4/28/2014 3:15 PM ET|
Why you'll probably retire twice
Some people manage to retire before they hit 65, but there's a good chance you may retire early ... and late.
Retirement has been cut short for many workers with close to 48 percent being forced back to work due to financial reasons, according to a new study.
"The average American can avoid retiring twice by taking advantage of their 401ks, retirement plans so they can save enough to avoid needing a second employment," said Brenda Hendrickson, author of "How to Be a Frugal Millionaire" (iUniverse, 2008).
An ING Direct survey found that 33 percent of previous retirees re-entered the workforce, because they did not have enough money saved for retirement and 31 percent cited increased living costs. Of the half who were forced back to work for financial reasons, 31 percent returned on a full-time basis.
"You can't put your financial future on the back burner," said Peter Aceto, president and CEO with ING Direct. "Among the many other financial priorities we face during our prime working years, we need to make sure that retirement planning doesn't get overlooked."
Healthcare may have something to do with the need for some to retire twice in one lifetime.
"People often have to go back to work or find a second career because they need medical insurance," Hendrickson told MainStreet. "They might not be old enough yet to collect Medicare."
If given the opportunity to re-visit their 20s and 30s, 29 percent of retirees who re-entered the workforce said they would have found a way to save more for retirement, 24 percent said they would have started saving earlier and 11 percent said they wouldn't have spent money so mindlessly.
"If you start saving in your 20s, putting away 8 to 10 percent of your income will probably be sufficient," said Stephen Gierl, certified financial planner and principal with Gierl Augustine Investment Management. "If you wait until your late 30s you will need to save at twice that rate, which is not easy to do."
"Unfortunately, we live in a carpe diem and instant gratification society, which does not mesh well with the roots of the retirement dilemma," Gierl told MainStreet. "The big change in the retirement picture has been the decline of pension plans. As older companies replaced pensions with 401ks and newer companies offered 401ks from their inception, the burden of providing a lifetime of income fell on the shoulders of the workers. This is a serious problem for the many who want to live for the day."
For many, the reality of life after work isn't what they imagined. About 45 percent said the cost of living was higher than anticipated and 27 percent said it was more of a financial struggle than originally thought.
A bucket approach to investing can assist with an ever increasing cost of living in retirement.
"The income needed for the first three to five years is put in to very conservative fixed income investments while assets needed for income in years five to ten can include some growth investments such as stocks," Gierl said. "Assets needed for income years 10 to 15 can include even more growth and so on. This process insulates the retiree from taking withdrawals from a declining pool of money and still provides a mechanism to keep up with inflation."
The survey found that 40 percent would have maxed out their annual contribution if they had a better understanding of how much was needed to retire, while 16 percent felt they would have benefited from a good financial role model. Interestingly, 20 percent confessed that nothing would have motivated them.
For those having to work through their golden years due to financial reasons, 58 percent believe that they'll be able to retire in five years but 24 percent are still only hopeful.
"If they have saved enough from the first retirement, then they can take on a second job on a part-time basis for the second retirement," Hendrickson said. "The key is living within your means during the first retirement so there will be enough money."
More from MainStreet
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
I hear a song coming on ............'God Bless America'.......(sarcasm).......why is the United States not in the top ten for 'comfortable retirement' when compared to the 'other' industrialized nations? Why?
Wait, Obamacare is such a great deal and it's dirt cheap, 7 million of signed up and 5 million will never pay the next installment after they file their taxes. I grow tired of these daily columns on why we should wait until 70 years to take SS and now they are telling me I will have to retire 2 times.
One major problem is that returning to the workforce out of necessity will never produce the same flexibility and income as continuing to work voluntarily. Greeters at Walmart or baggers at the supermarket? Not a good second career choice.
I was fortunate enough to "retire" at 62 by re-defining my job, with flexible hours, little stress, and a continuing income stream that allows me to live comfortably until I decide to hang it up. Am I lucky? You bet. Can you do it? Plan ahead, and stay healthy.
Of course we have to save for retirement, what is the news here? But considering the advise is coming from investment bankers, whom want our money so they can cash in millions in bonuses, I do not think a lot of people will change what they are doing now for their retirement.
And in fact, how can you blame people from wanting to have a nice life when they are still young and able to enjoy it? People want to travel and have fun on their own two feet, and not to spent the money on wheelchairs and medication for arthritis at the age of 80+!!! How about a comprehensive pension system like in the other civilized countries? Maybe then we could have a nice life and a decent retirement too?
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Occupy Wall Street bought and forgave the student loan debt of more than 2,700 Everest College students.