Bank error in man's favor: $110,000
Here's what you're not supposed to do when someone else's money winds up in your account.
A Laguna Beach, Calif., man was arrested after he allegedly spent more than half of a $110,000 tax refund that wasn't his but was deposited into his bank account.
Oh, my. Can we learn some personal-finance lessons from this? (Tip o' the hat to Washington Post PF columnist Michelle Singletary for alerting her many readers, including us, about this teachable moment.)
Technically it wasn't the bank's mistake. The 67-year-old Los Angeles woman who was owed the refund in 2010 gave the IRS a number for a bank account she had closed in 2004. That account was later assigned to Stephen Reginald McDow, 34, authorities said. The Orange County Register tells the rest of the story:
The error was discovered months later and McDow was asked to return the money to the rightful owner. Prosecutors say he wrote to the victim's attorney in March saying he had spent most of it.
Prosecutors said he used about $60,000 to pay student and car loans and to save a house he owns from foreclosure.
Some news accounts said McDow offered to make monthly payments, but the woman wasn't satisfied with his plan and filed a police report.
McDow now faces a felony charge of theft of lost property and up to four years in prison if convicted. What can we learn from this?
- You have to pay close attention to detail, particularly when large sums of money are involved. The woman electronically filed her 2009 tax return in August 2010, but even with an apparent extension didn't take the time to verify the account information. Make sure you give the IRS correct and current account and routing numbers for direct deposit of your refund.
- You've got to follow up.According to Accounting Today, the woman asked her accountant to check on the status of the refund in December. The IRS provides a website for taxpayers to monitor the status of their refund. Use it. (It's unclear how much that would have helped in this case, as prosecutors allege McDow began paying bills with the money a day after it arrived in his account in September.)
- The IRS doesn't care if you mess up. It's your job to work this out. "The agency says it assumes no responsibility for taxpayer error," Singletary wrote.
- Apparently the bank didn't either. Citibank apparently didn't notice that the names or other information it was provided with the deposit didn't match. Post continues after video.
No one should assume a mysterious large deposit in one's bank account won't be noticed eventually by someone else. Only in the game of Monopoly is a bank error in your favor yours to keep.
Singletary asked her readers what they would do if this had happened to them. There is no wiggle room, in her opinion:
Me, I wouldn't spend a penny until I had double- and tripled-checked that the money was mine. It's just never worth it to do the wrong thing even if you're in financial straits. It's like when people get more money back from a cashier and never say a word. I believe you will get a payback in kind eventually.
The only positive lesson here is that a windfall can be put to great use by paying off debt, rather than blowing it all on frivolous expenditures. Just make sure you've obtained it legally.
More on MSN Money:
I think something everyone is over looking but is not at all relevant to the article...
WHO THE HELL GETS A $110,000.00 TAX RETURN???
Ok here's my two cents (wish it was 110k but hey). This guy offered to repay her, she just didn't like his terms. Some of you want him crucified. Sure he should have questioned the deposit. By the same token her and her accountant should have checked their numbers, isn't that why you have accountants? numbers? But this woman is ruining this mans life because she loves money more than fairness. Like I said he should have questioned it but again HE OFFERED RESTITUTION. So to say he should swing (which is what some of you are implying) It seems like you only read the parts that you wanted.
I don't give a damn if you give me the big thumbs down or not. He's obviously a college grad. He repaid student loans and saved his house from foreclosure. If she's a business owner, I'd hate to work for her. This whole thing is because she didn't "like his terms of repayment" Such B.S. This woman is a wench.
Here's a lesson for everyone with a grudge. If you don't like someone, just go deposit some money in their bank account for them THEN TURN THEM IN FOR THEFT! Seriously? How do you even begin to approach the police with that one "Excuse me office, I deposited some money in this mans account, now he won't give it back all at once.....arrest him!
From a legal standpoint, I don't think he did anything wrong. Maybe the bank or the lady, but not him. From a moral standpoint......dudes goin to hell.
This should be handled in civil court, certainly not with criminal proceedings.
Seriously! Dude was all types of wrong.
I would say...hey citizen get this money out of my account now.
I did not earn it. I did not win it and I damn sure don't want to try to pay this crap back if it does not belong to me! Sincerely got enough problems!
The women should fire her accountant .
I think many people are not looking at the bigger picture. Yes the lady accidently gave the wrong bank account number and in return HER money was deposited into this mans account. Everyone makes mistakes no matter what and one number can throw everything completely off. But this used to be one of her old accounts and unfortunately the bank reused this account number and assigned it to someone else (which is stupid to be honest). We shouldnt be saying that the lady shouldnt get her money back because she made a mistake by giving the wrong number. In the end its her money and who really cares what she is doing to get 110,000.00 refund its none of our business. The man should have known that if 110,000 just shows up in you account to call your bank and see whats going on. You just dont go spending 60,000 paying off bills etc....like nothing. He knew he was wrong. Money in that large amount just doesnt come out of no where. and while yes he did offer to pay her back to be honest if it says he had to pay bills and his house is in foreclosuer...what really makes you think he was going to be paying a big monthly payment each month to pay back the 60,000 he used. If he said he could only pay a 100.00 a month that would take nearly 50 years to pay it back in full. Even if he said he could pay 500.00 to 1000.00 a year that would still take 5 to 10 years to pay off.
I dont see why everyone says she is going to ruin his life, make him lose his home, etc....Apparently his life was already bad to begin with before he even got the money he already spent 60,000 to get him out of debt. I just think if the shoe was on the other foot....you would be pissed if YOUR money no matter how much it was it could be 1000.00, 5000.00 or even 1 million was put into another account, you would be upset that someone spent it knowing it was not theirs.
Yes it was her fault for not double checking but again mistakes do happen. But in the end its not like she freely gave him money and is now taking it back...its hers and belongs to her no matter how much money she makes or has without that tax refund.
Any time Citibank is involved, people's lives are going to get ruined. It's a basic process to confirm that the name on the check matches the name on the account. If it doesn't, the deposit cannot happen. Period. This is especially the case with deposits this large.
Every bank teller with a high school degree knows this. But somehow Citi's IT system for processing deposits doesn't do this comparison? It's criminal negligence.
Clearly he shouldn't have spent the money, but now the guy's life is ruined. All would have been prevented if a multi-billion dollar company knew how to do a basic comparison.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
CardRatings.com's annual survey of people's credit-worthiness show that residents of states that were least affected by the recession are faring the best still.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'