The fiscal cliff just got steeper
Obama's re-election portends a big fight over the national debt and lots of volatility in financial markets.
There's less uncertainty on the political landscape. But there's now more to worry about.
For a short while, Wall Street seemed to be fantasizing about a strong Republican showing in the 2012 elections, which would have brought single-party control to a notoriously fractious and dysfunctional government in Washington, D.C. That's one explanation for why the stock market had a banner day as voters were heading to the polls, rising by nearly 1 percent on a day when there was little tangible news to justify the gain.
But after a seemingly endless campaign and $6 billion worth of political spending, Americans voted to reelect President Obama, keep Congress more or less the way it's been, and continue the divided government that's been in place for the last two years. Many analysts considered that a worst-cast scenario in terms of resolving the "fiscal cliff," the huge set of tax hikes and spending cuts set to go into effect in 2013 if Washington doesn't come up with a better plan.
Since averting the cliff would require some kind of compromise between Democrats who control the White House and Senate, and Republicans who control the House of Representatives, a continuation of the status quo suggests that the same spiteful partisan squabbling that already dominates Washington will suffuse negotiations over cutting the deficit and starting to pay down the $16 trillion national debt.
"A status quo outcome will be viewed as a disappointment, and markets may sell off somewhat in the short run," wrote David Joy, chief market strategist for Ameriprise Financial, in a brief analysis of the election's consequences. "It will be viewed as an outcome which offers the prospect for continued partisan bickering on a budget deal, and which increases the likelihood of brinksmanship on the fiscal cliff."
Many analysts assumed that a Republican sweep, including control of both houses of Congress, would have raised the likelihood of a deal to rescind most or all of the tax increases scheduled to go into effect in 2013—which amount to about $545 billion. But Obama wants to raise taxes on the wealthy, which Republicans have said they won't tolerate.
That portends a nasty standoff similar to the meltdown that occurred when the U.S. borrowing limit needed to be raised in the summer of 2011, and bitter partisan wrangling went till the very last second. The borrowing limit did get raised, but the needless 11th-hour drama—plus the collapse of a broader deal to corral the mushrooming national debt—led to the first-ever downgrade in the U.S. credit rating. Over the next month, the stock market fell by seven percent.
So it's little wonder that Wall Street expects more of the same when an even bigger set of deadlines hits at the end of the year. "In a scenario in which the political makeup inside the beltway is largely unchanged from last summer, we expect an intense battle," investment bank UBS advised clients in a research note ahead of the election.
There are still plenty of ways that a divided Washington could steer clear of the cliff and spare the economy another unneeded shock. President Obama, who hasn't staked out a strong stance on deficit reduction, could grant House Republicans a few of their priorities—which mostly involve spending cuts—in order to reach a compromise. Chastened Republicans might show a stronger inclination to solve problems rather than scoring political points. Business leaders, who have been heavily lobbying for a solution, might finally bang some sense into the politicians.
But none of that will happen for a while, if it happens at all. In the meantime, brace for a few weeks that may be the bumpiest of the year so far. The election is over, but the fighting probably isn't.
More from U.S. News
GlennB et al write about "doing the people's will" as though everyone had the same interests. Well, they don't, and that's why we (mercifully) have gridlock. Yesterday's election changed just about nothing.
There still is a large faction that doesn't want taxes raised - it thinks the government will just spend more money badly, and trash the economy simultaneously.
There's still a class-envy faction that thinks that making the rich poorer without raising serious money will make everyone feel better.
How about a compromise? This one will never happen, but it would shut up all sides for a few minutes. Restore the Clinton tax rates - all of them, AND reduce spending programs to the percentage of GDP that they were in the beloved Clinton years. If you want to change priorities, fine, but the total can't exceed 21% of GDP.
Any takers? Not likely, right? That's because there is no "will of the people" concensus.
YEA, WE CAN NOW KISS WHAT THIS COUNTRY WAS GOODBY AND IT'S ABOUT TIME. MAYBE NOW WE CAN SOLVE SOME OF OUR REAL PROBLEMS.
FOREIGN MANUFACTURING IMPORTS
BIRTH CONTROL (REALLY)
BOUT TIME THE VOTERS OF THIS COUNTRY USED SOME COMMON SENSE AND DUMPED THE TEA BAG CRAZIES AND BIRTHERS.
ONWARD AND UPWARD!
Allow me to sum up so many of the hyperbolic posts here today....
Wall Street was going down no matter what happenned. They were set in manipulation mode and were set to take away all gains for the year no matter what news good or bad happenned. Plain and simple!!! It has been a con game of there's for decades. Noting happenned in 24 hours that they didnt know before today!!
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Breaking up big banks is an untested solution to the too big to fail problem that attempts to isolate and dismantle large, troubled institutions while protecting the rest of the economy.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
[BRIEFING.COM] Although the Dow Jones has been able to climb back to its flat line, the S&P 500 remains pressured by the influential energy, industrial, and financial sectors as the three groups trade with losses between 0.2% and 0.6%.
In the industrial sector, transportation-related stocks have shown weakness as the Dow Jones Transportation Average trades lower by 0.7%. Truckers have shown weakness across the board while airlines trade in mixed fashion. Nasdaq -7.56 at ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|