Libor scandal for dummies
This outrage may have affected millions worldwide -- including you.
This post comes from Stacy Johnson at partner site Money Talks News.
In recent weeks, a scandal has been unfolding that could potentially make the Wall Street Bernie look like Sesame Street Bernie. And yet, despite the trillions of dollars involved, the sheer audacity of the fraud, and the irony of so many leaders clamoring for less bank regulation -- Mitt Romney, along with many in Congress, have called for repeal of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act -- there hasn't been much in the mainstream media about Libor.
Other than the name, the Libor scandal isn't all that complicated. In the video below, I ask a finance professor to explain it in simple language. Check it out, then meet me on the other side for more.
How Libor works
You probably don't think much about where interest rates come from. On everything from credit cards to savings accounts, you're presented with a rate, then you simply decide whether to take it or not. Whether you're borrowing or investing, you logically assume the rates you pay or earn are set by competition.
But as you learned in the video above, interest rates on trillions of dollars worth of financial products start with a benchmark called the London Interbank Offered Rate, or Libor.
While the label makes it sound complicated, it's just the average interest rate big banks pay to borrow from each other. It's called "London" because it's computed in that city. But that's misleading, because it affects interest rates worldwide on some (but not all) adjustable-rate mortgages, credit cards, and student, car, and other types of loans. In addition to loans, it's also used to set rates for institutional investments -- the kind that mutual funds, pension funds, and government agencies might use to earn interest on short-term investments.
What's the problem?
Libor isn't set by supply and demand. It's not set by the market or the government. Instead, it depends on the banks involved (including giants like Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Barclays) to accurately report the interest rates they'd have to pay to borrow from each other. The highest and lowest rates are thrown out, the rest are averaged, and Libor is set.
So Libor depends on honesty. If banks don't tell the truth, Libor won't be accurate -- nor will the interest rates on trillions of dollars worth of loans and investments.
Why would they lie?
Banks would lie about the rates they'd pay to borrow for two reasons.
- The first is to make themselves seem stronger than they are. As with you and me, if a bank is a good risk, it will pay less interest. So if a bank reports that the rate it pays to borrow from other banks is low, the financial world will think it's strong.
- The other reason a bank may want to lie about what it costs it to borrow is to make money. Major international banks do more than lend. They also trade stocks, bonds, and all kinds of other investments for the same reason any investor does: to make a profit.
Traders working for banks participating in Libor could simply buy an investment that goes up when rates fall, then lie about their rates in an attempt to lower Libor. In short, they could manipulate the market and position their investments to make money, essentially trading on inside information. This is especially true if banks magnified the impact of their reporting by colluding with one another.
How does it affect me?
If Libor was manipulated, the results could be far-reaching. Since Libor is the benchmark for many other rates, an inaccurate Libor means millions of people all over the globe might have paid more or less interest than they should have. If rates were artificially low, borrowers for things like adjustable-rate mortgages and student loans would have benefited. But investors like cities, mutual funds, and pension plans may have earned less than they should have.
The extent and impact of Libor manipulations is still unknown. The effect on the average consumer is probably small, but as the professor in the video above said, it could be measurable to people with large loans tied to Libor, like those with adjustable-rate mortgages.
What's happened so far?
In late June, Barclays agreed to pay $450 million to settle accusations it had lied in an attempt to manipulate Libor. Other banks participating in Libor are now under investigation, with many experts predicting more banks will be writing similar checks in the days ahead.
What should I do?
First and foremost, be mad.
Be mad that you're expected to play by the rules in a system where the biggest players don't. Be mad at regulators who didn't properly regulate. Be mad that making billions in profits isn't enough for some financial institutions; they have to game the system to make even more. And be suspicious when you hear someone insisting banks are over-regulated.
More on Money Talks News and MSN Money:
Forget the Dodd-Frank Wallstreet Reform! It's a piece of crap with a LOT of loopholes! It was nothing but a facade - something to make them both look good to the Average American, but still let their Wall Street buddies make money.
REINSTATE GLASS-STEAGALL!! That can be done by either a vote by Congress or simply by an Executive order from a president! THAT'S the real reform. We must start pressing our elected officials to address this.
From the above article=Mitt Romney, along with many in Congress, have called for repeal of the Dodd Frank Wall street reform and consumer protection act.
The above statement means, that the big banks, have Romney, and most of the repubs in congress in there back pocket.
"And be suspicious when you hear someone insisting banks are over-regulated."
That statement would lead you to believe that what the criminals did was legal to begin with. It was not. It was ILLEGAL. The regulations were already in place. The same argument is always trotted out about gun control. Criminals don't follow laws or regulations. This applies whether they wear a pair of jeans and a t-shirt, or a three piece suit and tie with matching hankie.
Why is it that when someone breaks a law or ignores a regulation, the knee jerk reaction is to say, we need more regulations. As if those that ignore the first regulations already in place, will somehow be less inclined to ignore yet another set of regulations.
Enforce the first set and send some people to jail for a long time and the message will become clear.
It seems to me that the government are thieves just like the banks.
Liberals vote for personality cults, because so many people disagree with their basic tenets that they have to hope a Messianic leader can BS people with pie-in-the-sky fantasies so that they will ignore common sense - like "we can spend more than we make."
They are no different than the religious people - liberalism is a belief system, no different than Christianity or Islam, with little basis in reality.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
More than half of online shoppers say they've purchased from sites whose security seemed questionable, and most said they would provide personal data not normally needed for a transaction.