401k and IRA changes coming in 2012
Workers will be able to sock more away for retirement while enjoying tax benefits.
This post comes from Emily Brandon at partner site U.S. News & World Report.
Workers will be eligible to contribute an extra $500 to their 401ks next year, the Internal Revenue Service announced. Employees with higher incomes will also be eligible to get a tax break for saving in a traditional IRA, contribute to a Roth IRA, and qualify for the saver's credit.
Here's a look at how 401k and IRA rules will change in 2012.
Higher 401k contributions. The contribution limit for 401k's, 403b's, and the federal government's Thrift Savings Plan will increase to $17,000 in 2012, up from $16,500 in 2011. However, catch-up contribution limits for those age 50 and over will remain $5,500. (How much will your 401k provide? Try MSN Money's calculator.)
Increased IRA income limits. IRA contribution limits will remain $5,000 in 2012, and $6,000 for those age 50 and older. And, like this year, only workers who earn below certain income levels get a tax break for contributing to a traditional IRA. But those income limits will relax slightly next year.
The tax deduction for traditional IRA contributions will be phased out for singles and heads of household with workplace retirement plans who have modified adjusted gross incomes between $58,000 and $68,000 in 2012 ($92,000 to $112,000 for couples), up $2,000 from 2011. For IRA owners without a retirement plan at work, the deduction is phased out if the couple's income is between $173,000 and $183,000, up $4,000 from last year. Post continues after video.
Roth income limits relaxed. The income limits for making contributions to a Roth IRA will be between $110,000 and $125,000 for singles and heads of household in 2012, up $3,000 from 2011. For married couples filing jointly the income limits will increase by $4,000 to a phase-out range of $173,000 to $183,000.
Expanded saver's credit. Workers with slightly higher incomes will be able to get a tax credit worth up to $1,000 ($2,000 for couples) for low-income workers who save for retirement. Single workers who contribute to a retirement account such as an IRA or 401k may be able to claim the saver's credit if they have a modified adjusted gross income of up to $28,750 in 2012, up $500 from last year. The income limits will increase by $1,000 to $57,500 for married couples filing jointly and by $750 to $43,125 for heads of household.
More on U.S. News & World Report and MSN Money:
CONSUMER PARTICIPATION RECOVERY ACT, 2011 (CPR)
- There are an estimated 76 million Baby Boomers over the age of 55 years
- It is estimated that approximately 41 million are over the age of 65
- It is, therefore the case that approximately 35 million are 55 to 65 years of age
- There is a need for Disaster Relief
- There is a need for additional/increased consumer spending
As the recently retired Executive Director of the Montana Association of Counties I have been disappointed in the response to the financial crisis that arose in 2008. The actions taken by the government, in my opinion, did little by way of establishing consumer confidence and as a retiree I personally felt the impact with the loss of value in my retirement account and no one bailed me or the other millions of Americans who saw the value of their accounts diminish. I have spoken with our congressional delegation and have received little by way of a response from them.
With consumer confidence at an all time low it is proposed to establish what I have come to think of as "The Consumer Participation Recovery Act, 2011. (CPR) Very simply, it would provide a tax holiday by allowing each taxpayer to withdraw $25,000 from their retirement account prior to October 31, 2012 without the penalty for early withdrawal for individual 55 years to 65 or federal tax liability. An additional consideration would allow any tax payer to withdraw an additional $50,000 prior to October 31, 2012 from their "tax sheltered retirement account" to buy residential real estate without regard to the early withdrawal tax penalty or federal tax liability,
I would appreciate a response with your considered evaluation of the "concept".
Clifford Gordon Morris, Ph.D.
1375 Beaverhead Road
Helena, Montana 59602
Most of the adjustments mentioned in this article sound like increases on the scale of inflation. No offense, but, big deal. It’s the least they can do.
How about this for some real change. How about forgiving all taxes on deferred income in IRA’s and qualified retirement savings plans for people who don’t withdraw until age 65 or 30 years, whichever comes first. Now that would be a real incentive to save. Kind of like forgiving taxes on repatriation of deferred offshore income and capital like many large corporations are now lobbying for.
What bothers me more than anything is the damn government constantly trying to use the tax code as a behavior modification tool. To wit....
Government wants more houses sold, modify peoples behavior to entice them to buy a house via a tax credit. (home buyers credit)
Government wants more cars sold, modify peoples behavior by giving them a tax credit on certain kinds of cars if they'll turn in their old ones. (cash for clunkers)
Government wants more people to save, then modify their behavior by enticing them to save in an IRA because of a tax deduction.
Government wants less people smoking, then tax that product more.
And it goes on and on and on. Not to mention all the incessant regulations.
I don't need the damn putrid F#)*@$ government nanny state trying to micro manage every aspect of my life.
What I need is for them to get the hell out of my life. AND STAY THE HELL OUT!!!
Taxes are meant for, and constitutionally authorized for, one thing and one thing only, and that is to fund government. Taxes are not authorized to be used as a behavior modification tool.
And it's way past time that it be stopped.
Yes...lets put more in there for the Banks and Wal Street to take like the last time...
Dear Mr. Morris,
Bravo. Your idea is one of the first that I believe would lend some relief to senior citizens, who are making nothing on their saving because of low interest rates. Where can I sign on?
And to dsopt.........I don't give a rat's a$$ what you do with yours, but I know I can handle my withdrawal in a way that benefits me financially. And those who want to go to Vegas, well that's none of your fricking business, is it.
FYI for Mr. Morris
Avg. IRA balances per Google search (MSN won't let me post the link - thinks it is spam)
If the average 55-64 yo takes out 25K from their IRA it will leave an average of about 45K - that will unlikely provide much of a paycheck in retirement at 2.5% interest (~$1125/yr.). Granted they will have other sources of income but I am more interested in improving my nest egg than stimulating the economy.
As far as the tax free money to buy real estate that is an interesting proposition, but I personally am not interested in being a landlord buying a second property, (I am 51 years old) and live in a house I like that will be paid for in 2 years, so personally I have no interest in buying more real estate, but at the same time am worried that anemic growth rates will hurt my long term income. A safer way to do this could potentially be to buy a REIT, but those took a nosedive along with the market in 2008 so nothing is without risk.
All in all an interesting plan but once the politicians get a hold of it look out, who knows where it would end up. Some people would probably go to Vegas and blow it.
Wealth is a constant; the wealth destruction said it really did not exist. It every one 401K just doubled; would the return or expected return on the investments double, not its value? Its expected return should be its true value.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.