The game plan that lets Romney beat Obama

It’s time for Republicans to stop mewing like sick kittens and get on with ejecting President Obama from the White House.

By The Fiscal Times Mar 16, 2012 4:14PM
By Liz PeekThe Fiscal Times

It’s time for Republicans to stop mewing like sick kittens and get on with ejecting President Obama from the White House. Like Victorian mothers fussing over their daughters, pundits on the right can’t stop nattering over frontrunner Mitt Romney’s flaws. He has not yet won over a clear-cut majority of GOP voters, he will preside over a divided party, his unfavorables are too high, he’s gaffe-prone, he carries some baggage – most notably Romneycare.

These are concerns that, in many cases, also dogged Ronald Reagan during primary season in 1980. Mr. Reagan, too, was expected to lose; he, too, was under attack from different factions in the Republican Party, he polled at a disadvantage to the incumbent, he made some unfortunate ethnic jokes, he was pilloried for his record as a tax-raiser.

It didn’t matter. Once nominated, Reagan went after President Carter, who was vulnerable. This year, Mitt Romney (the most likely nominee) will go after President Obama, who is also vulnerable. A candidate whose campaign theme is, “I can’t get anything done!” and who continues to blame his predecessor for every misfortune doesn’t have much to sell.

How should the GOP campaign unfold?  Mr. Romney’s overarching theme should be the basic difference between the left and the right: Democrats want to control or influence an ever-larger slice of our nation’s commerce. They want to oversee, for instance, the insurance companies, drug producers, hospitals, banks, coal miners, oil producers, pipeline operators and auto suppliers. By way of ramped-up regulation, subsidies and energized litigators, they seek to impose their priorities on businesses large and small – their rapture over green energy, their deference to organized labor, their indifference to profits.

Mr. Romney’s retort: the government is not good at commerce. If bureaucrats could run the economy, the Soviet Union would have survived. This is a winning message. Polling done by the Gallup organization last fall revealed that 64 percent of Americans consider “Big Government” the greatest threat to the country -- much more than big business or big labor.  Skepticism over the role of the federal government is profound; Americans estimate that 51 cents of every dollar spent by the government is wasted.  Perhaps even more surprising is a poll also conducted last fall that showed Americans twice as ready to blame the federal government than Wall Street for our economic woes. Imagine -- after the biggest financial crash in decades.

These are startling positions, and excellent fodder for Republicans. Romney will have at his disposal several examples of federal foolishness ready-made for a campaign. He can start with energy. The disappointing but heavily subsidized Chevy Volt is the kind of symbol campaigns beg for; the failed Solyndra is another. The Obama administration’s   commitment to alternative energy at any cost – a pursuit that will inevitably drive up costs for companies and individuals – can be exploited. If, in November, gasoline prices are still higher than normal, the public will be open to charges that Mr. Obama’s energy policy is responsible.

Even if gasoline prices revert to more normal levels, Republicans can bang away on the foolhardy Keystone decision, the early-term slowdown in the leasing of federal lands, the EPA’s steroidal mandates for power companies. With U.S. energy reserves soaring, Americans will not buy the notion that fossil fuels have no future – nor should they.

Another weapon at Mr. Romney’s disposal will be Obamacare. A firm majority of the country (53 percent in a Rasmussen poll) continues to support repeal of the controversial bill.  As much as Americans dislike the federal government’s interference in the workplace, they especially don’t like Uncle Sam reaching into their homes. As those on the left have pointed out, this is inconsistent with the rising number of Americans who receive services from the government, and most especially Medicare.

Still, many object to the notion that an independent advisory group appointed by the White House will have considerable sway over future Medicare reimbursement rates. Most important, while the bill was sold as a way of reining in the growth in healthcare expenditures, it is clear the law will have no such impact. Otherwise, why are we still arguing over plans to reform Medicare?

Romney has already laid out a reasonable defense of the bill he adopted while Governor of Massachusetts. He portrays Obamacare as an attempt to conclude a “government takeover of health care,” while his program was focused on helping people obtain health insurance. He has noted that his health care bill raised no new taxes and cut nothing from seniors’ benefits; Obamacare does both. As we race closer to the huge tax increases Obamacare will levy in 2013 and 2014, this is a powerful distinction.

Meanwhile, the jobs picture has improved, but only from tragic levels. The rate of hiring is way below normal for a recovery; the GOP can reasonably criticize President Obama for having abandoned the job push too early, focusing instead on healthcare. They can also point to our soaring national debt – borrowings that now preclude us from undertaking the kind of infrastructure spending that most Americans would welcome and that might provide jobs. 

President Obama has been campaigning like a demon, only to see his approval ratings sink in inverse relation to gasoline prices. Perhaps this is the most startling realization for the GOP; Mr. Obama turns out not to be the incandescent orator people thought him to be. Those Victorian mothers should calm down; Romney can win this race.

Related Links:
Why Romney Can't Beat Obama in 2012
Obama’s Energy Plan: Costs Rise, Jobs Decline
Obama Now Eager to Take on Romney
Obama, Romney Sweep Real Tax Reform Under the Rug

Mar 20, 2012 1:23PM

Yes, this piece is obviously biased. But I think it still makes some valid points:

1) Democrats generally favor larger government, and Obama fits in with that tendency.
2) Government is notoriously inefficient with taxpayer money.

It doesn't necessarily mean Romney will win, but these are valid points and his best chance to win.
Mar 21, 2012 10:14AM
Game Plan... have the Republican governors and state legislators RESTRICT THE VOTE through make believe voter fraud legislation!!!
Mar 20, 2012 9:36PM
Where are you getting all this increased regulation stuff.  The only thing that has been re-regulated is part of the banking and insurance industry.  As for medical - you may have a point, but it has been so out of control, something needs to be done.
Mar 20, 2012 12:50PM
What a cynical piece of tripe.
Yes--all Romney has to do to win is play on the ignorance of the American public.  As long as a majority believe universal health care is evil, Wall Street didn't bring down the economy and corporations have an inalienable right to pollute, the Republicans can win!
But win what?  An empire unravelling.
Mar 21, 2012 10:22AM

Dems are NOT in favor of larger government. Check your facts. The size of government expanded more under Republican leadership..Check Reagan and Bush... Obama has laid off over 500,000 government employees due to cuts he has made. Dems favor funding social safety net programs and education.. not tax breaks for big business and the wealthy. Ever Dem I know wants the smallest government possible but to provide the necessary programs to make our society the best in the world and we want it to be efficient!. That means the best educated and a healthy population!
Mar 20, 2012 6:35PM
Flip Flop..Flip Flop Mitt went up the clock (on Nov 6)... the clock spoke  Obama... and Mitt came tumbling down and all the king 1%ers got together went to watch one of their football teams or Nascar teams.  Vote Obama 2012
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.




Quotes delayed at least 15 min
Sponsored by:


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
Market index data delayed by 15 minutes
[BRIEFING.COM] The S&P 500 trades lower by 0.4%, while the Russell 2000 (-0.9%) underperforms.

Just reported, existing home sales hit an annualized rate of 5.05 million units in August, while the consensus expected a reading of 5.20 million. The pace for August was up from the prior month's revised rate of 5.14 million units (from 5.15 million). Nasdaq -26.88 at 4552.91... NYSE Adv/Dec 559/2272... Nasdaq Adv/Dec 561/1935.


There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.