6/28/2011 5:34 PM ET|
How to retire on Social Security alone
Well, sure it's easier to stop working if you have a pension and a fat 401k, but millions of us don't. Here are 6 ways to stretch those checks.
Dan Curtis expects Social Security to be his largest source of retirement income. The 52-year-old patient advocate for a health insurance company has a few thousand dollars in a 401k, but he finds it difficult to save on a salary of $38,000 a year, before taxes, in Minneapolis. He is also paying off $20,000 in student loan debt and providing child support payments for his two children.
"My retirement future feels pretty uncertain," he says. "If I could make another $10,000 or $12,000 a year, I could probably put some money away."
While it's generally a good idea to supplement your Social Security income with a traditional pension or personal savings, millions of people count on Social Security as their primary source of retirement income. Just over a third (34%) of retirees age 65 and older got 90% or more of their retirement income from Social Security in 2008. And the majority of retirees age 65 and older (64%) get at least half of their retirement income in the form of a Social Security payment.
Getting by on Social Security alone or with a small amount of savings will generally require some cost-cutting. The average monthly Social Security check was $1,178.80 in March 2011. A dual-earner couple, each receiving the average benefit, would receive $28,291.20 annually, which would be adjusted each year for inflation. Here's a look at how you can retire when Social Security is your primary source of retirement income. (Use this MSN Money calculator to see if you're saving enough for retirement.)
1. Maximize your benefit. If Social Security is going to be your biggest source of retirement income, you want to boost your benefit as much as you can. Your highest 35 earnings years are factored into your Social Security payout. Getting raises, working a second part-time job or even delaying retirement could boost your benefits because higher-earning years later in your career will cancel out years in your teens or 20s when you didn't earn as much. Your payout also varies based on the date you sign up for benefits.
"If you can wait until your full retirement age rather than taking it at age 62, oftentimes, depending on your health and longevity, that is going to be much more advantageous," says Kathryn Nusbaum, a certified financial planner for Middle America Planning in Pittsburgh. Your payment will increase for each year you delay claiming between ages 62 and 70.
2. Test out a smaller budget. Get an estimate of how much your Social Security payments would be at the age you plan to retire, and practice living on that amount before you actually leave your job.
"The people who seem to weather it the best are those individuals who go into it intentionally understanding that they have to live within their means," says Nusbaum. "You will not be getting a new car or going on fancy trips, but maybe a trip to the Olive Garden with a coupon." To live on this new and likely smaller budget, you will need to eliminate as many expenses as possible, including your mortgage, car loans and credit card or other debt.
Some people also start gardens to reduce food costs, cancel unnecessary or duplicative TV and phone services, and begin to find low-cost or free entertainment. "Discretionary spending, like entertainment expenses, is going to need to be whittled as much as possible, so it's free concerts and the public library," says Jill Gianola, a certified financial planner and owner of Gianola Financial Planning in Springfield, Ohio. (How much will your 401k provide? Check MSN Money's calculator.)
3. Minimize your housing expenses. Paying off your mortgage eliminates one of your biggest expenses and will allow your limited budget to stretch further in retirement. You can also control your housing costs by downsizing to a smaller home or a less-expensive neighborhood and pocketing the price difference. In some cases, you can also lower your property taxes or maintenance expenses by moving to a smaller abode.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Come on, advice to retirees needs to account for the fact that most people are so hammered by now that they don't have two nickles to rub together.
Try getting a job when you are over 60. Go ahead, try.
Yeah, CHANGE. We got it. But not the kind we thought.
Re: Living on social security income when retired.
Stay away from reverse mortgages. You will find they are crooked and only benefit the lenders who lie to you with false information.
You will get burnt.
I started planning for our retirement when I married at 32.
My wife never worked but stayed home and raised our two children.
I started a small business and worked my **** off for 20 years. I borrowed to invest in real estate. I worked my **** off even more taking care of the real estate investments as well as my small business.
I paid my bills. We lived in an adequate home and drove an adequate auto. By the time we had been married 15 years we felt we could build and pay for a nicer home and we did. Five years later when my children graduated from High School, I sold my business and my real estate and retired.
I invested the proceeds in the stock market and my wife and I lived on part of the income. The rest, we reinvested. When my children finished college, we sold our nicer home, bought a much smaller home, and invested the rest.
