2 issues that can bring down the economy
A pair of hard deadlines are approaching: The need to raise the debt limit and the expiration of tax cuts at the end of the year.
The term “crisis” is frequently overused in Washington, never more so than in budget debates. The problem is that a real crisis requires a hard deadline by which time something must happen or something terrible will happen.
There are two hard deadlines approaching, the need to raise the debt limit and expiration of all expiring tax cuts at the end of the year. These two action-forcing events, when combined with more than the usual political uncertainty over control of Congress and the White House next year, mean that the long-awaited fiscal crisis is now here.
As we saw last year, Republicans are perfectly willing to risk default on the national debt to force action on their agenda. Many have said that they will never vote to increase the debt limit, no matter what. Now Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney is piling on by criticizing Rick Santorum, his principal opponent for the GOP nomination, for having voted in favor of raising the debt limit while in the Senate.
Eventually, Republicans agreed to a deal that would raise the debt limit in return for $1.2 trillion in automatic budget cuts, apportioned equally between domestic and defense spending. Unless the law is changed, these cuts will take effect on January 1. Both Republicans and defense officials in the Obama administration are alarmed by the impact of these impending cuts.
More importantly, congressional Republicans and the Treasury both thought that the debt limit increase that had been agreed to was sufficient to get past the election. Now it appears that this may not be the case and it will be necessary to raise the debt limit before the election to avoid a default that would roil world financial markets to their core.
Finally, there is the expiration of all the tax cuts of the George W. Bush administration and the temporary cut in the payroll tax that was enacted as a stimulus measure. Without action, the payroll tax will rise by 2 percent, the top income tax rate will rise to 39.6 percent from 35 percent, the tax on dividends will rise to 39.6 percent from 15 percent, and the capital gains rate will rise to 20 percent from 15 percent. There is a long list of other expiring provisions as well.
Dealing with all of these issues before the end of the year would be difficult enough in a normal year. But doing so in a presidential election year might be impossible. White House and congressional leaders may be thinking that some of them can be negotiated in a lame duck session after the election. But if there is a radical change in Congress in the election, then all bets are off.
Up until recently, both Republicans and Democrats have been assuming that Republicans would hold the House and probably increase their numbers in the Senate, possibly even getting control. Republicans have been assuming that they would regain the White House. Now those political assumptions are in flux.
The long drawn out Republican race has significantly reduced Republican chances of retaking the White House. And with each of the remaining candidates supported by so-called super PACs with billionaire backers, fears are growing that the party won’t even know who its nominee will be until the convention. It appears almost certain that whoever finally gets it will be severely weakened and unacceptable to significant numbers of Republicans.
Meanwhile, record low approval ratings for Congress are weighing on incumbents of both parties. However, Democrats believe that the burden of disapproval is falling more on the Republicans. Consequently, Democrats now think they will hold the Senate and have a good shot at retaking the House.
Of course, these perceptions could change before November. In the meantime, both parties are trying to figure out how to play budget and tax issues for maximum political benefit. Unfortunately, to the extent that both parties think they will have better cards to play after the election, it reduces the chances that any kind of deal can be reached beforehand. This means that they will just fester all year, adding to uncertainty and risking economic chaos.
With the economy picking up, the Treasury may get enough extra tax revenue this year to put the debt limit problem off until after the election. I suspect that the expiring tax cuts will simply be extended for another year or two after the election unless Obama loses. In that case, he may veto any extension. Senate Democrats may also filibuster any Republican effort to extend them in 2013, leaving the economy to cope with a large tax increase at a time when it may still be fragile.
Clearly, the optimum solution would be a deal this year to replace the automatic budget cuts now in law with a better mix of spending reductions, as well as some kind of tax reform package to replace the expiring tax provisions and get the tax system on a permanent track. But given time constraints and political gridlock, it is hard to see that happening.
One thing is sure. Both sides will use the threat of fiscal apocalypse to energize their voters. How that plays out may determine the ultimate resolution of the nation’s looming fiscal crisis.
- 8 Things You Didn’t Know about Payroll Tax-Cut Deal
- Obama, Romney Sweep Real Tax Reform Under the Rug
- Election 2012: Obama is Misplaying the Tax Card
- Another Debt Ceiling Standoff? Please, Not Again!
I am thinking our country would be doomed if the Democrats took all three houses. You would not recognize our country in the aftermath. The Constitution would go by the wayside. We seen that starting to play out with Obama Care in the first two years of this administration. Voting on it before anyone got a chance to read it.
Everyone would be living off the Gov't teat and there would no longer be a USA. Only an America run by the Federal Gov't in collusion with the United Nations.
Then those representing America would do so regardless of any area. In other words, the largest liberal populations would control everything.
There must be a system of checks and balances, without it, you may just as well say - Civil War.
As usual, journalists go to the most sensational terms even when this promotes falsehoods (i.e. lies, if you don't want to beat around the bush).
There was not, and will never be any chance of "default" from any of these debt ceiling debates. There are already laws saying that the interest on the debt, and the debt itself, must be paid on time. This means that whatever else has to be cut, it will not cause a DEFAULT on Treasury debt. This is just a bunch of bull-hockey. Some spending might have to be cut or deferred, but no default.
The FED has become a PAYDAY LENDER to our bankrupt country due to our inept (both parties) CONGRESS and a 2nd PRESIDENT in a row who has not seen a $ they do not want to spend; whether it is available from borrowing or tax collections.
NOW - we have class warfare and a group of entitled people who are ruining our AMERICAN DREAM!!! The middle class will not exist in 10 more years if this style of non-governance continues.
Of course our elected officials are exempt from what us "common folks" are required to do. HEALTH CARE, LAVISH PENSIONS, AUTOMATIC PAY RAISES THEY VOTE ON THEMSELVES, LAVISH EXPENSE ACCOUNTS, INSIDER TRADING, ETC. ETC. ETC.
We need to demand accountability and honesty!!!
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Breaking up big banks is an untested solution to the too big to fail problem that attempts to isolate and dismantle large, troubled institutions while protecting the rest of the economy.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|