US seniors risk outliving their money
A new study indicates that the elderly in 48 states and the District of Columbia won't be able to replace the recommended 70% of their pre-retirement income.
How much do we need for retirement? More than what we're currently saving, apparently.
A new study from Interest.com found that seniors in 48 states and the District of Columbia are at risk to outlive their retirement monies.
The golden years aren't all that golden: Nationally, the average income of the 65-and-older crowd is only 57% of the money earned by those aged 45 to 64.
"By anybody's definition, that's just not enough," says Mike Sante, managing editor at Interest.com.
"There's no reason to believe that seniors are living high on the hog in this country. At least most of them aren't."
Researchers also compared the two groups' median incomes with a specific number in mind: 70%, based on the notion that retirement income from all sources should total 70% of the salary you make during your last year or two of earning.
According to Sante, the retirees' income would ideally be 70% or more of the still-working younger cohort. That's because both middle-aged and elderly adults pay for many of the same resources, such as groceries, utilities and housing.
The magic number was found in just two states, Hawaii and Nevada, both of which were a hair over the 70% mark. Nineteen other states and the District of Columbia came in at 60% to 68% and the four lowest-ranking states (Massachusetts, New Jersey, North Dakota and Rhode Island) ranged from 45% to 49.5%.
"Many senior citizens are significantly underfunded and risk running out of money, especially since people are living longer," says Sante.
More and more are retiring with still-unpaid mortgages, he adds, and many underestimate the cost of age-related health issues: "Anybody who thinks that Medicare (will pay) all their bills hasn't been around anyone on Medicare."
Bracing for a crisis
It's tough to get by just on Social Security, and defined-benefit pensions are fading away. That leaves personal retirement planning and/or asset accumulation to make up the difference.
We're not doing too well at either one. A recent study from the Employee Benefit Research Institute notes, among other things, that 57% of U.S. residents have less than $25,000 in total household savings and investments (excluding their homes). That's up from 49% in 2008.
"Workers and employers in the U.S. are bracing for a retirement crisis, even as the stock market sits near highs and the economy shows signs of improvement," The Journal notes.
"(Powerful) financial and demographic forces are combining to squeeze individuals and companies that are trying to save for the future and make their money last."
Given rising life expectancies it's very possible to outlive any money you've saved. Companies that still offer pensions will experience sympathy pains, since longer lives mean more stress on pension funds -- as much as $97 billion worth in the coming years, according to The Journal.
A life-changing benefit
In a New York Times guest article, University of Chicago professor Richard H. Thaler proposed a relatively simple solution: Build a better workplace savings plan. He suggests a two-pronged approach:
Make payroll retirement savings universally available. Currently this is an option for about half of American workers (and only 42% in the private sector).
Make them automatic. According to Thaler, simple procrastination keeps about one-fifth of workers from enrolling in payroll savings even when offered employer matching funds. He believes employees should be enrolled automatically unless they specifically opt out.
The same inertia that now keeps people from opting in could keep future workers from opting out. Such automatic enrollment plans already exist, and companies that use them find that few employees make the effort to leave the program.
"The burden on employers would be tiny, and the benefit to workers could be life-changing," says Thaler, a professor of economics and behavioral science.
Take charge of the future
Maybe you think you can't afford to save for retirement on what you earn, especially if you have student loans or house payments.
But you can't afford not to -- and if you're young you have time (i.e., compound interest) on your side. Even if you can save only a tiny amount, do it anyway and plan to increase contributions as you get raises and/or pay down other obligations.
As I noted in "Is it ever too late to start saving?," it's terrifying (and at times paralyzing) to be in your late 40s with no savings at all. But retirement age is approaching, inexorably. You can't wish it away. It's crucial to start planning lest you hit 65 with little to no cushion.
No one will take care of the future you except the current you -- and since the average Social Security payment is $1,266 per month, the future you will be very glad you bothered.
And if you do nothing at all? The future you will judge the current you. Harshly.
Readers: Are you saving for retirement, either at work or on your own?
More on MSN Money:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
For example, home ownership vs rent isn't counted, nor is employer subsidized or low-large-company-rate health insurance.
if I didn't have my mortgage paid off or needed to rent an apartment I'd need at least $1000/month greater income to live at the same level I live now. If my very-large (low insurance rate) employer didn't pay 75% of my excellent BCBS health insurance - which becomes at 65 my Medicare Supplemental, Prescription, Dental, and Vision insurance, I'd need to spend at least $400 more per month on healthcare compared to Medicare A & B alone mainly because of the remaining prescription donut hole which my BCBS doesn't have.
That's roughly $17,000 per year in less needed spending - about 25% of my 2006 salary at retirement (when I was still in the last months of my mortgage) that's not taken into consideration at all. When you add in the no work-related costs, more time for comparison shopping and cooking for myself, etc I could life well on 50% of my preretirement income.
Seriously, if my sophomore, high-school, gifted and talented, chemistry students had left out the equivalent major considerations in their lab studies this study does, I'd have required a do-over with a grade penalty.
Nationally, the average income of the 65-and-older crowd is only 57% of the money earned by those aged 45 to 64
If you planned right, 57% is close to all you should need. People need to think when they take out a 30 year mortgage, did you plan so that you would have it paid off before you retire? I bet most people have not. Also, sock away savings every year to cover home maintenance expenses even when no repairs are needed. Obviously, there are certain pitfalls that cannot be accounted for. However, a high percentage of the population would do well if they followed a strict savings plan and lived well below their means.
The point people should take away from reading these types of articles is that you should have a plan for your retirement. The younger you start planning and investing the easier things will be when you get older. I am lucky both of my parents taught me at a young age the importance of saving and living within your means.
Like my parents, I have always been a good saver, but I was not a good investor until I was in my late thirties. I learned by trial and error how to invest and I become good at it. I have short term and long term goals. Like many people I have been laid off and had to start over again. I have learned it is easier to deal with life’s unexpected events by having a plan.
I live within my means. I do not have any debt and I keep an emergency fund for those unexpected rainy days. I am currently in my late fifties. I do not plan on retiring until at least another ten years. When I do retire I would like to live comfortably and have the funds to travel and enjoy life.
I am on target to achieve the retirement goals I have in place. It is easier to have peace of mind for when you retire if you have a plan. Have short-term and long-term goals. Live within your means. Plan for the unexpected and try to stay out of debt.
With Zero interest, Welcome to the world of Obama....
So many of the idiots that voted for Obama will not only have his debt to pay off, but will have to take care of the elder parents as well...
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.