Can bankruptcy solve student debt woes?
Allowing Americans to wipe out some student debt by filing for bankruptcy will do little to help most families.
This post comes from AnnaMaria Andriotis at partner site SmartMoney.
A federal agency is asking Congress to consider letting people wipe out some of their student debt by filing for bankruptcy protection. Consumer advocates, however, say the move will do little to help the vast majority of families struggling with college loans.
Richard Cordray, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, suggested the change to the bankruptcy rules last week in conjunction with a report criticizing private lenders. A 2005 law preventing borrowers from discharging private student loan debt in bankruptcy failed to prompt lenders to lower rates as promised, he said during a media call.
But even if Congress changes the private-loan policy, federal loans -- which account for about 85% of the more than $1 trillion in outstanding student debt -- would still not be dischargeable through bankruptcy, says Mark Kantrowitz, the publisher of FinAid.org, a student loan tracker. (Post continues below video.)
And the federal loans are not only much more common, they also default at nearly twice the rate. Approximately 9% of the total dollar amount of federal loans outstanding is in default compared with roughly 5% of private student loan dollars, according to data from the Department of Education and FinAid.org.
The recommendation comes at a time when student debt is rising rapidly. Since June 2005, debt has soared from $430 billion to more than $1 trillion, with many Americans across all age groups struggling to keep up with payments. With the aim of easing some of that burden, last month Congress voted in favor of extending the 3.4% rate for new federal subsidized Stafford loans for one more year. Rates on those loans, whose interest is paid by the government while borrowers are in school, were set to double if Congress didn't intervene. Experts say more aid may come soon.
Though private loans are often criticized for giving borrowers fewer options to stretch out payments in times of distress, the repercussions for those behind on federal loans are often worse. Private lenders and the federal government can both garnish borrowers' wages, but the government has a much greater reach. After borrowers default on federal student loans, the government can also keep their income tax refunds and withhold part of their Social Security checks during retirement.
Roughly 850,000 private loans that went into repayment from 1998 to 2009 are in default, according to the CFPB. During that same period, nearly 2.1 million federal student loan borrowers defaulted within two years of entering repayment, according to data from the Department of Education.
But allowing federal loans to be discharged through bankruptcy may be a nonstarter, officials say, as taxpayers would be saddled with the cost.
More from SmartMoney and MSN Money:
We want our young people educated, but we want to make a lot of money on them and enslave them in the process.............forever.
And why do universities always build such a lot of overpriced buildings, administered by legions of administrative clones who just munch down a big lunch and carry home a huge paycheck for their otherwise dumb job?
We are about to price our colleges and universities out of the reach of anyone except (foreign) state-supported foreign students. That's who's geting the tech jobs at half the pay and crowding out the U.S. citizens who played the education game and are losing their shirts because of it.
Thank lobbying for that. Another word for lobbying is CORRUPTION. Why pretend any longer?
A student today may acquire well over $100,000 in student debt to get a degree. Consider it a mortgage. The problem is, this mortgage has a higher interest rate than most current home mortgages, and a much shorter time period to repay. If I buy a $100,000 home, and pay 4% interest over 30 years, it is much more affordable than that same loan, but at 6.8% (and that is only the federal rate - artificially 1/2 that currently), payable in 10 years.
Most of us hold off on buying the home until we can afford the payment, but the student loan repayment starts 6 months after graduating, unless deferred, during which time it till accrues interest, as it did all the way through school, and it does not matter if the student has a job sufficient to make the payments.
Those of you older folks complaining about the younger folks and their debt simply do not know what is going on. Most students would prefer to pay their debt, it is financially impossible to do so. When I went to college, I had no student debt, but I had the Vietnam GI Bill to pay my living expenses, and the PELL Grant covered the cost of school ($4500 for the year). When I went to law school later, three years of law school cost me over $100,000 in loan debt. You know why? financial institutions know we can't discharge the debt, so they raised borrowing limits, and colleges know that money is out there, so tuition costs are skyrocketing. Kids want the education, but it is no longer economically viable. We are going to have to hire Chinese engineers, chemists, etc; to do the work because American students have been priced out of the market.
The problem here is not the need to get rid of the student loan repayment, but to reduce the astronomical costs it takes to get a college education. I received my BA from a state school which I paid $18,000 for. But later in life had to obtain an MBA to advance my career and it cost me $25,000 which I am paying for the next 10 years. The job I was able to get does make up for the cost, but it is still more than I felt it should be.
We need to find a way to lower the costs of education, and its not with more scholarships. The more "free" educations a college gives out the more it costs the rest of the paying students. Scholarships should be for the exceptional students, not anyone who breathes and can't afford to pay. I worked full time throughout all my years in college and so can others.
