
A major change is coming to Medicare
A lawsuit settlement will end a Medicare policy that deprives chronically ill people of needed care.
Here's a Medicare rule I didn't even know existed until a lawsuit settlement dealt it a death blow last week: Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing care or therapy for patients who are not expected to get better.
That's right. It doesn't matter if the skilled care or therapy would make your life less miserable or slow your downhill slide. Think of the special care needed for those with Alzheimer's or Parkinson's or chronic lung disease.
That's going to change. The Los Angeles Times explains: "Under the terms of the settlement -- expected to be approved by a federal judge in Vermont in coming months -- Medicare would not deny skilled nursing care and various forms of therapy for beneficiaries, regardless of their prognosis."
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services called the settlement a mere clarification of the rules and downplayed the impact.
But others say this is a huge development. The New York Times, which broke the story about the lawsuit settlement, said tens of thousands could expect to benefit. Other say it could help hundreds of thousands of Medicare recipients.
The New York Times said: "Under the agreement, which amounts to a significant change in Medicare coverage rules, Medicare will pay for such services if they are needed to 'maintain the patient's current condition or prevent or slow further deterioration,' regardless of whether the patient's condition is expected to improve."
According to The Associated Press:
"Those who stand to benefit include not only people with intractable conditions like Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's and chronic lung disease. Those who are growing weaker because of advancing age, placing them at greater risk of falls and other problems, also could be helped."
The class action includes more than 10,000 Medicare patients whose claims for skilled nursing care and therapy were denied before the suit was filed. But no one knows how many Medicare recipients have simply gone without these services because they were told that Medicare wouldn't pay for them and they couldn't afford the cost themselves.
Also unknown is the financial impact to Medicare, already a large drain on the federal budget. But paying for improved care now could reduce more costly treatment and hospital stays later on.
Another odd aspect to this case is that the rule that's being rewritten -- the so-called "improvement standard" -- isn't in the law that created Medicare nearly a half century ago or in government regulations. It's spelled out in a Medicare manual and in the rules used by private contractors hired by Medicare to decide which claims are paid and which are not.
Who all stands to benefit after the judge approves the settlement? Medicare is a government health insurance program for those 65 and older and younger people with disabilities.
Have you or someone in your family been denied coverage under Medicare's improvement standard?
More on MSN Money:
- 6 changes to Social Security in 2013
- 8 Social Security myths exposed
- How to pick a 2013 Medicare drug plan
- Smart Spending on the go: Get our app for Android or iPhone
- How the Obamacare penalty will work
- Know the facts on new 3.8% tax
First the truth. Do you think active and retired senior senators and congessmen and presidents DON'T get whatever care they or their family members need?
Doesn't logic show that a senior cared for in their home by a trained, well paid care giver is tremendously LESS expensive then care in a hospital? Billions less! over the next 10-20 years. Would not training these care givers create hundreds of thousands of jobs? In the next 10-20 years over 1/4 of our citizens will be over 65.
Now the real truth, where are the compassionate, republicans and democrats that believe that all Americans deserve the dignity and care. We all know someone in our family, a friend, who does or will need care.
I really don't care that it is a "drain" on the Federal budget. We can stop spending money frivolously on other social issues and giving money to other countries and help our own. Also, we can stop giving freebies to the "illegals" and send them home where they belong until they come here the legal way. I am really tired of the bureaucrats,
My Father is in a Skilled Nursinf Facility and as great medical insurace but it won't pay for his skilled nursing because he has alzheimers and doesn't show emouh improvement with the physical and occupational therapy. So his savings is now being drained at a rate of over $200 per day for his care until he qualifies for medicaid.
Such a shame to worek for everything and pay for good insurance to be denied coverage for a stupid rule of interpitation.
Where has the author of this piece been? If she isn't knowlegeable about Medicare policies, why is she chosen to present an article on this policy, which has been in place for years, and is, like most Medicare policy, a complex issue. There are clearly rationale, and humane benefits from this change in policy. Maitenance of function and prevention of further decline are desirable objectives, but because of the "self-pilot" nature of much of Medicare's payment methods, this change will lead to much abuse. People who view therapy as a paid-for exercise club or social event will try to take advantage of the new policy. Medicare will have to design policies that require evidence the therapy helps achieve these desirable objectives, just as it now requires that evidence of improvement is present. This will not be easy, as EVERYONE in my age group (78) is declining in one way or another. By the way, my wife is an amputee in a wheel chair (routine knee replacement gone bad) who has had lots of therapy in the past two years. This new policy will surely raise Medicare costs further, just when how to reduce those costs is central to the political debate. I am a retired health policy analyst, if you couldn't tell.
The government already covers Long Term Care. State Medicaid begins after the personsl assets are used up because the government can't afford $3500 per month on the low side per beneficiary until the that person has used up their own funds. And the State programs are funded or subsidized by the Federal Government. Doing the math at 10,000 known denied claims means an additional 35 million dollars per month from the tax coffers, and that's before opening the flood gates for the mass population. Medicare just can't afford that, and the tax payers can't support it.
RELATED ARTICLES
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
Yes, sometimes retail therapy has a place. Just try to be aware of shopping to beat the blues, and don't overspend.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
TOOLS
- Best rates on savings
Find the highest rates on savings accounts, CDs and money market accounts.
- Are you saving enough for retirement?
- Find a great credit card
- Car insurance premiums by model




