Do rich people create jobs?

One multimillionaire gives a controversial speech saying that only consumer demand, and not the wealthy class, will help jobs grow.

By MSN Money Partner May 17, 2012 2:21PM
Image: Wealthy couple (© Digital Vision/Getty Images)Updated 3:30 p.m. ET

By Jonathan Berr


Sorry, Republicans, but rich people are not "job creators." They never have been and never will be. No one ever invests in anything to create jobs. Employing people is a by-product of capitalism.

Those are the views of the venture capitalist Nick Hanauer, a multimillionaire who was recently invited to speak at a TED conference. The conferences are well-known gatherings featuring talks on a variety of topics and can be viewed online.

Update: Initially, Hanauer's speech was not posted online, which spurred a controversy that TED reacted to Thursday. The speech appeared on YouTube Thursday, and you can see it here.

Rich people don't create jobs, nor do businesses, large or small. What does lead to more employment is a "circle of life" like feedback loop between customers and businesses. And only consumers can set in motion this virtuous cycle of increasing demand and hiring. In this sense, an ordinary middle-class consumer is far more of a job creator than a capitalist like me.

Hanauer added this little zinger as well: "So when businesspeople take credit for creating jobs, it's a little like squirrels taking credit for creating evolution. In fact, it's the other way around."

The views of Hanauer, who made his fortune as an early investor in Amazon (AMZN), are not that radical.

The Republican focus on cutting taxes for millionaires and billionaires is all wrong. For one thing, wealthy people -- ones with smart investment advisers -- know to put a good chunk of money in tax-free investments such as municipal bonds. Some also minimize their tax burden by putting their money in off-shore tax havens. If those people paid less in taxes, odds are that the windfall would wind up in those accounts. Few, if any, jobs would be created.

Another flaw in the Republican argument is the idea that the rich have an onerous tax burden. As The New York Times noted earlier this year, the tax burden paid by the wealthiest Americans has fallen significantly over the past few decades. Warren Buffett, among others, has made similar points.
 
"Between 1985 and 2008, the wealthiest 400 Americans saw the percentage of their income paid in federal income taxes drop from 29% to 18%," the paper reported, citing data from the Internal Revenue Service.

Income inequality should become the central issue of the presidential campaign. Heck, it should be the most important issue of the 21st century. I am not holding my breath for that to happen.

After deeming Hanauer's talk too political, perhaps TED organizers should change the conference motto from "Ideas worth spreading" to "Guardians of conventional wisdom."

TED curator Chris Anderson wrote a long response to the controversy Thursday, saying essentially that the speech just wasn't very good. The audience at TED that heard it gave it mediocre ratings, Anderson said. "Our policy is to post only talks that are truly special," he added. "And we try to steer clear of talks that are bound to descend into the same dismal partisan head-butting people can find every day elsewhere in the media."

-- Follow Jonathan Berr on Twitter @jdberr.

248Comments
May 20, 2012 8:24PM
avatar
Think of it this way.  You're a doctor with a private practice.  The government gives you a tax break which, of course, is really a subsidy, because the rest of us have to make up what you're not paying - soldiers have to be paid (so your business is shielded within a secure democracy), roads have to be built (so your patients can reach you), etc.  Are you going to run out and hire another doctor to share your workload because you received a tax break?  Or are you going to wait until more patients start showing up - so many you can't reasonably handle them by yourself?  That's what they mean when they say that demand, not tax cuts, creates jobs.  They're absolutely correct but, of course, the self-serving 1% and their sycophants scream to the heavens at the thought - you know, the guys who talk about personal responsibility and small government, until they want a subsidy or need a bailout.
May 20, 2012 7:57PM
avatar

The idea by the world monetary/g8 folks is not for American job creation. "We have to much" of the wealth according to that group. So we have to share the "wealth" and let the underdeveloped parts of the world catch up. {Sound familar}

 In plain terms,"We ain't gettin' nothing" cause we got too much.

May 19, 2012 5:52PM
avatar
im missing something then. How is lowering labor cost by exporting american jobs somehow creating jobs here.if demand is what fuels profits and consumption we should be doing exactly the opposite of free trade. Unions force a corporation to part with a fair share of the profits which in turn fuels consumption and more profits. Tariffs protect a unions leverage to negotiate a living wage. Why is our government doing all it can to destroying labor. There are too many pieces missing here.somethings going on behind the seans.the people running our government are highly intelligent so if theyre pushing destructive policies theres a reason.i dont know what it is.but there is a reason
May 19, 2012 3:46PM
avatar
Amzn is an old kid on the block how' are their earnings doing does it cover its capitalization or still the same that promises beat expectation buy a penney?
May 19, 2012 3:31PM
avatar
Well yeah they create jobs for the yacht builders, private plane buildrs,  luxury car buiders, diamond mines, gold mines mansions buildrs, captain of their yachts planes, trickle to cleaners including their swimming pools down to their toilets. Too many to list. They may be consumibng as much as 64% equal their wealth holdings.
May 18, 2012 9:07PM
avatar

OK, evreryone of you Bush, Rich haters.  and anyone else who thinks the Bush Tax plan should be allowed to expire soon.

