5 aftershocks of the financial crisis

The Great Recession's legacy is still with the US, long after Lehman Brothers fell in the fall of 2008. Here are 5 ways we're still feeling the impact.

 of 7
 of 7


Oct 10, 2013 8:40PM
On page 4 of this article there is this laughable statement:
"The Fed's relentless quantitative easing also has provided an unexpected benefit -- lower interest rates."

Low interest rates are EXACTLY the purpose of the Fed's qualitative easing programs that directly resulted from the 2008-2009 financial crises.  This wasn't at all unintended.  Keep in mind that QE3 is now almost universally called a "stimulus" program for the US economy.

The US Government, with complicity of the Federal Reserve banks, are playing a slick trick on "we the sheeple".  The US blithely continues deficit spending to the tune of about $1 trillion per year.  If they tried to get this funding by selling US Treasury obligations on the open international market, relatively high interest rates would result as the buyers would demand rewards commensurate with the risk.  As a minimum, the interest rate would have to be at least the rate of inflation in the US.  In turn, consumer rates would float at interest levels above this "prime" rate.

But since 2009, under the guise of the QE3 "stimulus" program, the Federal Government has been pawning off its annual deficits to the Federal Reserve banks, currently to the tune of $85 billion per month, at near-zero interest rates.  This accumulating debt obligation that is earning essential no interest goes indirectly onto the backs of US taxpayers since the Fed is the ultimate "too big to let fail" so-called-private organization. The Federal Reserve does not have to make "investments" that earn money since they are answerable to no one and they alone control the money supply in the US.  So, the Federal Reserve keeps prime interest rates low and this, in turn, gives consumers relatively low interest rates.

Nice while it lasts, but what happens when (if ever) the Fed wants to offload its massive accumulation of US Treasuries and US mortgage-backed securities, now approaching $4 TRILLION?
Oct 11, 2013 4:49AM
By far, the two biggest after Shocks have been Seniors being Jacked out of interest income in their Retirement Savings and the Same for the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds. Neither Republicans nor Democrats are talking about this.

QE hasn't even solved the Problem just delayed when the next even bigger Shock will come. All in the name of saving everyone when in Fact it has only save the ones that don't need saving, the SuperRich. Thanks for nothing Uncle Ben.

Oct 11, 2013 11:51AM
How about an article that states the reality, i.e. 5 things about how the 1% benefited from crashing wall street and 20 ways in which the 99% were screwed by the richest people in the world.  How about the 20 richest families responsible for this economy and the addresses to their homes across the globe?  
Oct 11, 2013 10:25AM
We got maneuvered into that disaster,  and they'll maneuver us some more before it's all over,  if it ever is.
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.


Ask Stacy: How can I know I'll have enough to retire?

One online calculator tells a reader he's on track, and another tells him he'll need to save half his salary from now until he retires. Which one are you supposed to believe?