The fiscal cliff just got steeper
Obama's re-election portends a big fight over the national debt and lots of volatility in financial markets.
There's less uncertainty on the political landscape. But there's now more to worry about.
For a short while, Wall Street seemed to be fantasizing about a strong Republican showing in the 2012 elections, which would have brought single-party control to a notoriously fractious and dysfunctional government in Washington, D.C. That's one explanation for why the stock market had a banner day as voters were heading to the polls, rising by nearly 1 percent on a day when there was little tangible news to justify the gain.
But after a seemingly endless campaign and $6 billion worth of political spending, Americans voted to reelect President Obama, keep Congress more or less the way it's been, and continue the divided government that's been in place for the last two years. Many analysts considered that a worst-cast scenario in terms of resolving the "fiscal cliff," the huge set of tax hikes and spending cuts set to go into effect in 2013 if Washington doesn't come up with a better plan.
Since averting the cliff would require some kind of compromise between Democrats who control the White House and Senate, and Republicans who control the House of Representatives, a continuation of the status quo suggests that the same spiteful partisan squabbling that already dominates Washington will suffuse negotiations over cutting the deficit and starting to pay down the $16 trillion national debt.
"A status quo outcome will be viewed as a disappointment, and markets may sell off somewhat in the short run," wrote David Joy, chief market strategist for Ameriprise Financial, in a brief analysis of the election's consequences. "It will be viewed as an outcome which offers the prospect for continued partisan bickering on a budget deal, and which increases the likelihood of brinksmanship on the fiscal cliff."
Many analysts assumed that a Republican sweep, including control of both houses of Congress, would have raised the likelihood of a deal to rescind most or all of the tax increases scheduled to go into effect in 2013—which amount to about $545 billion. But Obama wants to raise taxes on the wealthy, which Republicans have said they won't tolerate.
That portends a nasty standoff similar to the meltdown that occurred when the U.S. borrowing limit needed to be raised in the summer of 2011, and bitter partisan wrangling went till the very last second. The borrowing limit did get raised, but the needless 11th-hour drama—plus the collapse of a broader deal to corral the mushrooming national debt—led to the first-ever downgrade in the U.S. credit rating. Over the next month, the stock market fell by seven percent.
So it's little wonder that Wall Street expects more of the same when an even bigger set of deadlines hits at the end of the year. "In a scenario in which the political makeup inside the beltway is largely unchanged from last summer, we expect an intense battle," investment bank UBS advised clients in a research note ahead of the election.
There are still plenty of ways that a divided Washington could steer clear of the cliff and spare the economy another unneeded shock. President Obama, who hasn't staked out a strong stance on deficit reduction, could grant House Republicans a few of their priorities—which mostly involve spending cuts—in order to reach a compromise. Chastened Republicans might show a stronger inclination to solve problems rather than scoring political points. Business leaders, who have been heavily lobbying for a solution, might finally bang some sense into the politicians.
But none of that will happen for a while, if it happens at all. In the meantime, brace for a few weeks that may be the bumpiest of the year so far. The election is over, but the fighting probably isn't.
More from U.S. News
I love how the media is saying the stock market is a response to the fiscal cliff. LMAO. Yeah, nobody knew about the fiscal cliff yesterday.
I can just see if the stock market rebounds, the headline will be : "Market sllides due to fiscal cliff; everyone realizes Obama was re-elected and that everything is going to be OK. 1 million jobs saved as market recovers.
Wall Street will be wall street trying to vent and manipulate the market and play the government to go their way.
Time for the greedy people and corporations to wake up and embrace the incoming reality. The middle class is taking a stand.
Wall Street will become irrelevant like the Reublicans if they don't wake up and embrace the the incoming reality.
Grow up people.
As long as the Republican party refuses to even admit that the country's demography is changing they can't win national elections.
There are no blue states trending toward red. There are red states trending toward blue. This can't be denied.
Stop going even further to the extreme right. Realize that the tea party tail is wagging the Republican dog. Nominate someone who doesn't have to pander to the extremists to get on the ticket and then look like such a flip flopper as he/she inevitably moves toward the center in the election.
There will be an election in two years. If the Republican party doesn't start looking more moderate as the population continues to change they risk further losses in the power chambers.
We are a nation of moderates. The Republican party needs to resemble the nation more.
Just shows the negitivity of Wall Street.
Get Positive, and so should our Congress.
Fix our problems not be the cause of our problems.
The Greedy, just want and want. Spoil themselves and there children
they are all entitled. The hell with everyone else.
I see it every day on the road, the lady driving her Mercedes speeding
cutting off people, because she thinks, she is better than anyone else
entitled to do what she wants.
Wall Street grow up.. Do what's right for the country for a change.
To Empty, Pete, Money, This is What I Think, VL
Congrats. You and your team put on a spanking. I may disagree with you are certain principles, but I don't think you are sooo far out there (like that fking rtrd urlemmings) that you would want to harm America. I'm hopeful for our country and OUR president, Obama. Lets keep America great.
GlennB et al write about "doing the people's will" as though everyone had the same interests. Well, they don't, and that's why we (mercifully) have gridlock. Yesterday's election changed just about nothing.
There still is a large faction that doesn't want taxes raised - it thinks the government will just spend more money badly, and trash the economy simultaneously.
There's still a class-envy faction that thinks that making the rich poorer without raising serious money will make everyone feel better.
How about a compromise? This one will never happen, but it would shut up all sides for a few minutes. Restore the Clinton tax rates - all of them, AND reduce spending programs to the percentage of GDP that they were in the beloved Clinton years. If you want to change priorities, fine, but the total can't exceed 21% of GDP.
Any takers? Not likely, right? That's because there is no "will of the people" concensus.
YEA, WE CAN NOW KISS WHAT THIS COUNTRY WAS GOODBY AND IT'S ABOUT TIME. MAYBE NOW WE CAN SOLVE SOME OF OUR REAL PROBLEMS.
FOREIGN MANUFACTURING IMPORTS
BIRTH CONTROL (REALLY)
BOUT TIME THE VOTERS OF THIS COUNTRY USED SOME COMMON SENSE AND DUMPED THE TEA BAG CRAZIES AND BIRTHERS.
ONWARD AND UPWARD!
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Breaking up big banks is an untested solution to the too big to fail problem that attempts to isolate and dismantle large, troubled institutions while protecting the rest of the economy.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
[BRIEFING.COM] There wasn't a lot of excitement in the stock market today and there is nothing wrong with that. After rallying in broad-based fashion on Friday, the major indices stood their ground (for the most part) amid a lack of conviction from buyers and sellers alike.
Today wasn't a case so much of the stock market going up as it was a case of some influential stocks going up to keep the major indices on a winning path. In fact, decliners were just about even with ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|