Students aren't learning much in college
A new study raises more questions about the value of a degree.
With new graduates facing high rates of both debt and unemployment, the value of a college degree has come into question. Now, a new study raises even more doubts about whether that $25,000 a year you're spending to send Junior to college is worth it: He isn't learning much.
At least that's the conclusion of professors Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa, who found that learning is taking a back seat on campus as instructors focus on research and students focus on their social lives. Their study of 2,300 students at 24 colleges and universities found that, after two years of college, 45% of the students showed little academic gain. Plus, 36% showed little gain after four years.
"These are really kind of shocking, disturbing numbers," Arum, a professor at New York University, told USA Today. "Students are able to navigate through the system quite well with little effort."
Here's how the authors summarized their conclusions in their new book, "Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses":
Growing numbers of students are sent to college at increasingly higher costs, but for a large proportion of them the gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and written communication are either exceedingly small or empirically nonexistent. …
More troubling still, the limited learning we have observed in terms of the absence of growth in CLA (Collegiate Learning Assessment) performance is largely consistent with the accounts of many students, who report that they spend increasing numbers of hours on nonacademic activities, including working, rather than on studying.
Questions have been raised in recent months about the benefits of high-cost law school education, as well as whether students are getting their money's worth at for-profit colleges. Rising student debt and high levels of unemployment or underemployment for graduates have added to the consternation and caused more students and parents to look at the cost vs. benefit of a college degree. Post continues after video.
The study measured student achievement by scores on a standardized test called the Collegiate Learning Assessment, which measures critical thinking, analytic reasoning and writing. The study did not measure specialized training students received in their major fields of study, and it did find differences among colleges. The research found that the students were spending 50% less time studying than students did a decade ago, but they still managed to earn a 3.2 grade-point average.
And how have those students done since they graduated? This is what Arum told The New York Times:
- 60% have full-time jobs.
- 36% have moved back home to live with parents or relatives.
- 10% are carrying more than $60,000 of debt.
- 66% of those with jobs are earning less than $35,000 a year.
- 45% of those with jobs are earning $15,000 a year or less.
Is college still worth it? What needs to change to make sure students get a tangible benefit from all the money they and their parents invest in education?
More from MSN Money:
Certain social groups on campus focus on partying. The academic requirements within these are merely in place to placate the deans and president of the universities.
I guess this is a means and seriousness test. Do you have the means to pay for a 4 year party for your child? Or do you wish to house a child who has been released from his/her employment because he/she could not perform the job duties with the competency specified by the degree he/she holds? Do you wish to pay for the kid's school loans because of this?
If you child was a partier in high school, waiting a couple of years for maturity to set in would be a better option for your wallet and the academic records of your child. A few years working for $7.50 an hour in a monotonous, going nowhere job creates some maturity to move onto college.
for a large proportion of them the gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and written communication are either exceedingly small or empirically nonexistent.
Of course not. That's because the largest gains are going to happen at an earlier stage of development. I would expect to see the gains become smaller as the students get older, unless they're stunted in their intellectual growth in high school.
Take my profession, for instance (music): the largest gain occurs when a beginner goes from not being able to play at all, to holding an instrument and being able to play simple songs. The next biggest is being able to go from imitating a teacher's interpretation to forming one's own interpretive opinion, which in my observation often coincides with other, across-the-board "coming of age" factors. The more sohisticated they get, the smaller the gains are going to be -- objectively speaking, at least, since they may still feel like they have to work very hard to achieve a small but important gain.
College is where one goes to specialize in a field. That's exactly the point, and yet exactly what this study apparently ignored. Social skills are serious business when it's the difference between potential employers calling you back, or not; I would think with all the hullaballoo about texting and Facebook, that would be less of a gripe. While it's true that there may be other, less expensive ways to be put in daily contact with the right people, it can be hard to break into the culture of an area without having gone through it that way.
To conclude, there's enough evidence of grade inflation. This is a stretch.
Students need to be taught in high school HOW to learn. College is for improving the HOW to learn skills, and for focusing on the WHAT they want to learn to do in their lives (What it is, how it works, why it works, etc). Obviously, they would have to think a little about WHAT in high school, but mostly they need to learn HOW first. Otherwise, kids end up going from major to major to major and spend a ridiculous amount of time in college for no reason.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
Which store penalizes you for too many returns? And which one will let you retroactively apply coupons?