9/14/2012 7:43 PM ET|
How high will the retirement age go?
Forget stepping off the employment treadmill at age 65. Lifestyle and financial factors are pushing retirement further into the future.
In June, Robert Benmosche, the chairman of the insurance giant American International Group, said an increase in the retirement age was unavoidable. What surprised many is how high he predicted the age would go.
"Retirement ages will have to move to 70, 80 years old," Benmosche told Bloomberg. "That would make pensions, medical services more affordable. They will keep people working longer and will take that burden off of the youth."
Currently, Americans are eligible for early retirement at 62, and full retirement at 66. The loss of retirement funds during the economic downturn forced many to acknowledge that they would have to work longer. But Benmosche's statement shocked many. Will people really have to work a decade or more longer than they expected to make ends meet in retirement?
The answer is yes, according to some retirement experts. A number of factors, accelerated by the Great Recession, are now forcing people to change the ways they save for and think about retirement.
"Most people didn't have enough retirement savings before the downturn. The downturn was the two-by-four hit over the head that made them realize this result," says Steve Vernon, the president of Rest-of-Life Communications, a company that helps people adjust the way they save for their post-work years.
Never completely retired?
The U.S. government has already acknowledged that the official retirement age will need to increase further than the already-revised 67 years. But doubts about the long-term solvency of Social Security linger. And the need for retirees to find funding beyond the government entitlement is making the official age obsolete anyway.
"The idea of retirement is morphing into a period of time where you work for an extended period, perhaps not making as much money or as many hours, but you still bring in money and keep going," Vernon says.
He says there are two primary reasons for the change:
- Workers don't have enough saved to meet their needs after they stop working, so they need the additional income.
- People are living longer and want to be more engaged with life.
Todd Tresidder, a financial coach and founder of FinancialMentor, calls this shifting reality the "new retirement," which calls for people to continue producing income while allowing a retirement nest egg to grow.
"We added a whole new step in life. We're going from a two-step model -- save while working and then live off the savings -- to a three-step model," Tresidder says. In the new model, "You work like a dog, save a nest egg . . . you reach some point of 'enough-ness' when you're comfortable with the amount you have saved. Then you launch an encore career. You orient it to a satisfying life. You make enough to allow your income to compound. You run this lifestyle for fulfillment. You shorten the time that you use your nest egg."
How high can it go?
But the question remains: How long will someone have to continue working to achieve a secure retirement? Unfortunately, it's impossible to answer conclusively, because it depends on individual circumstances and needs.
According to Vernon, this change will happen to all workers, not just those in lower-income brackets. Even people with healthy retirement savings likely don't have enough to maintain their lifestyle. This shift is also occurring in other industrialized nations.
"Workers in industrialized nations that have transitioned away from traditional pension plans will be forced to work longer. Examples include the U.K. and Australia," says Vernon. "Other countries with higher Social Security benefits are taking longer to transition, such as France, Spain, Italy, Greece and Sweden."
- Calculator: How much will your 401k provide?
Polls indicate that Americans are beginning to accept that these changes are coming. According to a recent Gallup survey, most Americans now believe they will have to retire at 67, up from 66 last year, 63 10 years ago, and 60 in the 1990s.
But the poll also shows that people expect the increase in the retirement age to be small. According to Vernon and Tresidder, this isn't the case: People are going to be forced to work into their 70s very soon.
Tresidder says this change does not have to be a bad thing. People can work in fields that engage them and provide personal satisfaction. Just because a person's first career was a grind doesn't mean the second one will be the same.
"People are really embracing (working later in life) because it's really about fulfillment," he says.
More from U.S. News & World Report:
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
It's not right that all of the baby boomers and their parents before them got to retire at a decent age and those of us in our 30's and 40's will be forced to wait longer to enjoy our retirement years. By the time we are able to retire, we will be too old to enjoy it. But hey... the baby boomers got what they wanted (cause they are grandfathered in) and have screwed everything up for the rest of us. It's absolutely disgusting! I have paid into social securty too and should have the same rights that they got!
This makes me sick. Social Security should be what it was created for; to help people who need it…period. I know multiple people worth millions collecting monthly SS checks. I don’t care how much you have put into it; if you don’t need it, you don’t collect it. Our tax system is not everyone’s piggy bank. Once your net worth eventually drops below half a million, then and only then you start collecting. That would certainly help SS be there longer for the people that really need it. But the rich would rather see SS die before giving this up.
I'm 52, had two heart attacks since age 34, (no not obese or bad diet-bad luck with genes), and assume that I'll never get to retire. I'll continue working 'till the big 'un and that's it...
I'm screwed, but don't wish that on anyone. People pay into a national retirement plan and should be able to benefit from it. Our problems with social security lies in mismanagement of the plan from elected officials who also receive benefits from it and shouldn't. We should trade 'em our plan for theirs.
Time to kick some ****
SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE IS NOT A ENTITLEMENT ! SOCIAL SECURITY ARE EARNED INCOME & BENEFITS !
WE DID OUR SHARE WE PAID OUR DUES.
Each & Every damn Pay Day for a LifeTime of BustAss Labor, Social Security & MediCare were deducted from Our Pay Checks. A LifeTime of Personal Earnings are collected before You recieve One Dime of Income & Benefits at age 65.
When You say the word ENTITLEMENT that to me means Free. Social Security is NOT Free, It is EARNED. Period End of Story
SPW in Alaska "Airborne"
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'