Is it too late for a happy retirement?
Maybe you can relate: A reader sees retirement looming on the horizon, but she hasn't saved nearly enough. What can she do?
This post comes from Stacy Johnson at partner site Money Talks News.
Over the past couple of years, I've been working to get my financial life in order -- but I'm worried it's too late. I rent an apartment with my 13-year-old son, have no debts, have $4,000 in my emergency fund, and a work 401k with $35,000 in it. It doesn't sound so bad, except that I'm 57 years old. According to my calculations, I'll have to work until I'm 70 years old and live to 84. Do you have any suggestions or comments?
The first comment I'll make, Susan, is that you're in a crowded boat. I'm more or less in the same one, and I'll bet there are plenty of people reading this who are, too.
How did we get here?
When my father passed away a few years ago, he had been retired for close to 30 years. Despite the fact that he never made more than $50,000 in a single year, he was never short of cash in retirement. Between military and civilian benefits, he was bringing in nearly as much retired as he made working: $45,000 a year. And because he lived a very modest life in a place with a low cost of living (suburban Atlanta), he saved more of his retirement income than he spent.
His son, on the other hand -- yours truly -- faces a much different future. Having been self-employed for more than 30 years, the only pension I'll be getting is from Social Security, and the only other income I'll have is what I can generate from my investments and retirement accounts. Unlike my dad, nobody but me is contributing to my retirement. I don't have a company pension or anyone matching my retirement plan contributions.
I also have another problem: I don't live in a low-cost area. The property taxes alone on my modest Fort Lauderdale home are 10 times what my father paid -- enough to consume one-third to one-half of my expected income from Social Security.
Of course, I made this bed myself. I chose where I live and what I do for a living. But millions more find themselves in this situation because of something they couldn't control. Namely, the replacement of traditional company pensions (called defined-benefit plans) with the retirement plan more prevalent today (called defined contribution).
Defined-benefit pension plans are like Social Security. They guarantee a monthly check for life. You can't outlive the money, and the risk of having enough set aside is the company's -- not the employee's. In my father's day, these were common and funded by the employer. Defined-contribution plans, on the other hand, shift the burden to the employee. These plans -- think 401k -- have no guarantees and are largely funded by you.
Result? You contribute as much as you can afford, then hope the market doesn't melt down on the eve of your retirement and that your balance is enough to keep you comfortable for the rest of your life. If it isn't, that's your problem, not the company's.
According to this 2011 study from consulting firm Towers Watson, in 2002, 83% of Fortune 100 companies provided defined-benefit pension plans. Today that number has dropped to 30%. That increases the likelihood that, with each passing day, more people will be in this scary boat. Post continues below.
What can we do?
While I do have a lot more saved than Susan, depending on what happens and how I choose to live, it still might not be enough. For example, if interest rates stay this low, generating an adequate income (at least safely) from my retirement savings will be tough. That leaves me with one or a combination of the following choices:
- Radically reduce my cost of living when I retire, perhaps by moving to a lower-cost home here in Fort Lauderdale or somewhere else.
- Accumulate as much as possible now, then pray for considerably higher interest rates on low-risk accounts by the time I retire.
- Keep working past traditional retirement age.
- Supplement my retirement income by spending my principal, then hope I'm dead before it runs out.
- Take a measured amount of risk with my retirement savings to create more.
These are my choices, and Susan's as well. And what she and I will do is probably a combination of all of them.
All of us -- Susan, you and me -- need to put as much money aside as we possibly can. How?
- Spend less, save more. One way to spend less and save more is to create a savings goal, then find the money to reach it by creating a spending plan, also known as a budget.
- Pay less interest. Since paying interest on debt steals money we could be saving, we need to get rid of it.
- Save smart. When it comes to making our savings work as hard for us as we do for them, we need to learn to take an acceptable level of risk. We also need to get the highest interest possible on our savings.
- Make more. Since what you make now will influence what you'll have later, get the highest pay you can. See "The 5 best ways to make more money."
Susan also recognized what may be the only true solution: "work until I'm 70 years old."
While that may sound depressing, it doesn't have to be. Because in an ideal world, none of us would be "working" at all.
Unlike my dad, I love what I do, which means I don't "work," at least in the sense of doing something I hate in exchange for money. If I win the lottery today, I'll still be sitting here tomorrow. Granted, I certainly want to work less as I age, as well as have the ability to not work at all if I choose.
