6/10/2013 7:15 PM ET|
Smart moves to boost Social Security
Take these steps to increase lifetime benefits by thousands of dollars.
Until recently, the conventional wisdom was that total lifetime benefits for someone with average life expectancy would be the same whether the beneficiary took a smaller benefit at 62 or a larger benefit at 70. But a growing body of research shows that, even when one's life span is shorter than average, it may pay to delay for at least a couple of years past the early retirement age of 62.
For most married couples, for instance, delaying benefits until 70 for at least the higher earner is a no-brainer. By coordinating the dates they each claim benefits to take maximum advantage of spousal and survivor benefits, a husband and wife can boost lifetime benefits by hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Many singles can benefit from waiting, too, according to research by economist Sita Nataraj Slavov of the American Enterprise Institute, a think tank. Today's historically low interest rates play an important role.
Think of it this way. If you take Social Security at 62, you'll be able to limit tapping your IRA or other savings. That could make financial sense if the dollar in your nest egg today will be worth more next year.
But with U.S. Treasuries earning an after-inflation rate of 0%, collecting Social Security benefits early becomes a bad deal, says Slavov and co-author John Shoven, an economics professor at Stanford University. Social Security benefits grow an average of about 7% a year between 62 and 70, not including cost-of-living adjustments. That means you're earning a bigger return by delaying Social Security benefits than you are on your safe investments. And the inflation-adjusted "annuity" you're getting from Social Security is considerably better than any annuity you can buy on the commercial market during this low-interest-rate environment. "With today's interest rates, some degree of delay is advantageous even for people" with lower-than-average life expectancies, Slavov says.
Before you can make your own calculations, you need to understand the basics. If you were born between 1943 and 1954, you can collect your "primary insurance amount" at age 66. The full retirement age gradually rises to 67 for those born between 1955 and 1960, but for this story we'll assume 66 is the full retirement age.
You can start claiming at 62, but your benefit will be permanently reduced by a fraction of a percent for each month you claim before your full retirement age. Claim at 62, and your benefits will be cut 25% compared with what you would receive if you claim at 66.
You get a delayed retirement credit of 8% for each year you wait to claim past your full retirement age until 70. Say you're due $2,000 at your full retirement age of 66. If you claim at 62, you will get $1,500. Wait until 70, and your benefit jumps to $2,640 -- 76% more than the take-it-early benefit. (And that doesn't include the cost-of-living increases that add to the benefit while you wait.)
If you're married and your primary insurance amount is less than your spouse's, you can claim either a benefit on your own record or a "spousal" benefit. If the lower earner first claims at full retirement age, the spousal benefit is 50% of the other spouse's primary insurance amount. The lower earner can't claim a spousal benefit until the other spouse files for his benefit.
Actually, a spousal benefit is two benefits: the lower earner's own benefit plus a supplement so that the total received equals up to one-half of the higher earner's benefit. Here's an illustration from Mahaney: Ken and Mary are the same age. Ken is eligible for a full benefit of $2,000, while Mary qualifies for her own $600 benefit. After subtracting Mary's full benefit from one-half of Ken's $2,000 benefit, she's eligible for a $400 spousal benefit. If they both file at 66, she gets her $600 plus the $400 spousal amount.
The size of Mary's total benefit will be reduced if she files for her own benefit earlier. Say Ken waits until 66 to file for his full $2,000 benefit. In the meantime, at 62, Mary files for her own benefit, which is reduced by 25% -- to $450. When Ken files, Mary will get her $400 spousal benefit -- for a total of $850 a month.
If you're single
The cost-benefit analysis for singles is fairly straightforward. Delaying makes financial sense if you live long enough so that the extra amount you receive via fatter benefits more than makes up for the benefits forfeited during the waiting years.
Even if you live to average life expectancy, today's low interest rates change the equation for singles who delay, according to Slavov and Shoven. For a single woman with average life expectancy and a full retirement benefit of $1,500, the present value of her lifetime benefits would be $318,321 if she claims at 62, assuming a 0% interest rate. (Present value is the current value of a future sum.) That compares with $376,990 if she delayed until 70 -- for an 18% boost.