I hope you are saving some money and I hope you can read.  Right now you owe $3700.00 less in yearly taxes than you will when the bush  tax era expires.  the Bush plan allows everyone of you $3700.00 less in taxes than the IRS show amount due.

also don't sell your house or property.  that will have a new sales tax added.  Thats right, a new 3% sales tax is being introduced and will take effect in 18 months.  so go ahead, piss off everyone in DC off by telling them you want vote for them then watch them pass this sales tax before they leave office.  Why arent you fighting for lower taxes for the middle class instead of cutting the leggs out from under YOUR boss, YOUR company the people that pays you? OR does your money come from the lower income people  DO you get a crazy check from uncle sam?..

May 18, 2012 4:49PM
avatar

Job Creators.... trickle down economics....   buzzwords with no meaning. 

 

Republicans do have SOME good ideas but they are so extreme it makes them look like whack jobs.

 

Until america calls their bluff and votes them out across the board they will keep making the rich richer.

 

If they wanted to be smart and truly have everyone's best interest at heart they would (1) let bush era cuts expire on the top two tiers.   Then ask for a law that says you can't get back what you don't put in.  Hence if you only put in $1,000 in taxes that's all you're getting back. No more 3 kids $7,500 checks to the person who doesn't work. (EIC /Child Tax Credit) 

May 18, 2012 3:41PM
avatar

Nick Hanuaer, just another example of liberal thought process coming from a man born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He says he's started dozens of Companies and hired 1000s of employees, yet he doesn't create jobs because if his prices are too high, no one will buy and his jobs will be gone.

What a crock of SH**. He really doesn't get it.

He probably thinks we need more USPS (US Postal Service) jobs, because they continue to work even while losing millions/quarter.

Let's tax more, let the govt spend more to enable consumers to create jobs.

Is he really serious!! Jonathan Berr bought it hook, line, and sinker.

May 18, 2012 2:38PM
avatar
Well Jonathan - You just exposed yourself as a liberal socialist!  Now I understand why you can't get anything right in your articles! Go back to sucking on the government teat!
May 18, 2012 12:12PM
May 18, 2012 11:49AM
avatar
"The Republican focus on cutting taxes for millionaires and billionaires is all wrong."

Well this shows how smart you are Jonathan. Just another political hack. Republicans aren't FOCUSED on cutting taxes for the rich. They just don't want to raise them on ANYONE rich or poor.

Second, you have one rich guy that makes a quote of his OPINION. That isn't a foundation for an argument. When that rich guys goes on vacation or buys a jet, he is spending his wealth and that creates jobs. Every dollar you take from him is one less dollar he could possibly spend as a consumer. I love small businesses. I really do. But I HATE those signs and promotions that talk about buying from a small business helps send a kid to dance class blah blah blah. You don't think the managers and employees of Wal-Mart and Home Depot have kids? It is just silly. Every time you spend $1, you are helping the workers and their families of that place as well as indirectly their suppliers and the places those workers' families shop.

True that when the government takes our money in taxes, they spend it as well. Unfortunately though they are far less efficient than a consumer. We are lucky if we see $0.50 for every $1 they take as they spend billions upon billions supporting foreign governments and pay interest on our debt of which a decent chunk goes to China and other foreign countries. True also that if I buy a TV made in Japan, part of my $1 eventually goes to Japan but on average the consumer is FAR more efficient than any government can possibly be.

Republicans fight to keep the money in the hands of those that EARN the money where it can more efficiently be spent. This is true no matter how much you EARN, rich or poor.

