The economics of eating
Smaller portions will reduce your food bill (and your waist).
This post comes from Abby Freedman, a freelance writer and daughter of Smart Spending blogger Donna Freedman.
An MSN article
about portion sizes got me thinking about the economics of eating. Food
is, arguably, one of the most expensive aspects of modern life, whether
you make your meals at home or eat out.
We order our days
around meal breaks. We deny ourselves some foods and force others down
our throats -- when was the last time someone willingly ate a rice
cake? Finally, we pay tons of money to gyms so that we can work off all
I don't have diet foods or delivered meals worked into my spending plan. But I do have to fit into a wedding gown in 5 1/2 months. So I decided to try a little experiment with portion size, and see if I couldn't make food a bit more affordable at the same time.
Breakfast of (frugal) champions?
The box of Kashi GoLean
cereal claims to hold eight servings of one cup each. But somehow I got
just over three breakfasts per box, even though I ate only one bowl
Measuring-cup time! Once I started measuring my
servings, the box magically held the advertised amount. Turns out I had
been eating anywhere from two to 2 1/2 cups at a time -- an entire extra
These days, my serving size is a cup and a half. Even
so, measuring the portions gets me two extra breakfasts per box, which
means I will buy 22 fewer boxes a year. This will trim up to $100 from
Speaking of trim, I'm now eating 190 fewer calories
per day -- 38 percent of the daily amount you need to cut in order to
lose a pound a week.
bread is expensive at $3 to $4 per loaf. One day I realized that I care
a lot less about the bread than I do about what's between it.
solution: Cut one big slice in half but use the same amount of filling.
I get twice as many sandwiches with the same amount of substantive
stuff, be it meat and cheese or peanut butter and jelly.
have a sandwich even three times a week, this means nine fewer loaves
per year, a savings of $27 to $36. Four sandwiches per week? That's 12
fewer loaves, or $36 to $48. And let's not forget the savings of 80 to
100 calories per slice.
Don't want to cut out bread? Ease off
on the cheese. Most folks use hefty amounts, and cheese goes for $3.50
to $6 per pound. Instead, use a super-thin slice or even sprinkle
grated cheddar or Muenster and then microwave the sandwich. The cheese
spreads as it melts, so you can use less without sacrificing taste.
Super, slimmer suppers
The average American ate 200 pounds of animal protein in 2005, or about 0.54 pounds per day, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Like many folks of my generation, I pay a bit more for convenience:
frozen boneless, skinless chicken breasts for $11 to $12 for about
three pounds. The bag lists 10 servings, but most bags have only six
What gives? It turns out the serving size is 4 ounces,
not one breast ,
as I had assumed. An entire breast is about twice the recommended
serving, so cut it in half. Each piece should be about the size of a
deck of cards. You now have a second meal.
In the end, you'll
get twice as many meals. Assuming even $2 per pound of chicken, beef or
pork -- and that's unlikely these days -- you're seeing a savings of
$100 to $200 as portions stretch farther.
Bonus: If you eat just one serving of chicken instead of two, you're skipping about 200 calories.
These three simple changes add up to $200 to $300 in grocery savings each year -- about one-tenth of our average annual grocery costs, according to the USDA.
Meanwhile, I'm taking in 1,500 fewer calories. My grocery bill isn't the only thing slimming down.
Published Dec. 26, 2007
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'