5/22/2012 3:37 PM ET|
Banks accused of foreclosure bias
The big banks may be neglecting foreclosed homes in minority neighborhoods, according to one housing discrimination watchdog.
The green bungalow at 136 Chappell Road in northwest Atlanta brings a little bit of the country into the big city -- a wooded lot, a big lawn, a wraparound front deck. But come in for a closer look and you'll notice that the windows are boarded up, the wood siding has started to peel, and two holes have opened in the front eaves. Old tires lean against one side and the back door is missing. Inside, debris is strewn around the living room and mold grows on the walls.
A coalition of fair housing groups say those conditions are present in hundreds of foreclosed homes around the country that have been taken over by banks -- and they claim that the new owners are not treating all homes equally.
The National Fair Housing Alliance and four sister organizations spent a year visiting bank-owned houses (also known as real-estate owned homes, or REOs) in 11 major cities across the country. In April, the groups released a report charging that once banks take possession, they do a far better job of maintaining and marketing homes in white neighborhoods than they do in minority neighborhoods.
The groups evaluated the maintenance and marketing of more than a thousand REOs in cities such as Atlanta, Dallas and Washington, D.C. Their report concludes that the REOs in minority neighborhoods that they visited were 34% more likely to have significant trash and debris outside and 82% more likely to have broken or boarded windows. Bank-owned houses in white neighborhoods, they say, were 33% more likely to be marketed with "for sale" signs, which is critical to attracting owner occupants as buyers, rather than investors.
In the house on the left, the authors of the NFHA report found almost no damage when they visited the property. The lawn had been recently mowed and a for-sale sign was prominently displayed. In the right house, the authors found chipped paint, damaged steps, broken gutters and a kicked-in door.
The NFHA has also recently filed complaints with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development against Wells Fargo and U.S. Bank, and hopes to file complaints against more banks in the future. The documents allege that both banks have failed to maintain and market their REOs in minority compared with white neighborhoods and thus have violated the 1968 Fair Housing Act, which makes it illegal to discriminate in housing and housing-related activities.
U.S. Bank spokeswoman Teri Charest responded that, because the bank has not received details of specific properties involved in the complaint, it's impossible to know whether it owns them. She says the bank has a "strong and comprehensive" process for inspecting and maintaining properties it owns. Wells Fargo did not respond to a request from The Fiscal Times for comment, but recently a bank spokesman told Spanish-language newspaper El Hispano that the bank "conducts all lending-related activities in a fair and consistent manner without regard to race, and this includes maintenance and marketing standards for all foreclosed properties for which we are responsible."
NFHA president Shanna Smith says that before groups visited the properties, they verified that Wells Fargo and U.S. Bank were the owners of record, using data from sources such as federal databases, county tax records and private real-estate data vendors.
Ryan Pulliam, a contractor and the CEO of All Seasons Eviction, which offers property preservation services in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., agrees that in the minority neighborhoods where he works, REOs are less well kept. But he attributes the disparity to bank mismanagement, rather than any overt discrimination, calling the big banks' contracting process "a mess."
Pulliam says that banks can take months to approve bids for work and sometimes use more than one main contractor to service houses, which can lead to contradictory orders to subcontractors. He adds that because there's not much difference in the cost of repairing and maintaining houses of different values, banks prioritize fixing up, maintaining and selling homes in more expensive areas. The local banks, he says, do a far better job of maintaining their REOs.
Alan Mallach, a housing and community development scholar at the Brookings Institution, thinks the disparate treatment may have more to do with economics than race. "These lenders typically are large impersonal entities that are focused on the bottom line. I'd be a little surprised if they neglect properties that have value . . . for racial reasons." But he adds that houses in neighborhoods of color might be undervalued compared with economically similar white areas. That, in turn, might lead banks to be reluctant to spend money on REOs in those areas because of their lower values.
Still, that doesn't relieve banks of their responsibility for upkeep, he says: Once a bank takes title to a property, it has a "legal and moral responsibility" to maintain it. And the NFHA's Smith notes that they are not asking for major renovations on houses in these neighborhoods, but basic upkeep -- fixing gutters, removing trash and mowing yards.
A representative of the Department of Housing and Urban development said the agency can't comment . . . Under agency policy, if HUD finds the claim has merit, it will investigate and invite the NFHA and the banks to negotiate an agreement. If the banks don't come to the table, the case goes before a HUD administrative law judge, or the NFHA could ask the Department of Justice to pursue it in federal civil court. Smith says the coalition would like to work out an agreement to change bank practices. But if that doesn't happen, the coalition is prepared to go to court.
Whatever the outcome, those who live near bank REOs are "furious," says Gail Williams of Metro Fair Housing of Atlanta, which participated in the investigation. According to a study by the Appraisal Institute, an overgrown yard or deteriorating home can reduce the value of surrounding homes by as much as 15%. In surveys of the people who live next to REO homes, NFHA says neighbors often step in to cut the grass and clean up debris themselves.
So even while real estate starts to recover around the country, say the housing advocates, in these neighborhoods, the housing crash lives on.
More from The Fiscal Times:
MORE ON MSN MONEY
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Trust me when I tell you that the banks and mortage servicers are as crooked as they get!!!!!!!! We had one house payment that they alledge was past due (this supposedlly happened in the month that our house was destroyed by fire) which we got letters telling us that no monies would be distributed to contractors if any monies were past due, however they released all monies to the contractors as well as us, then popped up 6-7 months later with the claim we were a month past due back to the month of the fire. Now they want to foreclose on the property....really, don't you think someone would have caught this before now? BULLSH*T, now the house is a custom built home instead of the track house it started out to be, with tens of thousands of our dollars invested into the upgrades!!!!!! Saxon and Novastar smell MONEY and will stop at nothing to get it...well heres the news of the day I'll burn this MF'r to the ground before they get it!!!!!!!!!
My last words to SAXON AND NOVASTAR IS GO TO HELL>>>MAYBE I'LL SEE YOU THERE!!!!!!!!!!
I live in a community where white is the minority.
I am just curious.....
1) How long had each of the homes visited been in foreclosure or unoccupied?
2) What was the condition of each of the homes BEFORE the foreclosure?
3) How much of the damage was caused by vandalism?
Just ask yourself this: if you had the choice of living in a predominantly black neighborhood or a predominantly white neighborhood, all other factors being equal, what would you choose?
dexter your an idiotif youreally believe black white or mexican asian indian or any other thing enters into the formual when the bank sees easy money....
There's only one demographic that matters when looking at banks granting loans: The borrower's ability to repay the loan.
Race/sex/ethnicity/etc shouldn't make a difference, unless you want another housing collapse.
This is one of the dumbest f&*king things I've heard since the recession started!!!!!!!
if one house is worth than the other you will always do more upkeep on the house worth more especially if you have a couple in that neighborhood that are forclosed.
hmm loose 500,000 or loose 100,000. i would choose 100,000.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
RECENT ARTICLES ON PERSONAL FINANCE
Which store penalizes you for too many returns? And which one will let you retroactively apply coupons?