Smart SpendingSmart Spending

More millionaires despite tough times

About 4.5% of American households have $1 million or more in 'investable assets.'

By doubleace Jun 1, 2011 1:08PM

This post comes from Lynn Mucken at MSN Money.

 

While many Americans are struggling to handle the mortgage, the $100 grocery basket and the $75 fill-up, these rocky times have been good for a lot of people.

 

According to the Boston Consulting Group, the number of millionaire households in the United States grew 9.9%, from 4.75 million to 5.2 million in 2010, about 4.5% of the nation's 115 million households.

 

Oh, one other little figure: Those are cash millionaires. The BCG figures don't include homes, luxury goods and ownership in one's own company, but "investable assets" only.  Post continues after video. 

So if you are desperately seeking the glow that comes from millionaire status, you can't scramble in by including your home, which, by the way, is probably worth only two-thirds of what it was five years ago. (The BCG report did not give the mean net worth of U.S. households, and it is difficult to estimate since most reports include the value of the home.)

 

The report also examined the worldwide growth in wealthy households. It said:

Millionaire households represented just 0.9 percent of all households but owned 39 percent of global wealth, up from 37 percent in 2009. The number of millionaire households increased by 12.2 percent in 2010 to about 12.5 million. The United States had by far the most millionaire households (5.2 million), followed by Japan, China, the United Kingdom, and Germany.

Of course, mere millionaires are paupers compared with what BCG defined as "ultra high net worth" households, including the 2,692 in the U.S. worth more than $100 million. That's a lot of loose cash, and only about 1 in every 5.6 million households have it. 

 

And how did these people move up the financial ladder at a time when much of America was sliding down? The stock market, according to BCG.

 

"The strong performance of the financial markets accounted for the lion's share of the growth," said Monish Kumar, a BCG partner and co-author of the report.

 

While Kumar said this "bodes well for the future," he did issue a warning. "But the positive signs should not be read a return to normal," he said. "A number of disruptive forces, including increased regulatory oversight and changes in client behavior, are rewriting the rules of the game -- both literally and figuratively."

 

Naturally, these numbers are seen in different ways by different people.  Here are three comments from readers of Life Inc., a personal-finance site:

  • "We don't need redistribution of wealth," wrote "John Lucas." "We just need to allow more folks in the upper income brackets to experience all aspects of what it means to be an American. This includes giving them the opportunity to pay their fair share of taxes. Trickle WHAT? Thanks Ronny."
  • Wrote "Julio Gesklin": "I immigrated legally from South America 30 years ago, coming here with $180 in my pocket, worked ... and today I have a business that 70 families depend on. I don't have to feel guilty if I now have a house and business worth more than a million dollars. … The moral of the story is that if you want something, go get it!"
  • Chimed in "David Workman": "Being a millionaire just isn't what it used to be, when adjusting for inflation. Being a millionaire today is no harder than having a net worth of $100K in the 1960s. Now, having a net worth of $10 million? That's the new millionaire."

Here are a couple reactions from readers of the The Wall Street Journal's The Wealth Report blog:

  • Wrote "Wiseguy": "No doubt this is another data point for the socialists to claim that is why they should tax the rich (even more). ... The fact that you are not a millionaire is more likely a function of yourselves, e.g., laziness, stupidity, don't care about money, overspending, making bad life decisions."
  • Said "Anarchist": "Distribute all that wealth among world's population and after one decade the same millionaires would reappear. Stupid do not become rich ... unless they inherit from others."
  • And a blast from the past, courtesy of WSJ reader "Anonymous": "Reminds me of Mark Twain's comment: 'I'm opposed to millionaires, but I'd take the job if they offered it to me.'"

More on MSN Money:

100Comments
Jun 1, 2011 2:43PM
avatar

A strong, healthy, viable middle class is necessary for a strong, healthy, and viable republic.


Our Republic cannot stand if the middle class continues to shrink.

