Voter survey gives Romney a surprising edge
While perceptions of the economy and President Obama's handling of it have improved, the public also likes Romney's theme of smaller government.
By Yuval Rosenberg
Maybe Mitt Romney had a point. For all the uproar over his secretly videotaped comments essentially writing off 47 percent of the American public as moochers, and for all the pronouncements that his gaffe-ridden, or "inelegant," campaign is toast, the demoralized Republican camp can perhaps find a glimmer of hope in the results of a new voter survey released Monday by the Pew Research Center.
The survey found that 87 percent of registered voters say the economy will be very important in determining their vote, and 83 percent say the jobs picture will be a similar priority. Those two issues have stayed at the top of voters' minds, as they were in 2008, while matters such as energy, terrorism and immigration have fallen in importance compared to 2008.
While perceptions of the economy and Obama's handling of it have improved in recent polls, the Romney campaign scored on another point: the voting public's continuing preference for smaller government. The Pew survey found that 56 percent of registered voters prefer a smaller government providing fewer services, while 35 percent say they want a bigger government providing more services. Four years ago, according to Pew, the split between those two views was significantly narrower, with opinion favoring smaller government by 46 percent to 40 percent.
Just as important for Romney, opinions about the size of government actually correlate with voting decisions more than in election cycles dating back to 1976, the Pew survey found. "This gap in terms of the correlation with the vote has been around for a long time, but it's never been larger," says Pew's Carroll Doherty. "This divides Obama and Romney voters perhaps more cleanly than any other issue."
The Pew findings follow a Gallup poll released a week ago that also suggests that Romney's anti-government line might find favor with a majority of Americans. That poll, conducted from September 6 to 9 – well before news of the Romney video had spread – asked 1,017 U.S. adults whether the government is doing too many things that should be left to individuals and businesses or should be doing more "to solve our country's problems." It found that 54 percent said the government is doing too much – about the same as the 53-plus percent Romney was, in essence, referring to as reachable – while 39 percent say the government should do more to solve the country's problems.
And while the partisan split on the question is predictable – 82 percent of Republicans say it's doing too much, while 67 percent of Democrats say it should do more – independents tend to fall on the side of smaller government, with 62 percent in the Gallup poll agreeing that government is trying to do too many things that should be left to individuals and businesses. Only 29 percent believe the government should be doing more.
Pollsters note that Americans have consistently tended to prefer the idea of smaller government, and only rarely have said that government should do more. "Other people have asked this question over the years and for the most part, with few exceptions, you get majorities on the side of smaller government with fewer services," says Pew's Carroll Doherty.
The proper size and role of government has been the subject of public and political debate in the U.S. since even before the country was founded and has come to the fore again and again over the last 50 years. Romney's themes are certainly familiar. In accepting the Republican presidential nomination in 1964, Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater – the original "Mr. Conservative" – said, "I know that the road to freedom is a long and a challenging road. I know also that some men may walk away from it, that some men resist challenge, accepting the false security of governmental paternalism…. We must assure a society here which, while never abandoning the needy or forsaking the helpless, nurtures incentives and opportunity for the creative and the productive."
And with the country mired in economic malaise, President Reagan famously told the nation in his 1981 inaugural address that "government is not the solution to our problems; government is the problem."
Romney may not seem the likeliest of candidates to carry that mantle, but he has tried to capitalize on those sentiments and shift his videotaped "47 percent" comments – which even conservatives like Bill Kristol derided as "arrogant and stupid" – back into a broader battle about the role of government. In the days since the videotape was posted on the website of Mother Jones magazine, Romney has sought to draw a sharp contrast between what he calls Obama's "government-centric" view and his own view that "government works best when it creates the space for individuals and families to pursue success and achieve great things."
