Red-light cameras tough to beat
Advertisements for license plate sprays and covers say they render those pesky red-light cameras ineffective. A new study shows they don't work.
But what if you could apply a cover or spray to your license plates to neutralize the devices? Some products are marketed to do that: The spray or cover supposedly reflects the camera's flash and overexposes the photo, rendering it useless.
Sorry, folks. A new study of some of those products by the Los Angeles Police Department -- experts on the "California stop" -- shows they don't work and, in some cases, actually improve the image quality. Post continues after video.
Results of the study were detailed by theNewspaper.com for various driving conditions:
Nighttime. "The countermeasures had no effect on plate legibility under dark conditions, with the exception of V-2 (license plate shield), which occasionally caused a slight increase in front-plate legibility in half of the images. ... All rear plate images were clearly legible, with no significant difference between the test plate images and the control plate image. A citation could have been issued in all cases," the study said.
Tests between 8 and 9 a.m. produced better results for westbound cars, from a red-light runner's point of view. According to theNewspaper.com:
Photoblocker and a generic equivalent decreased legibility in 10 and 20 percent of the cases compared to half of images rendered unreadable with the cover. Headed eastbound, away from the sun, the images were all high-quality regardless of the countermeasures used.
It's not the first time such products have been put to the test, with similar results. Sprays and shields were the focus of a "MythBusters" review on the Discovery Channel several years ago. Also, NewsChannel 8 in Des Moines, Iowa, and Clive police tested one spray and two shields. One of the shields did obstruct a view of the plate by the naked eye -- a violation in many states. Otherwise, the cameras had a clear shot.
Is red-light running a big problem? The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety says:
In 2008, 762 people were killed and an estimated 137,000 were injured in crashes that involved red light running. About half of the deaths in red light running crashes are pedestrians and occupants in other vehicles who are hit by the red light runners.
Motorists are more likely to be injured in urban crashes involving red light running than in other types of urban crashes. An Institute study of urban crashes found that running red lights and other traffic controls was the most common cause of all crashes (22 percent). Injuries occurred in 39 percent of crashes involving running a traffic control; this was the highest proportion of any crash type.
More from MSN Money:
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
Forty-six percent of Americans know someone who has a problem with hoarding, according to a new Insure.com survey.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'