This is the next bubble!!! The World, let alone the US, will go into a total tail spin if students and their parents start to default on their loans. We need to be smarter on how much we hand out and make sure that it gets paid back! The population is still growing at a rapid pace and we need to make sure that everyone who can AFFORD it, gets an education. There are many capable community colleges that can get you started for much less than a University! Have you watched these shows on the TV like Campus PD? These kids now a days think they are invincible! Is this how you want our dollars to be spent?? Someone needs to made accountable?? The answer is WHO? The US Government can't always be the one bailing everyone out!! What happen to the good old days?? Morales?? Ethics?? I'm afraid for our future has a race not just a country! The good old days are gone and its only going to get worse! WAKE UP!
This shows the entitlement mentality of you younger people. Your educational assistance is there to provide you a chance to EARN a better paying job, and brighter future. And with that assistance comes the responsiblity for you to pay for your education. Quite your whinning, and pay your debt you bunch of free loaders!
Those of us who provided you with a home, and food, or other assistance don't owe your debt for giving you access with a better future. Your education is your burden for that potential brighter future, not another burden for your parents to carry.
My oldest son is taking paying back his college debt seriously. My third son is going to community college now.
Those who were careless in running up high education debts want the taxpayers to bail them out.
That means the irresponsible want those who were responsible to bail them out.
I say no. If you don't want to pay the loan back, don't take the loan in the first place.
Perhaps the kids thinking about college need to hear a few good horror stories so they will learn to be responsible with how much college debt they take on.
If my memory serves me correctly, it was President Clinton in the early 90's who signed the bill that barred federal student loan debt from bankruptcy, except where the debtor can show extreme hardship, which usually involves medical issues or old age. Later President George W. Bush added private loans. My recollection is that the reason for making these changes in the law was to increase the amount of loans students could receive by lenders. It was believed that lenders would be more likely to lend if they knew the loans could not later be discharged in bankruptcy and that the economy was robust enough to provide the student borrowers with job opportunities which would be adequate to repay the loans.
However, the economy has changed much since the 90's. Education costs have soared. Jobs for college graduates are scarce. Education grants, which do not need to be repaid, are now available to many students. I do not know whether the reasons for banning student loan debts from bankruptcy protection still applies.
The federal government has no problem dumping millions of taxpayer dollars into AIG, banks, insurance companies, and giving money to families who overpaid for housing they could not afford. Now the government is taxing poor and middle class people who earn their own living but cannot afford to pay for their own health care insurance because they are saddled with paying down student loan debt. At some point, it seems to me that American citizens have a right to shout that enough is enough. I think that time has come.
They need to be looking at WHY students have such ridiculous loans.
Because I don't feel that I was given the proper explanation of all things financial aid like I should have been in high school. But more importantly, look at the public colleges and how they keep raising tuition. I go to the University of Memphis and they've raised tuition twice in the last 2-3 years. I go online and have to pay a $600 fee for the campus... that I don't set foot on. It costs $1000 a class for me. The interest rate is also ridiculous.
There is nothing fundamentally different about student loans that make them different from any other loan and no reason for the bankruptcy laws to be applied the same. Further if the loans are not discharchable then why is there interest on the debt? The interest is to cover risk and as the law now stands there is no risk. Government is supposed to be non profit so why the interest? And why the interest on the interest since this can cause the debt to accelerate beyound the capacity to repay ever.
A cynical person would say that the education system is being setup to deny success to the poor, and working class. To make sure that even if you do succeed you won't succeed.
There is a solution to the problem that too many in America are not ready to wrap their heads around yet, UNIVERSAL EDUCATION. We are perfectly capable of educating everyone in this country who is capable and willing to be educated. We should at the very least provide for the best brightest to become doctors and engineers.
Borrowing money to get a degree is like spending $100 weatherizing a house to save $25 in elec costs ....
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the reason you could no longer discharge student loan debt through bankruptcy was because one too many people with student loands did that throughout the eighties.
What are the facts on this?
One thing I would agree to, and that would be allowing people some latitude to be able to write off on your income taxes the student loan interest. Anything else is just plain wrong.
I for one have paid my loans off years ago. It wasn't fun, or easy. But I did it.
One thing I can mention is there are other alternatives, many others like me have served in the military to earn extra income for schooling. Those funds are still out there. So if you want to make life easier, or a chance at making your future a little brighter, once again try working for it. Otherwise claiming bankruptcy is just another form of asking society "AKA the government" which is nothing more than you and me, to pay your way!
Pull yourself up by your boot straps, and BE RESPONSIBLE to carry your own weight.
Don't forget that you took the money, now it's time to pay back the debt you incurred. Remember that no one forced you to go to school. And no one ever forced you to take the money.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
A Fidelity study found that adult kids and their folks aren't on the same page when it comes to discussing finances.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'