"The president's vision is one of a larger and larger government with trillion-dollar deficits that promises everything to everyone," Romney told CBS's "60 Minutes" in an interview that aired Sunday. "That's the course that he has laid out. His policy for the economy is more stimulus, more government spending. My course is very different than that. Mine says make government smaller. Don't build these massive deficits that pass debt on to our kids, rebuild the foundation of America's strength with great homes, great schools, with entrepreneurship and innovation. Keep government as a, if you will, facilitator of freedom in America. But don't have government take away the rights and the freedoms of the American people."
The Gallup poll suggests Romney may have work to do in convincing Americans, though, as the portion of Americans who want government to do less has fallen from 61 percent earlier this summer. And Americans seem evenly divided, according to Gallup, on whether government has too much power, with a slim majority saying that it does – down from 59 percent in 2010.
The bigger problem Romney may face is the inevitable need to get specific about cuts, because while a majority of Americans may like the idea of shrinking government it's much harder to find a consensus on where and how much to slash. "When you get to the specifics of how to reduce the size of government there's a lot more disagreement," says Doherty. "The public still has a long way to go in terms of making that leap from support of smaller government in principle to actually supporting cuts in specific programs."
Reagan succeeded by keeping the debate "at a philosophical level," says Julian Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. "I don't think Romney has been as skilled," he says. Romney's choice of Rep. Paul Ryan to be his running mate hasn't helped, Zelizer says, because it brought Ryan's specific proposals for Medicare and the federal budget into the campaign. "It's about the framing," says Zelizer. "Mitt Romney is trying hard to get away from some of the particulars and hoping to gain traction again that way."
Yuval Rosenberg is the Business+Economy editor at The Fiscal Times. Subscribe to The Fiscal Times free newsletter.
More from The Fiscal Times
- After Many Gaffes, Debates Are Romney's Last Stand
- Republicans Brace for 4 More Years of Obama
- Don't Count on a Real Tax Cut If Romney Is Elected
Almost everyone is for a smaller, less wasteful government. However, no one, especially members of Congress, want to give up their favorite programs or pork barrel projects. Sen. Tom Coburn publishes a book every year outlining wasteful spending. Here are some examples from his 2011 edition, and these don't even cover the really big things like the "War of Drugs", Medicare fraud, Food Stamp fraud, DOD waste, tax cheating, ag subsidies, ethanol subsidies, purchasing waste, and on and on.
1. Politicians Partying on the Taxpayer Dime – (Presidential Election Campaign Fund) $35.38 Million
2. Mangled Mango Effort Could Hurt Farmers It Meant to Help – (Pakistan) $30 Million
3. Poor Planning Hobbles Air Force Green Energy Effort – (Department of Defense) $14 Million
4. Subsidy Program for Small Airports Fails to Help Most Recipients Achieve Sustainable Air Service – (Federal Aviation Administration) $6 Million
5. Paying for Pancakes – (Washington, D.C.) $765,828
6. The Super-Bridge to Nowhere –(Alaska) $15.3 Million
7. Dead Federal Employees Continue to Get Benefits Checks – (U.S. Office of Personnel Management) $120 Million
8. Extreme Home Makeover: Federal Highway Funds to Transform Abandoned ―Rock House‖ into Visitors Center –(Oklahoma) $529,689
9. Video Game Preservation – (New York) $113,277
10. Millions In Foreign Aid to… China?– (Department of State & U.S. Agency for International Development) $17.80 Million
11. Drug-Themed “Mellow Mushroom” Pizza Restaurant – (TX) $484,000
12. Fruit Growers Receive Money for Celebrity Chef Show in Indonesia –(WA) $100,000
13.Remake of“Sesame Street” for Pakistan – (U.S. Agency for International Development) $10 Million
14. Money for Magic Museum – (MI) $147,138
15. Critics Question Why Taxpayer Money Went to an International Architecture Firm – (CA) $1 Million
16. Back in the USSR! Documentary About How Rock and Roll Contributed to the Collapse of the Soviet Union – (CA) $550,000
17. TVs and Gas Generators for Rural Vietnamese Villages – (PA) $702,558
18.The 2nd Annual Hawaii Chocolate Festival – (HI) $48,700
19.Children, Prisoners, and Others Who Don’t Own Homes Awarded Energy Efficient Home Improvement Tax Credits (Internal RevenueService) – $1 Billion
20.Stimulating Online Soap Operas – (Department of Commerce) $936,818
After this election, pollsters will go back to the drawing board to figure out how they could have been so far off base.
