Smart SpendingSmart Spending

Pay for online news? No way

A large majority of Americans are unwilling to pay anything at all for online content from daily newspapers.

By MSN Money Partner May 3, 2011 7:01PM

This post comes from partner site ConsumerAffairs.com.

 

Newspapers and other traditional media outlets have spent a lot of time and money trying to figure out how to charge their online readers, who are often getting a free ride when they read news online.

 

But the latest Adweek/Harris poll shows that a large majority of Americans -- 80% -- say they are willing to pay exactly "nothing" to read a daily newspaper online.

 

Some would pay, but not very much: 14% said they would pay between $1 and $10 per month, while very few said they would be willing to pay between $11 and $20 (4%) or more than $20 per month (2%).

The New York Times recently put up a paywall, charging online readers who view more than 20 articles per month. The Wall Street Journal and Financial Times also charge for online content. Post continues after video.

But while online paywalls are becoming more common, fewer people said they would be willing to pay to read content online than said so (23%) in late 2009.

 

Other findings of the poll include:

  • Younger adults are more likely to pay for a daily newspaper's online content. Just over a quarter of those between 18 and 34 said they would, compared with between 15% and 18% of other age groups.
  • 25% of men said they would pay, while only 15% of women said they would.
  • The more education a person has, the more likely he or she is willing to pay to read a daily newspaper's content online: 28% of college graduates, 19% of people who have attended some college, and 15% of those who have not attended any college at all.

More on ConsumerAffairs.com and MSN Money:

1Comment
May 14, 2011 11:18AM
avatar
My local newspaper put up a paywall. The thing is, the people who pay for it don't just get content; they're treated to full-page pop-up ads and pictures of used cars splashed across the background, plus ads on the side and in the middle of every article. We refuse to give them money to sell us things, but they're pretty much the only source for local news in town. So during the last primaries we couldn't find any information about the candidates because they had a monopoly on interviews and news. And if there are important things we should know, like what the school district is up to or how our bills will increase from a new tax, we have to glean it from headlines or the comment sections. It's outrageous.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.

Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.

ABOUT SMART SPENDING

Smart Spending brings you the best money-saving tips from MSN Money and the rest of the Web. Join the conversation on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Editor Bev O'Shea lives and works in the foothills of the Appalachians. A former copy editor for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the Orlando Sentinel, she joined MSN Money in 2007. She's a fan of sunsets, college football and free shipping, among other things.

Having worked as a writer, reporter and editor for more than 25 years, Editor Julie Tilsner is the sort of person who can't help but correct grammar in Facebook postings and on billboards. She's written for BusinessWeek, the Los Angeles Times, Parenting, Redbook, AOL and others. She lives in Los Angeles County with her family and loves to drink wine and practice yoga, although not generally at the same time.

A writer for MSN Money since January 2007, Donna Freedman won regional and national prizes during an 18-year newspaper career and earned a college degree in midlife without taking out student loans. She also writes about smart money tactics for magazines and on her own site, Surviving and Thriving.

Mitch Lipka has been warning people about scams and shining light on questionable business practices for more than 20 years. Mitch, the consumer columnist for The Boston Globe, has also been a reporter and editor at The Philadelphia Inquirer, Consumer Reports, South Florida Sun-Sentinel and AOL. He won the 2010 New York Press Club award for best consumer reporting online and was honored in 2011 for his reporting on child product safety.

Marilyn Lewis is an award-winning writer with a passion for getting readers clear, straight information that helps them stay out of financial trouble. A former reporter for The San Jose Mercury News, she works from her home in Port Townsend, Wash. Contact her at MarilynLewis@Outlook.com.

LATEST BLOG POSTS

Report: Hazards higher for poor kids

Children from lower income families are at greater risk of suffering accidental injuries and being sickened by food, according to a Consumer Federation of America study.

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

TOOLS

More
MSN Mobile: Go to msn.com in your phone's browser.