long as they are within range of a free Wi-fi hotspot.
More from Business Insider
Maybe It is about time the providers get their heads out of their rear ends and realize that people are tired of the drivel and pure
nonsense that they are broadcasting. I have seen several channels where they will broadcast different episodes of the same show
for 24 hrs. straight and they are all reruns. Go figure. The only things worth watching are pay per view sports events and new movies.
Both of these are so over priced and over rated that I would not throw my money away on them. My main gripe is the number and
length of commercials. I think that if you kept time of actual programming versus total ad time, the total time for ads would win by a long
shot. With your cable bill rivaling your monthly power bill, I ask you WHO IN THE HELL NEEDS CABLE?
This article is true. We hardly watch TV anymore----the programming stinks---
Computers have replaced TV---using a Computer IS watching TV---we can get the same information from a quick look.
Can't believe this, because we are always talking about how bad TV Programming is, including Cable!
Why pay to watch a commercial??? How stupid is that.. Your own corporate greed is putting you out of business.. And don't blame the actors they don't have to be paid a million an episode. I read that Max Bear was paid $500 an episode for Beverly Hillbillies, and still I think the best sitcom ever made.
the prices they charge are ridiculous and the service is horrible. every time i call to complain about something i have to talk to somebody from india that i can't even understand.
Here is the solution for you all. Buy a Roku device at (one time) $50 then a subscription to Netflix at $8/month and maybe to HuluPlus for another $8/month and you will be able to watch tens of thousands of movies on your TV, ads free, when you want. And pause the movie and watch it a week later from where you left, in a different room if you wish. But you need high speed internet for it. The internet signal goes into your Roku device then from Roku into your TV. I used to have Comcast and it was horrible with all those ads, and all the c... channels and content. Also the on demand was a joke compared with Netflix or HuluPlus that I have now on Roku. I left Comcast 2 years ago and I could not be happier.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished the Wednesday session on an upbeat note with the Nasdaq (+1.3%) ending in the lead. The S&P 500 settled higher by 1.1% with all ten sectors posting gains.
The benchmark index spent the entire trading day in the green, rallying to new highs during the last hour of action. The tech-heavy Nasdaq, meanwhile, briefly dipped into the red during morning action, but was able to recover swiftly.
Stocks began the trading day with modest gains ... More
More Market News
The company is scrambling to protect its equities arm, which could face declining volume and revenue as competitors close the gap.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'