Is Adelson's political activism hurting shareholders?
The Las Vegas Sands head may be focused too much on the US presidential campaign and not enough on his gaming empire.
The underperformance may be due to several factors, including worries about slowing economic growth in China, which is overshadowing improvements in Las Vegas Sands' home market. Adelson, who Forbes magazine estimates is worth about $25 billion, hasn't helped matters either with his political activism, which may suggest he's focused too much on politics and not enough on running the company. He and his wife donated $16.6 million to the presidential campaign of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, single-handedly enabling it to continue even though Gingrich obviously lacked enough political support to win. The tycoon switched his allegiance to Mitt Romney after the Gingrich campaign ended.
Adelson's dislike of Barack Obama isn't unique. Less than half of those recently polled by Gallup approved of the President's job performance. Super Pacs, which gained power thanks to the Supreme Court's Citizens United decisions, are expected to push spending on the election to nearly $10 billion, making it the most expensive in history. The Center for Responsive Politics estimates that the secretive organizations have raised more than $240 million this year and spent about $140 million, mostly on behalf of conservatives.
Liberals aren't entirely blameless either. DreamWorks Animation CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg is a big donor to Democratic causes, as is his company. Comcast (CMCSA) tilts towards Democrats, as well, though that may because the company's hometown of Philadelphia hasn't elected a Republican mayor since the 1950s. Unions likely will leave no stone unturned in their quest to re-elect the president.
Though money does have an impact on politics, it certainly does not guarantee results. Adelson could have spent $1 billion backing Gingrich and the results of the Republican primary would not have been much different since voters disliked the former Congressman. Of course, Democrats will use Adelson's past criticisms of Romney against the former Massachusetts governor.
Many wealthy candidates, including Carly Fiorina, Meg Whitman and Linda McMahon, have failed to connect with voters. McMahon, the former World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) CEO, spent $50 million of her own money on her failed U.S. Senate bid two years ago. She is trying again this year and polls show her gaining ground against Chris Murphy, the likely Democratic challenger.
Politics, like horse racing, is the sport of kings. Adelson can easily afford to gamble $100 million to push the U.S. in the direction he supports. Those unable to match him dollar-for-dollar are out of luck.
Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed companies. Follow him on Twitter@jdberr.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Breaking up big banks is an untested solution to the too big to fail problem that attempts to isolate and dismantle large, troubled institutions while protecting the rest of the economy.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages continue to hover near their recent levels while the 10-yr yield has climbed back above 2.00%.
The consumer staples sector is among today's outperformers as Mondelez International (MDLZ 31.90, +0.90) trades higher by 2.9% after reporting earnings and revenue in line with analyst expectations.
Elsewhere, the discretionary sector has been supported by retailers even as Target (TGT 68.69, -2.57) trades lower by 3.6% ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|