After Sandy, will Romney support FEMA?
The Republican candidate's comments last year about the Federal Emergency Management Agency are coming back to haunt him.
Mitt Romney’s comments in the early stages of the presidential campaign about the Federal Emergency Management Agency came back to haunt him Monday as Hurricane Sandy made landfall with a vicious power.
At a GOP primary debate in June of 2011, the former Massachusetts governor endorsed shifting the responsibilities of FEMA to state governments and private companies.
"Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that’s the right direction," Romney said in response to a question about the agency. "And if you can go even further, and send it back to the private sector, that's even better."
The Romney campaign has since explained away the comments in statements to media outlets as an argument for states to take the lead on disaster relief. But the former Massachusetts governor went a step further during the debate and argued that expenditures by FEMA -- which not only provides aid but helps rebuild local economies after a natural disaster -- contributes to the national debt.
"Instead of thinking, in the federal budget, what we should cut, we should ask the opposite question: What should we keep?" Romney said. "We should take all of what we're doing at the federal level and say, what are the things we're doing that we don't have to do? And those things we've got to stop doing, because we're borrowing $1.6 trillion more this year than we're taking in."
FEMA acquired a terrible reputation during the Hurricane Katrina fiasco in 2005, when 1,833 people died after the storm tore apart and flooded much of New Orleans and the coast along the Gulf of Mexico.
Within four days of the hurricane, President George W. Bush signed a $10.5 billion relief package, but the slow and disorganized response -- often broadcast live on television -- made FEMA the symbol of a dawdling and wasteful government bureaucracy. "FEMA has been here three days yet there is no command and control,” said Terry Ebbert, who was the director of homeland security for New Orleans during the hurricane. "We can send massive amounts of aid to tsunami victims but we can't bail out the city of New Orleans."
The political appointee running the agency, Michael Brown, quickly became the fall guy and the agency began to turn around in its response to the emergencies that have followed.
The FEMA Disaster Relief Fund spent almost $13 billion last year, leading to concerns that it could run dry. There were 99 major disaster declarations in 2011, compared to 81 in 2010 and 34 so far this year. As of August, a FEMA official told The Christian Science Monitor that the fund contained $1.5 billion.
However, the conservative Heritage Foundation concluded that the increase in major disaster declarations under Obama and President George W. Bush has little to do with Mother Nature. FEMA has become a "political pork-barrel spending agency," Matt Mayer, a visiting fellow at Heritage wrote last January.
House Republicans also took a firm stand last year against more funding for FEMA, if it required additional debt by the government. After a tornado struck Joplin, Mo., an earthquake shook the mid-Atlantic, and Hurricane Irene inflicted $19 billion worth of damage on the east coast, the agency was running dangerously low on money.
"Those monies are not unlimited. And what we’ve always said is we’d offset that which has already been funded," House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., told Fox News on Aug. 29. "Just like any family would operate when it’s struck with disaster, it finds the money it needs to, to take care of a sick loved one or what have you and then goes without trying to buy new car or put an addition onto the house."
Lawmakers reached a compromise in Sept. 2011 that provided less money for FEMA than advocated by Democrats without the spending cuts being pushed by Republicans.
The haggling drew criticism from prominent Republicans including New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie after his state was struck by Hurricane Irene.
"You’re going to turn it into a fiasco like that debt-limit thing, where you’re fighting with each other for eight or nine weeks. And you expect the citizens of my state to wait?" Christie said at the time. "They’re not going to wait. And I’m going to fight to make sure that they don’t."
President Obama called Christie on Monday as flooding from Hurricane Sandy swallowed Atlantic City. This time, Christie complimented FEMA for its excellent performance.
Romney announced, according to the Associated Press, that he may go to New Jersey later this week to tour the wreckage caused by the storm.
Josh Boak is a national correspondent at The Fiscal Times. Subscribe to The Fiscal Times' FREE newsletter.
More from The Fiscal Times
Instead of collecting can goods he should have sent the Red Cross a million dollar check.
Didn't he say private sector and the states should handle natures wraths. Well he can be the first private citizen to chip in and help those in need with a million dollar donation to Red Cross.
Romney is so fake it's pathetic.
The sad I mean truly sad part about all of this is that M. Romney will flip-flop on this issue too. It just depends on the audience in front of him... Time to keep moving forward and onward... No more backstepping and backslidding...
Go figure, then go vote...
Romney will say, "let NYC go bankrupt." His rich butt-buddies need the tax cuts more than we need another big city full of dem voters, in his warped estimation, as instructed by karl rove and the kock brothers. Hit the showers mittwitt, you've bled this country for all you're gonna get with your holdup of the GM bailout when you and your buddy Paul the vulture Singer bought out Delco, then hijacked the US for 15 billion to stop you from liquidating the company. You are scum, mittwitt, bring back the tens of millions you profitted on this deal and have hidden in the tax haven jersey isle near france. For the full story read the Nation magazine or Greg Palast's "billionaires and ballot bandits." and find out what kind of crook the gop has on their ticket this time. O'bomber is no jewel, but mittwitt is pure scum.
Sure he will ...................... NOW. lol
He will do just like he has done on every subject.
Act like he didn't say what he said a couple years ago. I have never seen a person or supporters that actually think people don't remember what he has said in the past on different subjects. Rommey will change views on a moments notice if it will fit the moment he in right now. lol
He sounds like he's going not out of concern, but it will make him look good in the public's
eyes. At least Obama seems like someone who truly concerns himself with others and wanting
to help, if and when catastrophes happen or when problems arise. Romney, I believe is only
after the White House
because it's probably the only thing he either hasn't done or that man has a REALLY, REALLY
In keeping with the way Romney has been going I am sure he doesn't give a hoot about the destruction of Sandy. He'll have to go to his three ring binders to see if she qualified for government help.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Breaking up big banks is an untested solution to the too big to fail problem that attempts to isolate and dismantle large, troubled institutions while protecting the rest of the economy.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
[BRIEFING.COM] A solid November employment report translated into a solid day of gains for the major averages. While there was some talk that the encouraging job growth raised the odds of the Fed announcing a tapering at its December meeting, the message of the markets today was either that it didn't believe there would be a tapering this month or that it doesn't fear a tapering this month.
It was just one day, yet there was ample meaning wrapped up in the connection that the 10-yr ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|