Jun 1, 2011 1:58PM
avatar
Wow, you are telling me that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer? Shocking. The next great conflict in the United States won't be a Civil War or a race war but a class war. There are more poor people than rich people and more and the poor have less and less to lose. Some day in the future of the United States the poor and the middle class won't be willing to be the draft animals pulling the rich through life anymore and there will be bloodshed. You can only push and squeeze people so much. Oh and another thing, more poor and middle class people have guns than Chauncey the third, his wife Buffy and their rich friends...
Jun 1, 2011 5:29PM
avatar

Excuse ME for not being born with a silver spoon in my mouth!  I am so sick in tired of people saying that we are lazy, how do you know, because maybe that's what you are, sitting around the pool sipping martini's.  Well guess what the majority of working families are not lazy, nor are the millions of people who cannot find a job, which I am sure you will blame us for that as well.  We are very hard working people and always will be!

 

While the rich get richer and the middle class becomes extinct, and the poor, elder, disabled, homeless, getter poorer, and you wonder why we want the wealthy to pay more in taxes, maybe if they were in our shoes they might just understand what its like to live from pay check to pay check.  We pay more than our share in taxes, its time for the wealthy to pay their share as well, instead of finding all those loop holes from paying their fair share.

 

The Republicans in Washington, and all the states that are Republican controlled will pay the price in the next election, hell Wisconsin's 6 Republican Senators, and the Gov are seeing first hand just how pissed off the American People are, just wait watch and see!!! 

Jun 1, 2011 5:18PM
avatar
Here, in a way the old people who lived through the best years in American may be able to understand  : The buying power of min wage in 1970 would today have the buying power of a twenty dollar an hour job. The American worker has lost more to the buying power of average earned wage incomes every year sense 1970. And so, in average wages v. cost of living the American worker has never had a harder time making a go of it, not even during the last great depression. 
Jun 1, 2011 2:37PM
avatar
these people deserve tax breaks, like most wealthy people. Question: How do you pay for a war on 2 fronts and NOT raise taxes on the people who benefited from the war?? We are trillions in hock to the chicoms coz of GREED.
Jun 1, 2011 4:59PM
avatar
I've heard it for years... and I'm begining to see it come true. "One day there will be no middle class" or how about "The gap between the rich and the middle will keep getting larger." I'm all for people doing well financially, but many of those were probably on the back of the middle class. You know the types... the CEO's that raked in the bucks before the market tanked and ran off to Sweeden while those who invested in the company for their retirement were left with empty pockets.
Jun 1, 2011 2:17PM
avatar
It takes money to make money....... So if your scrounging week to week for $75 to go to work, $100 worth of groceries that don't amount to nothing then you don't have the money to make money.

Its true, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Invest in lead and copper in the form of ammo and stock up firearms.

Jun 1, 2011 6:49PM
avatar

I dont want to be rich...I'd just like to have enough.

 

Jun 1, 2011 4:02PM
avatar

So, here are some more numbers:

74% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck (if they get paychecks at all)

90% of Americans make less than 32,000  dollars a year

67% of seniors live in poverty

72% of Children live in poverty

43% of single mothers live in poverty

and

37% of all Americans live in poverty

That fact that 5.4 % of American HOUSEHOLDS (not of all Americans but of american households) hold more than $1,000,000 in wealth values does little more than support the fact that the GINI index (wealth distribution) in the United State is more like the gini index of a 'third world' dictatorship than any of the other so-called "first world" nations. 

And, by the way if millionaires create jobs, exactly how is it we have fewer livable wage job today in American (as a percentage of jobs per 100,000 people) than we did in the year 2000 and how is it that we lost some 5 million middle class jobs during the first four years after the Repugnut-con's tax break to the most wealthy 5% of Americans

