House GOP seeks billions in food stamp cuts
Also on the chopping block are federal workers' retirement benefits, government flood insurance, and grants for social services.
House Republicans are calling for $34 billion in cuts over the next decade to the food stamp program, setting up a fresh election year battle over the U.S. budget deficit.
Lawmakers said they plan to include the reductions in a package of $261 billion in spending cuts they will propose to replace automatic cuts scheduled to take effect in January.
House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas said the plan is designed to squeeze inefficiencies out of the food-stamp program, which is projected to cost taxpayers about $80 billion this year.
"It's basically closing loopholes; it's tightening things up; it's reflecting the budgetary times we're in," said Lucas, an Oklahoma Republican.
Democrats said such cuts would hurt millions of poor Americans. "We're literally going to take it out of the mouths of babes," said Representative Peter Welch, a Vermont Democrat. "It's outrageous."
The plan is sure to stall in the Democratic-controlled Senate and probably will become a campaign issue.
"Everything that happens in an even-number year is always an election issue," Lucas said. The plan will establish a marker for Republicans in negotiations over what to do about the potential budgetary collision that looms at the end of this year.
About $1 trillion in automatic cuts are set to begin taking effect in January -- the outcome of last year's failure of a budget-cutting supercommittee to agree on a plan to reduce the deficit. The Bush-era income tax cuts will expire at the end of the year, and the government once again will be approaching its debt limit.
A budget plan adopted last month by House Republicans orders half a dozen congressional committees to recommend $261 billion in spending cuts by April 27. Lawmakers aim for the plan to reach the House floor in May.
The chamber's tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, charged with finding $53 billion in savings, is taking up legislation today that would make it harder for illegal immigrants to receive a child tax credit. It will also consider ending social services block grants, which help states provide a variety of services to low-income Americans.
"In their zeal to cut taxes for the very wealthy, House Republicans continue to put the burden on the backs of children, the elderly and the disabled," said Representative Sander Levin, the top Democrat on the Ways and Means panel.
The most significant item before Ways and Means would save $43.9 billion by requiring people who receive more in health insurance subsidies than they're eligible for under the 2010 health care law to return the entire overpayment to the government. Unanticipated increases in income -- such as a year- end bonus --can change someone's eligibility for tax credits, which will be calculated based on the previous year's income and paid directly to insurance companies.
Current law caps the amount of overpayments that taxpayers are required to refund to the government. Representative Dave Camp, the Michigan Republican who chairs the Ways and Means Committee, said the change would protect taxpayers by preventing them from paying for benefits to people who don't qualify.
The change would increase the number of individuals without health insurance by 350,000, said Thomas Barthold, chief of staff of the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation.
Other programs that probably will be targeted include federal workers' retirement benefits and the government's flood insurance program. Republicans also want to revamp medical malpractice laws to limit damages, which the Congressional Budget Office says would save money because lower insurance premiums for doctors would translate into smaller fees for their patients.
Food stamp cuts may be among the most contentious proposals. The program grew rapidly after the 2008 financial crisis, with about one in seven Americans now receiving benefits averaging $134 a month. This year's cost is more than the annual budgets of most federal agencies, and food stamp costs have more than doubled since 2007.
The Republicans' plan, which the chamber's Agriculture Committee is taking up today, would end a $20-a-month increase in benefits provided in the administration's economic stimulus plan. It also would clamp down on what Republicans call abuses by state governments of the program's eligibility rules, which they say have allowed many undeserving people to receive benefits.
"All we're simply saying is: 'You need to qualify for what you receive,'" Lucas said.
More from Bloomberg
a year Federal Pension. I need some punishment like that.
This is just the beginning of what is to come. The mandatory cuts will probably happen and everyone will continue the blame game. The public is getting tired of all the bickering and no resolutions. All I hear is “This is wrong….This is not going to work….It will cost…., etc” and there is no response with resolution(s) on how to fix the problem.
I believe that we need to focus on our elected officials from the House and Senate and force them to play together and teach them the meaning of sharing. We should ALL be in it together! There will be some pain in the beginning but as always, this will pass and Americans will adjust.
Trillions and trillions and more uncountable trillions down the sinkhole of the military industrial complex the last fifty years that benefited nearly no one except a very small percentage of the population. We should have had a peace dividend and a better life for americans instead it's gone the other way to even more insane military spending. This country with its crumbling infrastructure and huge and growing underclass is now the newest and biggest third world country. Our government has sold the common man down the river and has built a police state apparatus to protect themself from us just in case we decide to do something about it. This country has become a joke and disgrace and I'm
NOT proud to be an american.
Republicans want more of these programs to be state run, yet they now claim that states are giving away benefits to those who don't deserve it? What's to keep states from doing the right thing with federal government taxpayer money?
In Wisconsin for example, Scott Walker came up short in balancing the budget so to balance the budget he is taking money from the federal government given to Wisconsin to help homeowners underwater with their mortgages.
Why must our most vulnerable in our society always bear the biggest burden of fixing our problems?
I live on SSI. I have been fully disabled since 1997. I can't work, so can't just get a second job to raise my income.
What they leave out of those figures, is SS pays less than 70% of poverty level($9500/year in my case). and has not had a cost of living increase for 3 years<2012 first COL in 4 years> . My Perscriptions are $12,000 a year , and Medicare part D cover less than half of that. which leaves me $3,000 a year for everything else I need to live. What kind of a home with utilities can you get for $250 a month and that leaves nothing for food or non-food nessesities Like Toilet paper and soap. I have internet, because if it $20, a telephone is $60 (even with this so called life-line service the government pays for that is suppost to make it $1 a month, it only covers 911 service, still have to have the phone for it to work)
I get $90 a month in food stamps, and without it I wouldn't eat. and even with it I eat what is on sale, not a balanced diet. you set a meal plan for 21 meals at $1 per meal total cost. I am a good shopper, but you can't do it.
Now they want to take my only food source away? Let them try to live on what I get and see how long it takes them to develope a little compassion for the poverty stricken.
Social Services are more important the the Congression Dinning Room, but you don't see them getting right or thier free meals. or free haircut, and who else on the PLANET gets to vote themselves a raise? When they give up some of thier perks and take a pay cut then, they have to right to talk about reducing costs elsewhere. they are all millionaires, and they get everything they need free, but they want to pick on the poor.
Brings to mind a Quote " Are there no Prisons, are there no Workhouses, .... if they would rather die, then they should do so and reduce the Surplus Population"
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Breaking up big banks is an untested solution to the too big to fail problem that attempts to isolate and dismantle large, troubled institutions while protecting the rest of the economy.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
[BRIEFING.COM] There wasn't a lot of excitement in the stock market today and there is nothing wrong with that. After rallying in broad-based fashion on Friday, the major indices stood their ground (for the most part) amid a lack of conviction from buyers and sellers alike.
Today wasn't a case so much of the stock market going up as it was a case of some influential stocks going up to keep the major indices on a winning path. In fact, decliners were just about even with ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|