Why the difference? The authors say that when interest rates are close to 0% -- or even up to 2.9% -- the value of the future Social Security benefits is considerably higher than what you can receive if you placed the money in safe investments or an immediate annuity.
If you're married
Married couples can maximize their joint lifetime income by coordinating their start dates. A top goal for couples is to boost the benefit for the surviving spouse, who will get 100% of the higher earner's benefit when he dies if she takes the survivor benefit at or beyond her full retirement age. The benefit will include any of the higher earner's delayed retirement credits and cost-of-living adjustments. The widow or widower can claim a survivor benefit as early as age 60, but the benefit will be reduced if the survivor collects before full retirement age. For instance, by claiming at 60, the survivor will get 71.5% of the primary earner's benefit plus any delayed credits.
Wives tend to gain the most from strategies to boost the survivor benefit because they generally earn less than their husbands and live longer. Once her husband dies, the wife can step up, from either her own lower benefit or from a higher spousal benefit, to the even higher survivor benefit.
One of the most important rules of thumb for most married couples: If just one spouse is expected to live well beyond age 80, the couple's cumulative lifetime benefits will usually be highest if the higher earner delays claiming his benefits until 70, according to research by William Meyer and William Reichenstein, principals of consulting firm Social Security Solutions. (Kiplinger's has partnered with Social Security Solutions. Click here for more information on obtaining a customized report for optimizing your own benefits.)
Consider this example from Meyer and Reichenstein: Assume Alice and Sam are both 62. His primary insurance amount is $2,000, and his life expectancy is 80. Alice's full benefit is $700 and she is expected to live until she's 90. If they both claim at 62, they'll each get reduced benefits -- $1,500 for him, $525 for her -- until Sam dies at age 80. At that point, Alice steps up to a monthly survivor benefit for ten years. Total lifetime benefits: $635,400.
But say Sam delays until 70 while Alice still claims her benefit early -- at $525 a month. When Sam eventually claims, he'll get $2,640 a month, with his delayed retirement credits, until he dies. Alice will then step up to a $2,640 survivor benefit for the last ten years of her life. Total lifetime benefits: $747,000.
And, says Meyer, delaying by the higher earner makes even more sense if there's a big age difference between the two spouses. "The younger spouse may have a higher survivor benefit for a longer time if the older, higher-earning spouse dies early," Meyer says.
More from Kiplinger's:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Heck I could be Dead by 70. In your 60's you begin to fall apart my friends..... Knee's go, Hips Go, "Energy" goes, High Blood Pressure, You tend to Eat less, but weight creeps on to you anyway. For some Hearing goes, Eyes can too. I'm only waiting until 66 to max out my SSI Benefits and work only 3 days per week max until I can establish a home business on- line. .At age 66 they raise the max you can earn per year at $40k/Yr. without being heavily taxed.
Actually I think the Government would rather see you Dead 1st before you collect. No body is in that good a shape by 70. You'll see for yourself when you turn 60.
People like myself with several diseases and immune system dysfunction will never make it to 70.
I have always had a hard time knowing that people that have never contributed a dime to the Social Security System draw money from it. They need to be removed. I'm not saying this just to be mean but they need to be under a different program. This program was designed to help people with retirement.
If you want more money when it's your turn to reitre, this is the way. Don't let politicians play the stock market.......
I work in the Healthcare field and I am here to tell you that most people at the age of 70 don't have much quality of life left in them. If they have worked for the past 50-55 years of their life, there is not much left in them to enjoy what is left of their life. This is just my observation. I see alot of fairly young people very sick or dying in their 50's and 60's. Cancer has taken and continues to take alot of lives and fairly young ages. I don't plan on waiting until my full retirement age to retire. I would like to have a few years where my quality of life is good enough to enjoy some things that I would like to do. Thats just my opinion, but we are really being penalized for retiring at the age of 62. I think that if somebody works for 45 years of their life, then they paid their dues!!
I started taking mine as soon as I turned 62. I don't regret it for one second. Tomorrow's not promised to anyone.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.