Jun 1, 2011 2:33PM
avatar
All it means is the gulf between rich and poor continues to grow; there soon will be no "middle class". Also, why do these insipid videos have to start every time this page reloads? If I want to watch the video, I am perfectly capable of clicking on the "play" button myself, thank you very much. It 's a wonder that Lynn Mucken didn't say this is another reason we should love $5/gal. gasoline-- it creates more millionaires!
Jun 1, 2011 4:11PM
avatar
Who are these morons in the video?  Claiming that most Americans still feel like they have a chance at a peice of the pie?  Please....we work harder and harder, obtain more education only to make and have less.  I certainly am not under the delusion that I can be a millionaire some day.  Yet, these idiots believe that Americans believe just that!  Revolution can and will come if things do not change.  You can only push so far.  Hit a dog enough times, and he will bite you!!!  Our government and their rich lackey's would be wise to remember this!
Jun 1, 2011 4:34PM
avatar
Some of you older folks saying things like "I worked my butt off and now Im wealthy" or "work hard and you can have it too" are showing your age.  My generation (X) and those after me (Y) both graduated college into recessions.  My gen. during the dot-com bust and Y's during the "great recession".  NTM, college is a necessity.  Period.  There are few if any jobs available for those with only a high school diploma that actually pay a living wage.  And college has become exponentially more expensive.  It is not unusual for a graduate to be carrying tens of thousands of student loan debt when they leave school.  Tuition across this country has increased at more than 10 times the rate of inflation.  Even "cheap" public schools have raised rates to the point where it costs over $10k in tuition alone per year (and that is cheap!) not to mention books, supplies, student fees, lab fees, etc.  and the fact that they add more requirements every year for the same degree (this year at my local university, they added an "international credit" requirement for all bachelors degrees so there's another several hundred bucks added to the cost of obtaining a bachelors degree).  All of this adds up to an expensive education that is a requirement, just to be entry level!!!!  Maybe the boomer generations and the greatest generation and those before had the opportunity, but us younger generations have seen nothing but economic instability and the erosion of the value of our degrees and by proxy hard work into nothing.  So give it a rest!
Jun 1, 2011 6:48PM
avatar
Part Two:

The only way that I see America getting back to a strong-enough middle-class that can afford to buy homes again is through raising upper-income tax brackets back to historical norms while bringing our troops home, substantially cutting defense spending, cutting unfair and unneeded tax breaks for wealthy corporations, and acting to protect our own industries and jobs from unfair foreign competition.  We can manufacture almost all of our consumer products here at home just like we used to do.

Today's rich are getting richer precisely because they have been able to benefit from investment in the globalization of our jobs to the lowest-cost worldwide bidder who is willing to violate the most environmental protection laws.  What happens when China runs out of coal, oil, and enough fresh water to support their population in just 30 more years?  Perhaps you lucky few will just move your factories to the next cheapest place and attempt to dominate their workforce and ruin their local environment instead?

Giving the wealthy more money has not translated into job security or income growth for America's bottom 90%, no matter how much that worker productivity has improved.  The wealthy seem addicted to high levels of investment risk and ever-increasing profits, as Wall Street and other investment markets have become hardly any more than giant casinos.  There is absolutely no point in the average American worker even trying to play at the casino called Wall Street, when it is dominated by the big players, and investing in meager middle-income retirement funds has and will again cost the little guy his shirt, while the wealthy keep taking an ever-greater percentage of our available money supply.

There is nothing greater than the thrill of great financial victory, or more heartbreaking than the agony of a lifetime beset with a constantly diminishing financial expectation, punctuated by the occasional recession where far too many average Americans have lost everything that they have owned repeatedlySo, it would not surprise me in the least if someday the kind of organized revolutionary upset directed against the rich that we have seen in the Arab world this Spring visits our shores too.
Jun 1, 2011 4:09PM
avatar
Historically these conditions have preceded social unrest.
Brace yourself.
Jun 1, 2011 6:09PM
avatar
Some of the hardest working people in this country are poor and they will always be poor.  Our system is set up to benefit the rich.  Money buys the politicians and secures the policies that help the rich get richer.  Big investors and corporate executives pay lower tax rates than the middle class because dividends and capital gains are taxed much lower than earned income.  The middle class are losing their homes to investors who are scooping them up at bargain forclosure prices only to rent them back to the former middle class owners.  It is all by design to turn America into a wage earning slave economy with concentrated wealth for the few and poverty for the masses.  STAND UP FOR WORKING FAMILIES!
Jun 1, 2011 5:20PM
avatar

1M is still better to have than not but it is not as much money as it used to be even 10 years ago.

 

I remember in 2001 I could live on 1M for 60 years. I am still single and my expense items and habits are pretty much the same and 1M would be good enough for only 25 years.

