How couples can get the most from Social Security
Knowing how and when to claim can make a huge difference in lifetime payouts. Therefore, mistakes come at a painfully high price.
When deciding how you and your spouse should approach Social Security retirement benefits, there are a lot of approaches to consider. Unfortunately, many of them can result in you getting significantly less than what's available to you.
"It's like a game of chess," says Mari Adam, a certified financial planner based in Boca Raton, Fla.
Each decision you make as a couple can impact the monthly Social Security benefits you receive for the rest of your lives. Consequently, even small missteps can shave thousands from the cumulative benefits you receive as a couple.
To prevent you and your partner from getting short-changed, consider these five tips for helping married couples maximize their Social Security benefits.
Whether you're single or married, deciding when to start your benefits is critical. But when a couple makes a bad timing decision together, the losses are compounded. This makes it especially important for couples to grasp the basics.
"If you start early, you get less on a monthly basis. If you wait longer, you get more on a monthly basis," says Kurt Czarnowski, who worked for Social Security Administration for 34 years and is now principal at Czarnowski Consulting, a retirement planning company.
You can choose to start collecting Social Security benefits early (starting at age 62), but your benefits will be permanently reduced from what you would have received if you waited until your full retirement age (age 66 for people born from 1943 to 1954). Claiming benefits at 62 means your monthly benefit is likely to be about 25% less than what you would have received at your full retirement age, Czarnowski says.
Conversely, if you wait past your full retirement age to collect your benefits, your future monthly payout will increase by up to 8% each year until you turn 70.
Simply waiting until full retirement age to claim benefits can have a significant impact on a couple's finances over the course of their lives, says Josh Koehnen, a certified financial planner in San Diego.
"Assuming health is good, married couples should hold off until at least full retirement age (66 or 67) before taking any benefits," Koehnen says. "Taking it before this time will result in a permanent reduction that could mean missing out on significant dollars, depending on how long they live. I recently ran an analysis for a client, which showed that if they both waited until full retirement age and ultimately lived until age 85, they would receive over $150,000 in additional benefits."
For healthy couples who would like to maximize their lifetime payout, Koehnen recommends delaying the collection of benefits -- with the exception of Social Security spouse's benefits, as you'll read below -- until age 70 if possible.
3. Delay Social Security benefits for the higher earner
If one spouse was the major breadwinner for the couple, that spouse may want to delay receiving monthly retirement benefits from Social Security longer than their partner. Doing so can help guarantee that the surviving spouse will collect as large a benefit as possible when the other dies.
"The spouse with the higher monthly benefit should postpone collecting Social Security as long as possible, but not beyond the age of 70," says Michelle Tucker, a certified financial planner at Tucker Wealth Management in Honolulu. "The object of postponing is to maximize your benefit and this higher benefit will be paid to you for life and continue for the life of your surviving spouse."4. Consider a file-and-suspend approach . . .
Using a file-and-suspend strategy is one way couples can reap an oft-overlooked perk: Social Security spouse's benefits.
For example, if both spouses are eligible for benefits and one opts to file and suspend while the other doesn’t file at all, it allows the nonfiling spouse to claim a spouse's benefit as both of them continue to let their regular benefits grow. If the couple intended to delay collecting anyway, this monthly spouse's benefit effectively equals free money.
"A client recently used this strategy where the husband decided to file and suspend his benefit at age 66 so that the wife could take a spousal benefit until they both begin taking their own benefits at age 70," Koehnen says. "She is now getting about $1,100 per month for the next four years, which will result in over $55,000 of additional funds."
5. . . . or a file-and-restrict strategy
A strategy similar to file-and-suspend is called file-and-restrict. This approach also bring spouse's benefits into the mix, but unlike file-and-suspend, one of the spouses must be collecting his or her regular benefits in this scenario.
"If you are 66 and your spouse is collecting Social Security based on her earnings history, you can file and restrict your application and qualify for your spousal benefit based on her earnings history," Tucker says. "By doing this, you will collect a spousal benefit while you postpone collecting your own benefit, which continues to grow."
Then, when your regular benefit has grown to a level that satisfies you, you can withdraw your restriction and begin collecting that amplified benefit for the rest of your life.
More from MoneyRates.com:
- 6 tough questions to ask before retiring
- 7-point checklist to prepare for Social Security
- 5 money errors retirees make
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
I am retiring in Jan at age 64 and for one am not going to wait to get my money....wife is doing the ame thing...we are done and going to start taking it. No waiting....may not be there when we need it.
Sorry - for those coming behind us....but I have been paying in since 1966 and plan on getting mine before it is all gone.+
After much calculating I began collecting my SS at 62 with the idea of having the full amount I receive each month transferred from my bank to several direct investment stock accounts.
I chose stocks with a long record of paying better than average dividends along with capital appreciation, and chose to have our dividends re-invested.
To date the amount we receive in dividends surpasses the difference we would have received if we waited to collect SS at full retirement with the added benefit of having a lump sum available if needed.
I realize this option is not available to everyone but it definitely can be a beneficial alternative to waiting until full retirement age.
Does the expert figure the dollars used in the difference between benefits at age 66 vs age 62?
Each year adds a devaluation of that dollar. What about the case of two wage earners who earned about the same during their lifetimes? In our case the break even point was 79. My life expectancy
is about 86. Seven more years and the quality of life is different towards the end of that time. I won't be doing as much between 79 and 86 like I am between 62 and 66! Even so, has anyone ever figured out what the actual payback should be based on 45 years of paying in? What about the poor slob who dies before cashing in on SSAN or at the beginning of the payout and he worked all his/her life and has no dependents? What happens to all that money?
This article gives examples for "healthy old people"!!!
How many healthy old people do you know? Very few, so this article applies to them only!
I got laid off at 61, I took unemployment for two years while I did my best to re-qualify and get a job, but then I had no choice but take SS at about 63. MY wife does not qualify for SS and she will have to wait 4 more years to collect half of my SS. I lost a lot by taking it early and my wife would take less for that.
Then I got cancer... I have friends with stroke and some other "unexpected" medical problem. So, this article suggests...
Oh, my 401k disappeared in the market crash! bad timing and got screw allover
Assuming $1500 at 65
|Age||Start 65||Start 62||Difference|
|65||$ 18,000.00||$ 57,327.00||$ 39,327.00|
|76||$ 270,464.00||$ 270,318.00||$ (146.00)|
|80||$ 392,842.00||$ 373,562.00||$ (19,280.00)|
|85||$ 575,466.00||$ 527,615.00||$ (47,851.00)|
If you live up to 85, that $48K is some change, but it took 20 years to see the effect. Not very convincing.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
There are plenty of people who are willing to buy your silver and other valuables, but most won't give you top dollar for what you have.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'