Fastest cars with the cheapest insurance
Baby, you're much too fast -- but that doesn't mean you'll overpay for insurance. Check out these numbers.
This post comes from Emmet Pierce at partner site Insure.com.
I guess we should have known by the way you parked your car sideways that you like to drive fast (as Prince famously said). So we performed a review of high-performance cars and the cost of auto insurance. Insure.com has found some insurance bargains among cars that deliver quick acceleration.
And you say, "What have I got to lose?" Not much -- you can drive a powerful auto without paying top dollar for your coverage.
A variety of factors are used to calculate insurance rates. Insurance companies base their premiums on the perceived risk of paying out injury and damage claims. They consider safety features that protect drivers, the likelihood of vehicle theft, and the cost of repairing and replacing parts.
Believe it or not, we started to worry, wondering if we had enough data -- but we've found some choices that deliver speed and a relatively lower insurance bill. (How does your vehicle compare on insurance rates?) Post continues after video.
You need a love that's going to last
The Chevrolet Corvette GS two-door convertible, for example, has a national average annual insurance premium of $1,802. When you factor in the car's 0-to-60 mph acceleration rate of 4 seconds, you have an average premium cost of $450.50 per second.
In comparison, the Mercedes SL65 AMG has a 0-to-60 acceleration rate of 4.5 seconds and an average annual premium of $3,544. That gives the slower-accelerating vehicle an average premium cost of $787.56 per second, nearly 75% more than the Corvette GS. (Insure.com's average rates are based on what a 40-year-old male with a good driving record would pay.)
Among the 44 automobiles Insure.com reviewed that travel from 0 to 60 mph in 5 seconds or less, the best car insurance bargain -- as calculated by cost per second -- was the Chevrolet Camaro SS. While not the quickest car in the group, the Camaro SS still has a relatively fast acceleration rate of 5 seconds. But the Camaro SS has a cost-per-second insurance rate of $324, compared with $687.35 for the ZR1. That means you'll pay 112% more for car insurance to shave 1.6 seconds off your acceleration time with the ZR1. That's on the verge of being obscene!
You're moving much too fast
Our study found that the Ford Mustang GT two-door coupe and the Mercedes C63 AMG each have a 0-to-60 acceleration rate of 4.3 seconds. The Mustang GT has an average cost-per-second insurance premium of $401.40 compared with $633.02 for the C63. That means the Mercedes owner pays 58% more per second of acceleration time.
Whichever speedy car you choose, honey, you've got to slow down, because if you don't you're going to run your little car right in the ground.
Fast cars with cheap auto insurance
Here are the top 10 for the 2011 model year, followed by the average national premium, acceleration from 0 to 60 mph, and the insurance cost per second of acceleration time:
- Chevrolet Camaro 22 -- $1,620, 5 seconds, $324 per second.
- Dodge Challenger R/T -- $1,757, 5 seconds, $351.40 per second.
- Ford Mustang GT convertible -- $1,696, 4.7 seconds, $360.85 per second.
- Ford Mustang GT coupe -- $1,726, 4.3 seconds, $401.40 per second.
- Chevrolet Corvette coupe -- $1,741, 4.2 seconds, $414.52 per second.
- Audi S5 4.2 Quattro -- $1,995, 4.8 seconds, $415.63 per second.
- Chevrolet Corvette convertible -- $1,782, 4.2 seconds, $424.29 per second.
- BMW M3 -- $2,013, 4.7 seconds, $428.30 per second.
- Lexus IS F -- $1,979, 4.6 seconds, $430.22 per second.
- Chevrolet Corvette GS convertible -- $1,802, 4 seconds, $450.50 per second.
You can find the entire list of 20 cars and the rankings methodology here.
More on Insure.com and MSN Money:
Camaro - $1,600, 5 seconds, $320 per second.
Corvette - $1,600, 4 seconds, $400 per second.
Are you kidding me?
Pontaic GTO 04-06, cheap as dirt. G8 or GXP, not to shabby either. I'm surprised the M3 isn't more. Why with all that aluminum sitting on the front end it's got to give insurance companies a heart attack. From the control arms, end links...heck, even the strut housing is, you guess it....aluminum. You really do get what you paid for.
I'd think the challenger would be cheaper than the Camaro SS. It seems to appeal to an older demographic (although in my opinion, the coolest looking of them all.) Then again, it comes in at a higher price point.
Out of them all I think the corvette coupe is a straight up steal. Not just sub 4's but a capable fully realized suspension at bargain basement prices.
The best way to get your speed fix at corolla prices is buy a moderate performance car used and mod the ever loving crap out of it.
Worthless article.. Comparing cars that cost $60-250,000 with cars that cost $30-50k and saying that it is cheaper to insure the cheaper cars.. duh..
I know value of the car is not everything, and actually brand has a lot to do with it..
I owned a 2006 Ford Mustang GT that cost (used) $25k. I added a supercharger to it, and with other performance modifications, it had over 550 hp and replacement value was over $38k. Insurance was $75 per month for full coverage.
I just bought a 2001 Porsche Boxster S. It has 250 hp and has a replacement value around $15k. Slower, cheaper, and handles better, yet insurance is over $100 per month for full coverage.
So a car 1/3 the value, half as fast, that handles better and is less likely to lose control IF it is driven hard, costs 30% more to insure, simply because it has the brand name "Porsche".
If you were going to write an article about insurance vs. different sport cars, that is what the focus should be. And how about a little research outside of google, like into why a mild sports car like a Boxster S has an insurance "performance" rating of 24, when a BMW Z3 M has a rating of 17, and a new Mustang GT has a rating of 12, when they are all similar performance cars.. ? It is PURELY a brand stereotype. Some bean counter decided that if the car starts with a P, it is going to have a driver behind the wheel that will drive like he stole it, where if the brand starts with an F, the driver will drive it like it is a Honda.. Why?
yharlie, Are you from this planet? Of course the insurance company will pay if you have an accident while speeding, or if you run a red light or drive drunk, etc. Otherwise 90% of claims would never be paid. One of the ways used to determine liability in a claim is the issuance of a violation. If you get one your insurance company is likely to be the one paying. How can such ignorant people not be embarrassed to post idiotic comments! Why do you think that people with more violations pay higher insurance rates. Because they are more likely to be in an accident that the insurance company will have to pay for.
The math in this article is so flawed it's ridiculous. Are there any people left in the "news" business with common sense. Insurance companies use tons of information to determine rates and if you choose to purchase a car based on just $ to seconds in 0-60 tests you are likely to end up with a slow cheap car. The article proves that. The Camaro is the slowest cheapest car of the bunch.
Get real and right an article that is worth reading!
you forgot to figure cost of cars. Very important . BMW and Buick drivers are so bad it is figured in rates.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.