 

We do not really think about it, but we are paying through the nose for the two wars and everything else. You work harder, you gat WAY less stuff for it. My first Saturn SL2 2001 was $14500 - totally pimped out (as for Saturn). In 2007 ION in the same configuration was $23000. I could eat like a king and drive to work on $400-$500 a month in 2001. But the gallon of fuel was $0.98 and a triple-decker club sandwich with drink and chips was 5.75.

 

Today I spend $1300-$1400 a month for exactly the same lifestyle with the same food in the same restaurants and the same driving distance. But today (I mean literally today) my burger with fries and drink was $12 at Five Guys. It costs $85 to refuel my car that does 29MPG - thanks God, so the tank lasts for an entire week.

 

Naturally I make more than in 2001, but somehow my lifestyle is exactly the same. I save more too (really less in value, but more in the numbers) and I am pretty sure that in 10 years I will be "a millionaire" too.

Jun 1, 2011 2:37PM
avatar
The rich get richer, the poor get poorer......
Jun 1, 2011 3:32PM
avatar

Reagan was wrong about trickle-down economics. When no less an authority than Warren Buffett says TDE is nonsense, I'm sold. Giving the wealthiest 5% of Americans a tax break (as if they really needed it) does not mean the lower income classes benefit. The wealthy keep the money and reinvest it. Buffett said the wealthy should pay more in taxes

 

“The rich are always going to say that, you know, just give us more money and we’ll go out and spend more and then it will all trickle down to the rest of you,” Buffett, chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway said in the interview. “But that has not worked the last 10 years, and I hope the American public is catching on.” - quoted from Bloomberg

Jun 1, 2011 6:49PM
avatar
Part One:

Chimed in "David Workman": "Being a millionaire just isn't what it used to be, when adjusting for inflation. Being a millionaire today is no harder than having a net worth of $100K in the 1960s. Now, having a net worth of $10 million? That's the new millionaire."

The above statement is very correct.  Just since I started into the workforce in the early 1970s the minimum wage has increased from $1.60 per hour to $7.25 per hour.  In 1979 I used to rent a 2-bedroom/2-bath 2-story desirable townhouse for $200 per month when I was earning $9.35 per hour working 50 hours per week in a large factory.  Gas was running $1.25 per gallon and food costs, utility costs, and health insurance coverage were all running at 1/4 or less of what they cost now.  Is my income now $37.40 per hour plus full included benefits including an employer-paid retirement plan?  An income of over $100K yearly is what would be necessary just to have kept pace with what I earned at the age of 22 working in a factory in 1979.

In 1982-83 I earned 25 cents per mile plus $10 per delivery or pickup driving a semi back and forth from Chicago to the East Coast delivering multi-stop refrigerated food products.  Is my income now 75 cents per mile plus $30 per stop, since my living costs have more than tripled since 1982?  No, in fact, my wages are only up 50% since 1982, despite my additional 30 years of experience in my field, which means that my buying power was double in 1982 over what it is now. 

For the average middle and working-class American, wages have been stagnant or have fallen heavily since the 1970s, while average incomes for those of us in the top 10% of the income heap have risen four-fold during the same period.  How long do you 10% types think that you can keep reaming the bottom 90% before there is trouble?  What has happened this Spring in both Egypt and Tunisia is what happens when the bottom 90% gets tired of getting walked all over.

Jun 1, 2011 6:31PM
avatar

"The strong performance of the financial markets accounted for the lion's share of the growth,"

 

The Ponzi schemes, outrageous fees/fines/fine print, minute-by-minute manipulations of the markets, oops-i'm-sorry lousy advice from "advisors", high-salaried "representatives" and "shrewd" bankers, commissions for real estate agents who don't do jack sh!t except unlock a door/withold information/fill in the blanks on template paperwork, and all the other rip-off "business" people who keep selling the American pipe dream that all us stupid, lazy, ignorant peons who bust our asses for 20 years, loyal to our companies and still get laid off/fired, keep buying into. I'm not crying; always knew what a scam consumerism is and I've been gladly working and studying since a babe (first job at 8 years old). Financial professionals get rich while others actually have to work.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

ABOUT SMART SPENDING

Smart Spending brings you the best money-saving tips from MSN Money and the rest of the Web. Join the conversation on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

TOOLS

More