When I reached 62, I chose to draw SS at the reduced rate. My wife did not reach qualification age until 11 years later when she began to draw. As of this date, we still have not drawn out an amount equal to the amount contributed by me and my corporation plus interest earned even including my wife's withdrawals.
During that period of time, my wife and I traveled all over the world. We did not stay in $300 a night hotels and did not fly Business class. When we did travel on a cruise ship, we utilized the discounts and specials. We traveled to areas of the world we wanted to see, not the areas that were visited by the Celebrities. We really enjoyed our lives. We were proud of the accomplishments of our children. We lived as we chose to live. We had nothing to prove to anyone. We have lived this life for nearly 30 years and we did it through our own efforts. The SS was helpful but not necessary and if to keep out great nation from having to default on it debt, I would give up that income in a second.
I realize that not all citizens are fortunate enough to have sufficient income to give up SS. I also think that there are many who could manage their income better. In stead of a new Lexus or BMW, could buy a lesser auto and instead of a 5,000 sq ft home, could live in a 2,000 sq ft home. Instead of paying $36,000 additional in principal and interest on a home and auto, they could pay more taxes or give up part of their SS. to help the country. Government employees could give up a part of the huge retirement benefits, so could union members. Certainly business could give up many of the tax breaks and subsidies.
Even the so called "Poor" could agree that they are not entitled to live better that some working people who not only have less income than them, but pay taxes on what they receive, unlike the "Poor" who get back income taxes which they have never paid.
It's time for the whole country to step forward. It's time for everybody who is a citizen of this country to realize how fortunate they are to have been able to live in a country that offers its citizens such wonderful opportunities. It's time to stop being so selfish and so self involved.
Like the poster of Uncle Sam said in 1940, "I need you". It's time for loyal citizens to answer that call!!!
The SS fiasco began under Carter, he is the one that signed the law for any age eligible immigrant to be able to draw SS. There is a little town on the US/ Mexico border that specializes in post office boxes! The town has a population of 5,000, but they have over 20,000 p.o. boxes. 20/20 did a story about the happenings in this town and talked to some of the p.o. box owners. The majority of the customers were from Mexico and once a month they would come to town and get their SS checks! That"s just one of the things that is wrong with SS, and it needs to be fixed! If the health care bill that Obama is pushing gets appoved we will have the same thing there, Nancy Polosi has already said that the health care bill would take care of all immigrants, whether they were legal or illegall. That is something Americans can't afford!
Each and every one of you that has paid into SS, has paid TWICE as much as you think.
The matching amount put in by your employer, was really put in by you, it just never showed up on your paycheck.
Your not getting back even close to what you paid.
This article claims that, "[social security] benefits would be adjusted each year for inflation".
That is clearly a misstatement, as current beneficiaries received no benefit increase for inflation in 2010 or 2011. The truth is, nobody knows what social security will become in the future.
Regarding home-equity loans as a tool to increase revenue, the first word that comes to mind is "foreclosure". Be very careful.
For me, the following statement is the most-important statement in the article.
"The people who seem to weather [retirement] the best are those individuals who go into it intentionally understanding that they have to live within their means."
Our 4 biggest banks have 8 trillion in assets and have been getting billions in 0% loans to play the market and make foreign investments. Wonder why they can't get by with less?
We routinely pay banks 600k for a 200k house even when the government guarantees the loan. If those loans were made directly for a low interest, notes would be cut in half or more and trillions would be with our people instead of thieving banks. Why do we run our country for banks and wall street instead of our people?
We need to completely redo our financial system. That means we first need a government.
Fortunately, in reality I retired early at 56 in 2006 on a small pension with health insurance and lived on a very tight budget for four years until it was clear I wasn't going to go through my nest egg before I start collecting Social Security, which will probably be at age 64. My company-75%-subsidized health insurance will become my supplemental, prescription, dental, and vision insurance when I reach 65 and sign up for Medicare A & B.
A number of my friends are just getting by in retirement but could live very well if they were getting 33%-50% more from Social Security. The disappearance of corporate pensions in America should be replaced with an option to contribute and extra 6% more to Social Security to provide a "piggyback pension." 401k's generally have high fees that gouge half the gains out of them (compared to about 10% of the gains in regular mutual funds) and people don't know how to handle them: a piggyback pension would be a better option for most.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.