Smart SpendingSmart Spending

It's (still) a wonderful life: A remake

Today's version of that wonderful holiday classic wouldn't turn out quite the same way.

By MSN Money Partner Dec 9, 2011 2:34PM

This post comes from Richard Barrington at partner site MoneyRates.

 

MoneyRates.com on MSN MoneyThe 1946 film classic "It's A Wonderful Life" is so heartwarming you could almost forget it's about banking. Central to the story, though, is the Bailey Building and Loan Association. So with remakes being so popular in Hollywood, and with banks being so much in the news this year, it begs the question: Could this film be adapted for today's banking environment?

 

Here are a few tweaks to the original story line that could make it work. Post continues below.

The setup:

  • In the original, George Bailey reluctantly forgoes college so he can step into his newly deceased father's shoes running the Bailey Building & Loan. He makes this sacrifice in part because he wants to carry on his father's legacy of making loans to the working poor.
  • In the remake, you'd have to acknowledge that someone without a college education these days would have trouble getting a job managing a Wendy's, let alone a bank. So push George's age up a few years and give him an MBA. However, still a man of the people, he refuses to accept a penny more than $1 million a year in compensation.

The villain:

  • In the original, the antagonist is the evil Henry Potter, a slumlord and chief shareholder in the bank who wants to change its community-friendly policies.
  • In the remake, Potter calls himself a real-estate developer rather than a slumlord. Bitter townspeople, however, refer to him as a "one percenter."

Bailey Park:

  • In the original, George Bailey creates Bailey Park, an affordable housing development intended to give people an alternative to Potter's overpriced rents.
  • In the remake, Potter has spent years selling balloon mortgages to ignorant townspeople, who were willing to sign anything in hopes of flipping their houses for a tidy profit a few years later. When this goes awry, Bailey is the only banker willing to refinance those mortgages at today's lower interest rates.

The run on the bank:

  • In the original, a key plot development is the run on the bank, which creates an immediate need for cash.
  • In the remake, thanks to FDIC insurance, a run on the bank is less likely. However, because the Glass-Steagall Act has been repealed since the original was made, banks now have much more exotic ways of getting into trouble. Today, the emergency could be a margin call on the bank's investment in distressed Greek debt.

Uncle Billy:

  • In the original, they never spelled out exactly what was wrong with Uncle Billy. The point is that he's forgetful, though in George Bailey's dark vision of what the town would be like if he weren't around, Uncle Billy ends up in a mental institution. Of course, the real question is what's wrong with George Bailey: Why would he entrust the $8,000 in cash that's essential to the bank's survival to Uncle Billy anyway?
  • In the remake, you wouldn't want to miss the opportunity for some further character development. Uncle Billy could be a rogue trader with a substance abuse problem.

The townspeople gathering:

  • In the original, the townspeople gather at George Bailey's house in the moment of crisis to show support and sing holiday carols.
  • In the remake, the Occupy Bedford Falls movement descends on the Bailey family.

The ending:

  • In the original, the bank is saved by contributions from ordinary townspeople.
  • In the remake, it's pretty much the same thing: government bailout, funded by taxpayers.

The closing line:

  • In the original, little Zuzu Bailey hears a bell on the Christmas tree ring, and exclaims that it means an angel has just gotten its wings.
  • In the remake, Zuzu's iPhone rings. It's alerting her to a tweet from Clarence about his new wings, because now there's an app for that.

You see, with just a few small twists, the story still works. After all, this may be a much less innocent time than 1946, but it's still a wonderful life.

 

More on MoneyRates and MSN Money:

4Comments
Dec 12, 2011 1:14PM
avatar

Journalism -

 

In the original - Bedford Falls' journalists exhibited professionalism, checked their sources, treated people with respect

 

In the remake - "journalists" (like many employed by MSN) print anything that pops into thier tiny mind, care little about the validity of their statements, believe that "news" is babbling about how some celebrity did this, or did that, or report in detail what a Kardashian ate for breakfast.

 

Comedians-

 

In the original - Bedford Falls comedians were actually funny

 

In the remake -  Comedy is a humourous wasteland (See above article).

 

 

Dec 11, 2011 3:39PM
avatar

I grew up in a town like that in western New York.   The people were real as were their honest decency.   As time went by large, out of town corporations, like Wal*Mart came in and destroyed the entire main street.   Now there is nothing but the Wart*Mall.  I have many happy memories of the local citizens who were neighbors and who used to own the small businesses there.  They were wonderful people and it was a wonderful life.

 

Big box stores really, really do destroy our American culture.  We have made a gigantic mistake in always looking for the best deal instead of what was good for our communities.  That hometown style of business will never return.   And places like Wart*Mall take all the profits out of the town and, therefore, do not invest anything in the town...so it decays.

 

If you want help improve our country try and resist the temptation to shop at these corporate stores and spend a little more to shop locally.   If just twenty percent of us started doing this it would make a difference.

Dec 9, 2011 2:46PM
avatar
I would like to see a remake, just to see if turned out any better.
Dec 9, 2011 3:55PM
avatar
This is already one of the most overused plot devices in fiction.  Why to we need a remake?
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

ABOUT SMART SPENDING

Smart Spending brings you the best money-saving tips from MSN Money and the rest of the Web. Join the conversation on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

LATEST BLOG POSTS

Can you trust Carfax?

If you're thinking about buying a car and the Carfax report comes back clean, you're good to go, right? Um, maybe not. Here are four other ways you can avoid buying a clunker.

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

TOOLS

More