Predictions of Obamacare 'death spiral' overblown
Conventional wisdom has held that getting young people to sign up is the key. But a new study says that's not the case after all.
This post comes from Yuval Rosenberg at partner site The Fiscal Times.
Now a policy brief released Tuesday by the Kaiser Family Foundation suggests that those “young invincibles” are not quite as important as the conventional wisdom holds – and that, even if they enroll at relatively low levels, it’s highly unlikely that they will set off an Obamacare “death spiral.” The Kaiser analysis finds that, even in a likely worst-case scenario, premiums would only go up 1 to 2 percent in 2015, nowhere near the kind of spike that could send the reform law snowballing toward failure.
The oft-repeated actuarial analysis behind that “death spiral” prediction goes like this: Obamacare imposes limits on how much more insurers can charge older policyholders relative to younger ones. That means the young enrollees will be subsidizing coverage for older ones. If young, healthy people don’t sign up in sizable enough numbers, insurers would be left with a pool of customers that is disproportionately older and sicker (read: more expensive).
The insurance companies would adjust by hiking premiums the next year, making their plans even less appealing to the healthier young group and increasing the likelihood that only those who most need coverage would sign up. As the cycle continued, it could destroy the individual insurance market and doom Obamacare.
The reality isn’t quite that simple, Kaiser Family Foundation analysts Larry Levitt, Gary Claxton and Anthony Damico explain. Yes, they write, the age distribution across the entire market matters and the goal is to have young adults enroll in about the same proportion as they represent of the overall market of potential insurance buyers.
Adults age 18 to 34 make up 40 percent of the market, so, ideally, they’d account for 40 percent of new enrollments -- that’s how the Obama administration got to its stated target of 2.7 million young enrollees, based on CBO projections that 7 million people would sign up for 2014.
The Kaiser analysis modeled out two scenarios in which young adults opt not to enroll to varying degrees. If adults under age 35 sign up for Obamacare at a 25 percent lower rate than the rest of the population, they would represent 33 percent of the individual market enrollees, not the 40 percent of the potential market they represent. The result, Kaiser reports, would be that insurers’ costs are about 1.1 percent higher than premium revenues.
In the second scenario, young adults sign up at half the rate of the rest of the population, so that they represent just 25 percent of enrollees. That rate roughly matches the enrollment rates through November for young adults in California’s health care exchange, which reported that 21 percent of enrollees over the first two months of open enrollment were in the 18 to 34 age range.
The Kaiser analysts note that “this is likely a worst-case scenario, since the expectation is that older and sicker individuals are more likely to buy first and that younger and healthier people will tend to wait until towards the end of the open enrollment period.” Even so, they found that costs in this case would only be about 2.4 percent higher than revenues from premiums.
Insurers typically set their rates to deliver a profit margin of 3 percent to 4 percent, the Kaiser trio wrote, meaning that even under this worst-case scenario, they’d still make a slim profit. Even if they raised rates by 1 percent to 2 percent in 2015 to boost their margins, that increase “would be well below the level that would trigger a ‘death spiral,’” the authors wrote.
The Obamacare law also includes some other components that could ward off a death spiral, including government subsidies that rise along with premiums and thus dampen any price hike to consumers and so-called “risk corridors” that would have the government compensate insurers if costs exceed projected targets by more than 3 percent.
The bottom line, according to the Kaiser report, is that signing up young adults may be less important than it has been portrayed to be, and the real key will be to get relatively healthy people to buy plans: “It is important to attract the ‘young invincibles,’ but maybe with a greater focus on the ‘invincible’ part."
More from The Fiscal Times:
- Millennials: Obamacare for thee, but not for me
- The most depressing health care chart you'll see all day
- 8 things that will get cheaper in 2014
HAHA it only took 13 minutes!
13 minutes is ALL IT TOOK for MSN to delete my comment yet again!!! So typical of them to delete anything that has a 4:1 thumbs up to thumbs down ratio when the comment is anti-Obama.
Getting desperate MSN? No agenda pushing here is there? Socialist pigs.
Sounds to me like the sheep herders are getting desperate.
Look for the health "care" law to very soon be absolutely mandatory for everyone (minus politicians, of course) regardless of whether or not one can afford his/her own health care. Everyone will have to pay for it, regardless...
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
Banks often use sign-up bonuses as a way to get new customers to apply for one of their cards. But are you guaranteed to earn the bonus?
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'