7/20/2012 7:51 PM ET|
What you'll get in Social Security
Whether you’re years or decades away from retirement, here’s what you need to know about what you can expect from Social Security. Plus, tools to plan ahead.
Despite what you've heard, Social Security isn't going to disappear.
Many younger people, and even some older ones, are convinced the retirement system's coffers will run dry before they get a chance to claim benefits.
The reality is quite different. Even if Congress does nothing to fix the troubled system, and its trust fund is exhausted in about two decades, Social Security will still collect enough in payroll taxes to pay out 75% of promised benefits at that point.
Seventy-five percent isn't ideal, but it's sure better than nothing.
The system has other problems. The surplus that Social Security has built up over the years is invested in $2.7 trillion of special Treasury bonds. As payouts exceed tax revenue, Social Security will have to start cashing in those securities. The federal government will have to find the money to make good on the bonds, and that's going to put more pressure on the federal budget.
Even if you can imagine the United States defaulting on its debts -- and few experts believe we're at risk of a Greek-style crisis -- the fact remains that Social Security collects enough in taxes from current workers to pay most of the benefits it has promised.
There are a number of ways to fix Social Security so it could pay everything it has promised. One way would be to raise payroll taxes by 0.9% on both workers and employers. Another would be a series of smaller changes, which were recommended by a bipartisan Debt Reduction Task Force, including gradually increasing the full retirement age, slowing cost-of-living increases, slightly reducing benefits for top wage earners, boosting the amount of earnings subject to the payroll tax and bringing some newly hired state and local government workers into the system.
Creating private investment accounts, as some have suggested, wouldn't resolve the funding gap. What it would do is change the nature of the Social Security program, which was conceived as an insurance program, not an investment scheme. For those of us without traditional pensions, Social Security is the one part of our retirement income that we can't outlive or lose in the stock market.
To see what the Social Security system has promised you, you'll probably need to go online. Social Security used to send annual statements to every worker that included that person's earnings record over the years as well as how much he or she was estimated to receive in retirement. The system suspended the mailings to save money but has since resumed sending statements to workers 60 and older who haven't yet started to receive benefits.
Everybody else needs to:
Go here and create an account. The Social Security Administration uses Experian credit bureau data to help verify your identity, so in addition to your name, address, birth date and Social Security number, you'll need to answer some multiple-choice questions about data included in your Experian credit report. (If you've ever gotten your free credit reports online through AnnualCreditReport.com, you'll be familiar with the type of questions asked.)
Explore your benefits. Once you've created your account, you'll see your promised benefit at "full retirement age." That age, which used to be 65, has been inching up. This year, it's 66. It will rise to 67 for those born after 1959.
You can click on the "estimated benefits" link to get a fuller picture. The next tab will show you how much you can earn if you delay retirement to age 70; your benefit will rise 8% each year you delay. You can also see the lower amount you're scheduled to get if you retire early, at age 62. (More on that in a minute.)
Social Security is more than just a retirement system, of course. You also can see what monthly benefit you'd get if you were severely disabled and couldn't work. Further down, you'll find what your spouse and children would receive if you died.
If you're married, compare your estimates with your spouse's. The lower-earning spouse is entitled to up to half the higher-earning spouse's retirement benefit, if it's greater than his or her own -- something known as spousal benefits. If, for example, your wife would be entitled to $2,000 at full retirement age and your own check would be $750, you could opt to take half of her benefit ($1,000) instead. That would make your household benefit $3,000, rather than the $2,750 you two would get based on your own earnings records. Your spousal benefit would be reduced permanently if you applied before your own full retirement age, however.
The higher-earning spouse must have applied for benefits before the other can claim spousal benefits, but the higher earner has the option to "file and suspend" -- file for benefits, so his or her spouse can claim spousal benefits, and then suspend the application so that his or her own benefits can continue to grow.
If you're divorced, you probably won't be able to compare estimates with your ex. But if the marriage lasted at least 10 years, you should be able to qualify for spousal benefits based on your ex's record if you aren't remarried by the time you reach retirement age. Your ex needn't have started benefits for you to get a spousal check, but he or she would need to be old enough to qualify for retirement benefits (at least 62). You can read more about divorced spouse's benefits here.
AARP has a free calculator that can help you determine the best time to file for benefits. If you want to fiddle with the numbers and assumptions a bit more, for $40 you can try the Maximize My Social Security calculator, created by economics professor and author Laurence J. Kotlikoff.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Just bring manufacturing jobs back to USA......Just stop CONGRESS from looting Trust Funds (SS, CSRS, FSRS..etc), and stop the waste, fraud, and abuse...and SS will be fine!!!.
..all this otherr talk is NONSENSE!!
STOP your CONGRESSMEN from borrowing money from your SOCIAL SECURITY that they will never pay back.
VOTE the existing CONGRESS .......OUT OF OFFICE......THIS NOVEMBER ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Why in the hell did the republicans & democrats & the Obama administration reduce the SS payroll deduction fron 6.2% to 4.2% ?
At a time when they (all of them) will tell you there are problems with social security.
does that make any sense?
We work and pay into social security all our lives. Now the goverment says we may not get what we thought upon retirement. Why? They have given OUR money away. It's time we put our foot down.
The goverment gives billions of OUR dollars away every year in so called foreign aid. OUR MONEY!!! Who gets it? What do they do with it? What do they do for it? It's OUR MONEY and we need it. The time has come for us to take care of US.
The system is corrupt. As Americans, we are forced to pay into the system from the first legit paycheck you receive. The annual statement is a lie because you will not get back the money you put into it. If you make a somewhat decent salary, you are penalized by having you benefits reduced. Too bad if you retire but your spouse is still working. The amount you will receive will be affected by that person's salary. Tell you what, just give me back the money I put into the system. I can work out my own retirement. The only persons who should receive SS benefits are those who put into the system, the elderly who cannot support themselves, and the handicapped who would never be able to support themselves. There are way too many young people receiving SS benefits. The jobs are out there, you just have to lower your "standards" and take them. I took a major pay cut when I had to take another job, but at least I am working. I am so tired of carrying the weight of the lazy.
NO and we cannot wait for a member of our elected officials to offer this, because they NEVER will...and WHY would they, they will be having a great retirement with MY MONEY with everything the way it is.
While were at it lets tax each elected official increasingly greater each time they are re-elected, starting at 5% and increasing 10% for each additional term. Lets call it a 'incumbent tax', now that would be one for the little lowlife taxpayer to enjoy seeing.
If our do nothing congress really wanted to do something about social security, they would make the government put back all of the
money stolen from the social security fund and make it untouchable in the future except for social security paymnents. Then the congress should put the members of congress on the same standards they put the citizens on.
It's amazing to me how these two Misfits ( Obama & Romney ) can raise 100's of MILLIONS of dollars EACH, and US poor saps will not get 100% of OUR money back in SS benefits !!!
Time for a Civil War in this country. That, my friends, is REAL CHANGE.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
RECENT ARTICLES ON RETIREMENT
Those shackled with student loan debt are increasingly being targeted by scams and shady companies promising relief.