Americans are fed up with waste, spending, debt, unemployment, wars, big government, high fuel & food prices; broken promises, outlandish White House spending sprees, a barrage of liberal lies and half-truths; Libya attack coverups; what have I missed?
The 2008 elections were a sign of things to come, IMHO.
the polls are so bias and just plain fake and made up numbers!
they pretend his majesty has already won! that's what they want
people to think! it's bogus! it's ****! it's typical liberal hogwash!
notice none of the bias media is doing any stories on obama's failed
agendas! none of high energy food gas prices! none on the violence!
none on the failed stimulus and gm bankrupt bailout and chevy volt!
none on the amount of people on foodstamps and welfare! anybody
who votes for this guy is getting freebies and wants to stay on the gravy
train or left wing liberal nutjob or 1% rich liberals who are getting stimulus
money and bailouts and political favors!!!!
WATCH THE VIDEO OF THE RACIST OLD BLACK WHORE YAPPING
ABOUT OBAMA GIVING HER AND ALL THE BLACKS FREE PHONES
AND HE'S GONNA GIVE THEM MORE FREE STUFF FOR THEIR VOTES!
REALLY WHAT A SHOCK? THERE'S MORE VIDEO OUT THERE IF YOU
WANNA SEE WHAT THE OBAMA VOTER REALLY IS! BLOODSUCKERS!
LAZY GARBAGE! ANYBODY GETTING ANY FREE GOVT ASST SHOULDN'T
BE ALLOWED TO VOTE TIL THEY GET OFF OF IT!
What does the middle class think of that?
Another point for you financial wizards of the Republican Party. France just raised their tax rate on Millionaires to 75% !!! Wow, I guess they will be looking for tax shelters in the US!!! And you people think your 33% rate (or 15% for 'Investors') is outrageous?!! You need to get back into the 'real world'. You have been living in Wonderland for little too long. There is a reason for a 'progressive' tax structure - its called FAIRNESS. I pay for the roads you use for your business, I pay for the airports you use, for your police protection, for education for your workers, for the water systems and the sewers that collect your $hit. Don't ever tell me you did it yourself. Most of the places in Alaska are just wilderness - you should go there and "Do it all by yourself!" What a laugh!
The thing is, Obama doesn't advocate bigger government either. That's just a myth, perpetrated by the Republicans, to scare people into thinking big goverment is threatening to control them all. And they'd say that about any Democrat president. They just try and make it look even scarier with Obama, because he's black, and has a foreign sounding name. Really dopey, when you think about it.
Anyway, look at Bush-Cheney, and try and argue small government. The whole thing makes no sense. I think what people should be giving deeper thought to, even though I understand it's a chore for many, is what kinds of government are good for the people and the upward progress of this country, and which kinds are harmful, benefitting only the relative few at the top?
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Breaking up big banks is an untested solution to the too big to fail problem that attempts to isolate and dismantle large, troubled institutions while protecting the rest of the economy.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
[BRIEFING.COM] The S&P 500 has climbed past its morning rebound high amid relative strength in technology.
The tech sector has crossed into positive territory as major components were able to shake off the early weakness. Apple (AAPL 443.35, +2.00), IBM (IBM 208.28, +1.29), and Cisco Systems (CSCO 23.54, +0.21) are all up between 0.4% and 0.9%.
Also of note, Hewlett-Packard (HPQ 24.12, +2.89) is soaring 13.6% ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|