Why doesn't the media vet advertisers?
If you trust the website, can you trust the ads you see on it?
This post comes from Stacy Johnson at partner site Money Talks News.
Today I'm going to once again address a concern I've talked about before — namely, the advertising you see on websites, television, newspapers and every form of mass communication that accepts it.
To get started, here are two recent reader comments. I've gotten many similar ones over the years.
You run articles warning us about rip-offs and then you post one on your website. … Explain why you allow this scam on your website. Thank you. -- David
This one is about a different company, but the theme is the same.
I just want you to know that a company you sponsor on your website for cost-saving purposes is not reputable. I have reported (them) to Discover Card fraud services, the New York State BBB and Utah BBB. I am also unsubscribing from your newsletter.
I thought you vetted your affiliations better than that. It's a shame since people rely on you to save money and not get scammed. I hope you do a better job vetting in the future. -- Joe
These emails are painful. I've spent decades building credibility as a journalist. Without it, I'm out of business. So when I read things like "Explain why you allow this scam on your website" and "I thought you vetted your affiliations better than that," it really makes me cringe.
Here’s the deal, guys: We can't vet the advertisers on our website because we rarely know who they are. To understand why, here's a quick lesson in how online advertising works.
How websites make money
Websites are inexpensive to build and maintain relative to brick-and-mortar businesses, but they're far from free. Depending on the traffic they get, the computers that keep them available 24/7 are costly. Then there's the people. Tech experts to maintain the site. Writers to write articles. Editors to review their work.
If the site sells a product, that's obviously where the money comes from. But for sites like this one, where the "product" is information, there are only three ways to pay the bills:
- Charge readers a subscription fee. This is how The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and a few other sites bring in some revenue, although it's not the only way they make money.
- Sell advertising. It's no surprise to anyone who's ever watched TV, read a newspaper or seen a website that advertising keeps the lights on at many media companies, both online and off.
- Sell leads. If you've done much Web surfing, you're aware that many websites -- including Money Talks News -- offer lists and searches for everything from coupons to credit cards. This is called lead generation. The sponsoring site gets paid for sending potential customers to a product or service.
Money Talks News, as well as the vast majority of companies in the business of online news, doesn't charge a subscription fee. Instead we use a combination of advertising and lead generation to keep the lights on.
How Google changed the game
You're probably aware that Google changed the world of search by making it easy to find what you're looking for online. But you may not know that they also changed the world of advertising.
Before Google came along, there was only one way to find advertisers: approach them directly. Not a problem for companies like The New York Times or CNN. Because of the size of their Web audiences, advertisers would come to them. But what about the thousands of smaller websites that don't generate that kind of traffic?
Enter Google. Google allows smaller publishers to include ad spaces on their websites, then Google finds the advertisers to fill them.
Obviously, Google's service, called AdSense, isn't free. After we place Google ad spaces on our site, Google sells ads, puts them on our site, collects the money, and keeps part of it for themselves.
Something interesting about ads
You'd assume the ads you see around this article right now are the same that anyone else would see viewing the same article from a different computer. Wrong. Google, as well as other ad networks, serves ads it thinks you want to see, based on your personal online behavior.
In other words, if you shopped for shoes just before you started reading this, you could be seeing a shoe ad next to this article. If you were just reading an article on another site about new cars, you could be seeing car ads.
Ad networks also try to show you ads that might relate to the story content. So if the article you're reading here is about free credit scores, odds are higher you'll see ads from companies offering credit scores.
If you trust the website, can you trust the ad?
Now we get to what the readers above were actually suggesting: If you're trustworthy, the ads on your website should be as well. Or, put another way, if readers can't trust the people advertising on this website, maybe they shouldn't trust us either.
I hope now you understand why our editorial content and advertisers aren't related. I approve most articles on this website and all are approved by our extremely experienced editor, Karen Datko. Between the two of us, we have more than 50 years of journalism experience. You can trust us.
But Google picks both the ads and advertisers you see, and we don't supervise them.
Theoretically, ads should be truthful. That's the law of the land. And Google says they do their best to weed out bad apples. But you should always treat ads as what they are: ads. Whether it's an ad on TV, online or on a bus bench, always do checks before making contact.
How to vet ads
I hesitated to write this post for a simple reason. If anything I say could be construed as a warning against clicking on our ads, that could put Money Talks News in peril, along with everyone who works here and their families.
So please, don't stop clicking on ads. In fact, the more you click the better off we'll all be. We'll be happier and you will too because we'll use the money we make to provide you with more awesome content. But before you respond to any ad, wherever you see it, do the following.
- Proceed with caution, especially in certain circumstances. If you see an ad promising you something that sounds too good to be true, be cautious. Expect a catch and read the fine print.
- See what others say. Before entering your credit card information, go to your favorite search engine and put in these words: "(company name) complaints." This will tell you if the offer you're about to respond to has made other consumers unhappy.
- If you see something, say something. As I explained, Google picks our advertisers. But that doesn't mean we're helpless. If you feel you've been misled by an ad on Money Talks News, send two emails -- one to us here and one to Google here. Because while we can't vet our advertisers, we can individually ban them, and we will if enough of you tell us a company isn't playing fair.
But before accusing me of "sponsoring" a crook, please remember: The news anchor you're watching on TV isn't responsible for the ads during the commercial breaks. The newspaper reporter didn't sell the ad sharing the page with their story. And if a bad apple advertises on this website, it's not because we invited them.
More from Money Talks News
What? Sure you did, anyone that owns the site is responsible for whatever is on that site.
For anyone to say you can trust us as stated in this Article, that's usually means just the opposite. Your work stands for itself so don't tell folks they can trust you. America has become so Dumbed Down that most folks will buy just about any BS thrown at them. That is truly sad. Google Search has shown just how manipulated information in the New Age has become. You are far more likely to find a lie first as opposed to the Truth. Most these days can't tell the difference.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
Redrawn lines between full- and part-timers at Sodexo decide who is eligible for coverage.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'