New minimum wage would cut food stamps by $4.6 billion
A new study finds that raising the minimum wage would reduce food stamp expenditures by 6 percent.
This post comes from Krystal Steinmetz of partner site Money Talks News.
Don't like food stamps? Raise the minimum wage. That's the finding of a new study (.pdf file) by the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning Washington, D.C., think tank.
The report says a hike in the minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 per hour, as proposed by the Obama administration, would cut the federal food stamp bill by $4.6 billion a year and reduce enrollment in the program by up to 9.2 percent.
The report is one of the first to study how increasing the federal minimum wage would impact the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, commonly known as food stamps. SNAP reaches about 1 in 7 Americans and had a hefty $78 billion price tag in 2011.
University of California economist Michael Reich co-authored the Center for American Progress report. According to The Washington Post:
"What is the best way to make people independent and be able to sustain their standard of living without having to depend on government support?," Reich asked. "It turns out that raising the minimum wage helps make people more independent while saving the government money."
It's been estimated by other studies that taxpayers spend about $7 billion a year to subsidize low-wage fast-food workers and $900 million a year helping bank tellers. SNAP represents a chunk of those funds.
Opponents of an increased minimum wage argue that it would eliminate some jobs and slow job growth.
What do you think of the reported link between hiking the minimum wage and decreased dependency on government programs, like food stamps?
More on Money Talks News:
So...the government "saves" 4.6 billion...to be spent elsewhere.
In the mean time, businesses will just pass on the increases to the consumer.
Meaning, more burden on the already diminishing middle-class.
This supposed savings is based on the assumption that the Poverty Threshold, used to determine eligibility for SNAP is unchanged by the rise in minimum wage. However this is unlikely, because the cost of labor goes up (and not just for unskilled labor because many workers with skills, currently making $10/hour will no longer work for the same price as an unskilled laborer...and many unions tie increases to the minimum wage). The rising cost of labor will be inflationary. The Poverty Threshold will rise, and the number of people on SNAP will be relatively unchanged.
If such a thing did not happen, then the increased income would result in an effective marginal tax rate of about 90% on the increase because of lost SNAP, EITC, housing subsidies etc. for full time workers. So, then you'd have increased inflation to be countered by an effective 10% increase in income. The inflation might not come if there were sufficient offsets in labor costs in other areas (i.e. increased unemployment). Increased unemployment in the "learning labor force" (those workers who will use unskilled labor positions to prepare for higher paying jobs) will have cascading future effects which will put even more downward pressure on the economy.
Businesses should determine how much they spend for labor, not the government. All this artificial increase will do is to raise the cost of American labor...probably increasing the number of "jobs Americans" won't do (or more aptly - can't be paid appropriately to do) and encourage more illegal immigration as well as dependency on the government.
Food Stamps are one of the most abused and wasteful social program this country has ever developed. A family of four receives more money monthly then my family of five spends a month on food. The amount paid out each month should be cut by at least one third. Purchases by food stamps should be (if not already) restricted to the following: Fresh/frozen non prepared meats & fish, fresh/frozen non prepared vegetables, deli meats/cheeses, canned goods, breads, non sweetened dairy, and non sweetened juices. The following should always be banned, and processes need to be in place where not already, to restrict: Soda, bottled water, power and energy drinks, sweetened juices, coffee, tea, ice cream, candy, energy bars, any pre-prepared meals or sandwiches, snacks/junk food, or any food that is mail ordered or shipped anywhere. If these rules would be followed, and recipients would learn how to shop and properly eat, no one would be hungry and we the taxpayers would save billions.
Tobacco and alcohol should be banned from purchase by welfare funds. No cash should be allowed to be pulled off of any assistance cards except at banks and should be limited to a very low percentage of funds.
People get all worked up over welfare but I don`t see the anger over CEO`S making $200,000,000
a year and another $200,000,000 golden parachute when they get fired.Let`s not forget their perks.
The amount of welfare is peanuts compared to CEO`S who don`t get their hands dirty.
"What is the best way to make people independent and be able to sustain their standard of living without having to depend on government support?," Reich asked.
This guy seems to think that the minimum wage isn't a government support.
It's mind boggling that an economist could think that.
The minimum wage is a government floor on wages!
In other word :
sting the corporations (who are the backbone on world economics) and reduce their profits for a lazy class of overweight, underskilled welfarians too strung out to work!!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
State Farm says cost of deer-strike repairs up 14 percent, and drivers' odds of hitting one have increased as well.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'