Are Americans ready for the fiscal cliff?
We should brace for higher taxes, reduced unemployment benefits, less hiring and pronounced market volatility.
By Rick Newman
It's tempting to tune out politics and the 2012 elections. Your time might be better spent getting a jump on holiday shopping. Or knitting a new sweater. Or watching Jersey Shore reruns.
But there's one bit of political theater people should be paying attention to, the so-called fiscal cliff. This is the big set of tax hikes and spending cuts that are set to go into effect at the end of the year, unless Congress intervenes. Like much of what goes on in Washington, the drama is unnecessary and perhaps even absurd. But the outcome could zap many Americans in the wallet.
A lot of political experts feel that Congress will come up with some kind of last-second deal that averts the worst-case scenario, which would be to do nothing and let all of those tax and spending provisions go into effect at once. That would lop as much as five percent off of GDP and promptly cause a recession. But there's no easy way around the decisions that need to be made, and Congress will probably enact at least a few of the measures set to go into effect. Here's what ordinary Americans ought to be preparing for:
A modest tax hike. The expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts, which comes at the end of this year, would represent a huge tax hike on working Americans, so Congress will probably put that off. But another temporary tax cut will probably be allowed to expire on schedule, which means most workers will experience a de facto tax hike starting January 1.
The payroll tax cut went into effect (in a slightly different form) in 2009, and it's already been extended for one year beyond its original expiration date. Basically, it cut the amount deducted from a typical paycheck to fund Social Security from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent. That saved the typical worker about $85 per month, or $1,000 per year. The maximum savings for higher earners was about $2,000 per year. That money will once again be deducted from paychecks if the tax cut lapses, a change that will reduce the take-home pay of about 160 million Americans.
Reduced unemployment benefits. Another program that's set to expire—and probably will—is the federal extension of unemployment benefits. This temporary stimulus measure extended the unemployed benefits offered by the states—which typically last for 26 weeks—to as many as 99 weeks. The program is already winding down, and if the federal benefits aren't renewed, people who get laid off in 2013 will qualify only for the basic state program.
Skittish employers. CEOs are losing confidence in Washington's ability to handle basic challenges, and they're concerned that Congress could end up hurting the economy rather than helping it. A recent survey of CEOs by the Business Roundtable showed that confidence in the economy has fallen markedly in recent months. Just 58 percent of CEOs expect sales to pick up over the next six months, compared with 81 percent who felt that way earlier this year. And just 29 percent expect their companies to be hiring, down from 42 percent.
That means hiring through the end of the year could be even weaker than it has been lately. When hiring is weak, raises tend to be scarce as well. And consumers worried about their paychecks spend less, so it's shaping up as another bleak holiday season for retailers and the workers who depend on them.
Federal cuts in jobs and benefits. A few weeks ago, the White House issued a detailed report on where the spending cuts will hit if they go into effect as currently planned. The biggest losers would be defense agencies and contractors, but most federal agencies would face budget cuts of 8 percent or so. The same goes for civic, nonprofit or private programs funded by the government. Those cuts might end up being smaller, or going into effect later, but either way, it seems likely that a lot of people dependent on a government check will have to deal with cutbacks.
Pronounced volatility. Wall Street analysts think the time around the end of the year could be similar to August, 2011, which was when a big, needless fight over extending the nation's borrowing limit led to the first-ever downgrade of the U.S. credit rating by Standard & Poor's. The stock market fell by 7 percent and took six months to recover its losses.
This time around, even a good outcome could have damaging consequences. Economists and CEOs might be relieved if Congress delays the tax hikes and spending cuts set to go into effect, but Moody's has said it will join S&P in cutting the U.S. credit rating if Congress makes no progress later this year in cutting its annual deficits. Financial markets might yawn, or they might convulse. It would be wise to prepare for both scenarios.
More from U.S. News & World Report
The way i see it, it doesn't matter who we put in office they are all actors in the 1% show and we line up to buy tickects and watch it. We are constantly blaming Republicans or Democrats and not really concerned on getting to the root of the problem. Yes the rich should be taxed a little higher, and most definitely government programs should be reformed if not cut. GREED and LAZINESS is what keeps us from moving foward.
Sorry, folks, but all this chatter and finger-pointing about politics and politicians and the PAST has nothing whatsover to do with the central point and, yes, the important question, of this article! The article is about the USA potentially falling off a financial cliff, and WHAT is likely to happen. To be sure, it names some politicians past and present (i.e.; expiration of Bush-era tax-cuts, the payroll tax-cut (2009 - Obama??? - reduction in Social Security taxes, etc.) - but in the CONTEXT of things like looming CHANGES in taxation at the Federal level.