May 18, 2012 11:39AM
avatar
Business enterprises are created to make money (profit). If they are successful they can invest in the community, if they arn't they can't. If the goods or services the business offers are wanted by the consuming public they will have  to hire to meet demand. The demand this business enterprise creates is either new demand (a brand new good or service not seen before in the market) or disruptive demand (an improved good or service, disrupting demand for existing goods or services). In order to start this busnisess enterprise one needs capital, borrowed or invested. Poor people are often poor credit risks and often can't borrow adequately, even in loose credit markets. In order to grow the economy (new growth and disruptive) business must assume risk. The reward for this risk is profit. Which is good. The question is how to stimulate growth. It may not be possible in the modern economy to stimulate demand. It is certainly not possible to stimulate demand through public spending while at the same time increasing risk (regulation, uncertain tax environment). Growth can be stimulated on the supply side, reduction of risk, incresing the likelyhood of new or disruptive business with the potential of reward, which leads to hiring and community investments. Rich people do not create jobs, however rich people willing to take a risk in new or disruptive business enterprises do. It is the byproduct of risk taking. We need the rich, the more the better, we should not forget that.      
May 18, 2012 10:56AM
avatar
Ok ,enough of the BS... Jonathan Berr is an idiot. After 50 years in the business community ,and having created over 500 jobs (how many have you created Jonathan?) I can tell you that if you work 3 jobs to put your self through college your prospective is different from Jonathan's. Yeah, I MADE SOME MONEY ( I Paid a lot in taxes as well,NOT LIKE THE 51% OF THOSE WHO PAY NO FED TAX) and not like thoe who suck at the public tit. Look at the insanity of J B's writing. Either he is intentionally lying or he is un-educated. Other than your opinion J B what do you produce? How have you made others lives better?   What jobs have you created? It is easy to sit and shoot at others who build things ,create things,, pay taxes  and down grade them for thier success. Shame on you J B
May 18, 2012 10:39AM
avatar

Facked-Up (WITH IT)

Where did you get your education?  You sound dumber than I the un-educated dumb *ss as you called me.  Are all the money in the bank deposit by riches.  People can borrow money from friends and families too..  Riches people make money off poor/middle class people.  They just carve the profit with so much greeds they ruin  the "circle of life" like feedback loop between customers and businesses.  After they have control of the economy they ruin this country by outsource to other countries because of their greeds.  And whom bailed out who lately?

 

May 18, 2012 9:58AM
avatar

NO LAWS-lifeishell..

I almost fell out of my chair laughing at your TOTALLY un-educated, mis informed comments
You said the middle class or poor and/or consumers borrow money or get loans to create a business so they can create jobs.  Where do you think they borrow money from??? the POOR or low income, middle class.   Looks like the so-called rich are still creating  the jobs even when  only one person who is borrowing the money to start a business.    What a dumb A- --

May 18, 2012 9:51AM
avatar

Most of my husbands customers are very well off.  This creates his Business and for him to employ  people which increases consumer spending. Because of the Unions we are being taxed more. Many of my husband's customers companies have left Connecticut. The Unions don't want to compromise so the companies can no longer stay in business.

May 18, 2012 7:26AM
avatar
The key words he used...circle of life...feedback loop....consumers need to start consuming...but w/o jobs and money no consumption can start...and w/o consumption no new jobs occur. This is what i see too...i'd agree. what needs to happen is an expanse in investment capital..(loans) to get the ball rolling on new novel ideas- products....which ARE kind of centered around the wealthy and educated to initiate the process....but i think the wealthy and educated are smart to lay low right now....wait out what's happening in the financial global markets. It's not a pretty picture out there right now...i too would be fleeing to gold and silver hard-core assets to weather the storm coming.
May 18, 2012 1:28AM
avatar
Damn, so many dumbs literal peoples fighting the article in claiming they the riches create jobs.  The article is right.  It  said the demands/consumers create jobs.  And if you study the consumers, most of them are the middle class, which is  the majority of the population.  Do you think your business would last if there is no consumer for your products or services?  If there are demands/consumers, anyone, even poor people can create jobs too by taking loan!  To spawn consumers, people must have money to spend.  So you give them a chance to make money by having factories here.   Then people made money from woking in shoes factory can buy shirt, and people made money from shirt factory can buy shoes.  If all the factories are in China, all the money will end up in China, unless we print more money.
May 17, 2012 9:06PM
avatar

Skyhawk,

you have it 100% correct,  that is about the govt. creating jobs.  Lets see, there is the Post Office,  Fannie mae, freddy mack, AIG  Iraq,  Oh I think you can figure the rest. OH, I forgot that SOLOR whatever company that cost several millions

May 17, 2012 8:54PM
avatar

Rick...  it looks like you are useing some of Gates products to bitch.

Thats how he got rich, you bought it.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.

Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

RECENT QUOTES

WATCHLIST

Symbol
Last
Change
Shares
Quotes delayed at least 15 min
Sponsored by:

MARKET UPDATE

NAMELASTCHANGE% CHANGE
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.
NAMELASTCHANGE% CHANGE
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.

[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages ended higher across the board as the S&P 500 advanced 0.8%.

Equities climbed steadily since the opening bell as investors prepared for tomorrow's policy decision from the Federal Reserve. Although chatter in recent weeks has included speculation the Fed would look to taper its asset purchases, today's broad gains suggest investors expect mostly reassuring words from Chairman Bernanke at tomorrow's press conference.

All ten sectors ended with ... More


Currencies

NAMELASTCHANGE% CHANGE
There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.