But what we all should be seeking are careers that keeps us coming back for more, especially if retirement looks murky. Because if you use every trick in the personal-finance book and still won't have enough to retire, doing something meaningful and rewarding is the only way your later years will be golden, both physically and emotionally.
I wish I could provide a magic bullet -- a simple solution that would guarantee that those approaching retirement without sufficient savings could lead the life they've worked for and deserve. But finding work they love may ultimately be their only salvation.
More on Money Talks News and MSN Money:
So, this is an absolute waste of space. Find a job you love may be your ultimate salvation?? Um, OK, great. Now, consider that, realistically, probably 90% of all jobs fall outside of the realm of lovable. Tolerable, sometimes enjoyable, but certainly not lovable. But you know, that's OK, because WORK isn't supposed to be 100% enjoyable - if it were, it'd be called PLAY. So is your advice useful to the majority of us?? Hell no!
How is it that you've been in the workforce for 30+ years and all that you have to show for it is $35k??? I'm 29 and I have more than that by not even saving that aggressively. And I live in the Washington DC area, which is a hell of alot more expensive than Atlanta or Ft Lauderdale.
I'd also say check your calculations. No way in hell you're going to retire at 70 if you're 57 now w $35k in retirement, unless you inherit some money or plan on dying when you're 72.
My husband and I will be retiring in 49 months when he is 55 and I am 53. Whenever I think about retirement I thank my parents and my husbands parents for being such a good influence on us. They taught us to live within our means, pay ourselves first and work somewhere you get a pension with lifetime medical. At first, at 22 and 21 we did not think it was a big deal. At that point it was more attractive to spend money and have fun things like a nice car and various other toys. Shortly afterwards I can remember just being happy to have medical insurance and pay the mortgage. Then we began to realize having that pension and medical was going to be a phenomenal asset and bonus to expedite our retirement. There was the realization about 20 years ago that our parents were right and if we planned appropriately we'd retire young like they did. That is when I put the 25 year plan in place and, thankfully, my husband agreed to it and supports it 100%.
We make a combined income of approximately $152K and we owe nothing on credit cards and our home is nearly paid off. We live in a high cost area and the basics like homeowners insurance and taxes will take a chunk out of our retirement, but we continue to plan to live within our means. Having all the toys in the front yard and working until 70 was never appealing to us. Paying cash for college for our kids, however, was.
On top of our pension we've saved $450K into a 403b (and will still save another $100K before we leave) and it is my hope that we never have to touch it so that our children can inherit it. Unfortunately the youth of our nation will probably never have the same opportunity we did to find a job where there is a guaranteed retirement income let alone lifetime medical.
What I am about to say next will certainly draw some attention because this puts us into a small percentage of people preparing to retire. We unfortunately only have my mother left, but my father, mother in law and father in law have passed all passed away. We my husbands parents died he inherited over $800K and property from my in-laws. We have yet to spend a penny of the inherited money. We have multiple friends who are in the same position and have bought fancy new cars, lavish vacations, remodeled their homes or put in pools. We just don't feel that it is right to frivolously spend money that they worked so hard to accumulate.
I am mostly writing this because I just can't see how young people today can possibly hope to retire at 55 let alone 70. People who work around me, but are 10 - 15 years younger do not own a home, have no retirement savings, and need every penny they earn to support their lifestyle. This is before they have even started a family. My hope for them is to get out of debt and start paying themselves first. You just need a budget to get started.
We tell our kids all the time how important it is to plan for your future. I hope that we've made an impact on them like our parents did on us. They will likely inherit a lot of money, but they have no clue and we've told them that it is their responsibility to make it on their own.
You think the republicans are destroying retirement? Our country is going bankrupt from all of the goverment sponsored pensions, union pensions, and social security, and medicare. These programs were designed at a time that a worker would retire and pass away within 5-10 years. Now people are collecting pensions for 30-40 years. Not sustainable! These are all programs which were started by the democrat party. There is no way that we can fiscally maintain these programs when the the number of workers per retiree is declining. It is logistics and the bounty which we have experienced is the past is just that- a thing of the past. We are going to have to learn to take care of ourselves and live within our means. That means to purchase needs and not wants- not everybody "deserves a vacation". There is no more golden goose.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
A Fidelity study found that adult kids and their folks aren't on the same page when it comes to discussing finances.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'