What is going to HAPPEN is that folks - 160 million+ Americans - are going to PAY MORE TAX starting JAN 2013. And, for all who seem distracted by inate urges to blame folks and point fingers and shout for "flat tax" and other such stuff - those things are NOT the issue nor the point here! The issue is about what will happen...
That one is very very simple, and I think, quite frightening and significant: For my family, this may mean a total of about 4800 LESS that we can SPEND or SAVE or INVEST. Those dollars, which come out of my DISCRETIONARY INCOME, mean that I will NOT be spending 4800 in my local economy, supporting local businesses, nor supporting local HIRING for those businesses. Or contribute to charity. Ergo, these looming tax-hikes mean there will be less - a LOT less - money available to feed into any of those aspects of the economy. So, when I already see, for example, local restaurants struggling to get enough paying customers in to support their operations, I can only expect that those places, and their JOBS, will collapse in the next year. Ditto for all sorts of other businesses which rely heavily on DISCRETIONARY spending. You see, all the usual bills - the mortgage, food, utilities, insurance, healthcare, etc., will STILL HAVE TO COME FIRST, and as those won't go down in compensation for more tax - outlay, then those higher taxes come from whatever is left - that discretionary money.
Pretty simple, really! And, hey! I don't need to vent about "Obama did this" or "Bush did that" or whatever - beyond observing that yes, the US SENATE and HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES did NOTHING to solve this.
Budget cuts and raising taxes are fine until they begin to effect each voter-- Like ME ! <LOL>
This country is going down the slippery slope to economic armageddon and blame for this mess sets squarely on the American people who voted in these cast of clowns (Republicans & Democrats alike over the past two decades) that are inept at making hard decisions, especially those decisions that may impact whether the politician gets re-elected into their cushy jobs with outrageous salaries and benefits for life.
America can't continue to increase handouts to the rest of the world, its own citizens and its politicians infinitely without collapsing under the weight of these expenses and we are there today. I welcome the fiscal cliff as it will bring light to the day of reckoning... of course politicians will then have another 3 years to explain they had did not create the problem before their next re-election.
This is a government failure as a whole. Congress is as much at fault as the president is. Sequestration was supposed to motivate them to actually do something and find solutions to the problems. Unfortunately, they couldn't pull their heads out of their butts long enough to get the job done.
Now it's finger pointing all around still not getting anything done.
The way I see it, it doesn’t matter who we put in office they’re basically actors in the 1% show and we all line up to buy tickets and watch it. We constantly point fingers blaming Republican and Democrats instead looking at the root of the problem. The wealthy should be taxed a little more and a lot of government programs should be reformed or even cut! Greed and laziness is destroying our country.
What I would do
No government sponsored aid to foreign countries.
No prohibiting individual aid to a foreign country unless the country is an enemy.
No tax on wages. No tax on investments. Tax on sales only.
No aid to anyone who is not a citizen.
To be a citizen in full standing you must be born of two citizens or be born of one citizen on United States land. Being born of one citizen in a foreign country or being born in this country of two non citizens would give you the right of dual citizenship on your 18th birthday; you would not be entitled to any benefits you had not earned.
No elected or hired employee of the government would be exempt from any law.No government employee would be allowed to belong to a union.
If this was a TRUE constitutional government and a TRUE free enterprise system they would have there hands in nothing. Yet they control everything and then we ask "why isn't this working?"....well duh?!?
I think we should let it happen if it will set our Governments Finances back in order so we don't have to borrow so much money from our enimies. I also think if all the free government handouts stop, then all these free loaders (leeches) will go back to their own country. That would be a good thing to happen if you know what I mean.
I wonder if this one will post, this is the third time I have tried to post this comment..they don't let it go through. Remember, this site is an Obama site, and they always want our country to be destroyed, and put to its knees in from of the World.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Breaking up big banks is an untested solution to the too big to fail problem that attempts to isolate and dismantle large, troubled institutions while protecting the rest of the economy.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
[BRIEFING.COM] S&P futures vs fair value: -0.50. Nasdaq futures vs fair value: +4.20. The S&P 500 futures hover in-line with fair value after the November retail sales report (+0.7% actual, +0.6% Briefing.com consensus) boosted futures off their lows. The report also helped major European indices surge off their lows as they look to avoid registering losses for the third day in a row.
In addition to news regarding retail sales, participants received the weekly initial claims ... More
More Market News
|There’s a problem getting this information right now. Please try again later.|