Smart SpendingSmart Spending

Is a 3.6% Social Security bump enough?

The first Social Security increase since 2009 means an average raise of $39 a month for retirees. What will $39 buy?

By MSN Money Partner Oct 19, 2011 7:11PM

This post comes from Giselle Smith at MSN Money.

 

Could you live better on $39 more a month?

 

That's the average increase predicted for retirees in 2012 thanks to a cost-of-living adjustment announced today by the Social Security Administration. Though happy for the 3.6% increase -- which amounts to an average annual bump of a little less than $500 -- many seniors aren't counting the extra dollars just yet.

 

The first COLA in Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits since 2009 impacts 55 million people getting Social Security, and more than 8 million on SSI, who will receive an average increase of $18 a month.

 

However, Medicare is expected to announce next week the 2012 cost of Part B premiums -- which cover doctor visits and outpatient services, and are deducted from most beneficiaries' Social Security checks. The predicted increase in premiums could take a bite out of the COLA increase.

 

Will the net result be enough to make a difference? Many say no.

 

"My costs this year alone jumped 6%. Somebody is 'cooking the books.' COLA supposed to go hand in hand with inflation," commented one reader on MSNBC.

 

"This pay increase of $40/mo won't even put me back where I was two years ago," wrote another. Post continues after video.

"Seniors have basically been in a standstill for two full years, and some of that breathing room is going to be wiped out by the fact that premiums are going up," says Cathy Weatherford, CEO of the Insured Retirement Institute, a trade association for providers of annuities, insurance and financial planning, MSNBC reported.  

 

Many advocates and seniors say the COLA is not enough to offset the rising cost of necessities such as food, utilities, and health care.

 

"Unfortunately, the increase announced today will not completely ease their burden," said Nancy LeaMond, executive vice president with AARP, according to The Hill. "Medicare premiums are also expected to rise for many. And with the decline in housing values, deep losses to retirement and savings accounts and skyrocketing health and prescription drug costs, millions of older Americans continue to struggle to make ends meet."

 

Nancy Altman, co-director of Strengthen Social Security, said out-of-pocket health care costs rose 14.1% for seniors and people with disabilities in the past two years, according to The Associated Press.

 

Many retirees rely on Social Security for the majority -- sometimes as much as 90% -- of their income, according to the Social Security Administration. Retirees also spend their income differently from working taxpayers.

 

As the AP reported:

"The COLA index is based on average price of goods and services as consumed by workers, not by retired people," says Polina Vlasenko, an American Institute for Economic Research fellow. "Retirees tend to spend more on health care and goods and services, and those prices increase faster than the national average. So COLA may not fully compensate for what that they spend their money on."

Doing the math

The amount of the COLA is determined by a formula specified by the Social Security Act. COLAs are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), which are calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. If the CPI-W stays flat, or decreases, there is no COLA, but Social Security and SSI benefits stay the same.

 

Since COLAs began in 1975, the only years when inflation was too low to warrant an increase have been 2010 and 2011 -- after a 5.8% jump in 2009.

Senior advocacy groups, including AARP, argue that the CPI-W is not an appropriate measure of inflation for older adults, because it doesn't reflect the actual costs of goods they purchase, including a much larger portion of income on medical care.

 

But changing the formula, as some propose to do, could make things worse. CNN reported:

Going forward, Social Security beneficiaries may not see such generous COLA increases. As part of the debt reduction talks, lawmakers are looking at changing the formula upon which the annual increase in based, said David Certner, AARP's legislative policy director. This could lower the COLA increase by several tenths of a percentage point, which may not sound like much but adds up over time, he said.

For 2012, is 3.6% a reasonable increase?

 

More on MSN Money:

26Comments
Oct 20, 2011 11:00AM
avatar
First I want to make it clear. Social Security is good and important for most americans. It, however, was never intended to be your sole income in retirement. I don't know about others but the last 5 years I worked I received less that 1% per year in pay increases while being required to pay more for insurance. All My working live I have saved for the day I can retire. I Have watched others buy cars they did not need, to impress others. They buy houses they can't afford. they spend with no thought of their future.  Now that I am retired and not yet 62,  I have a reasonable amount of money to live on.  When Social Security is available to me it will help pay the necessities of life and make me a little more comfortable.  Had I bought new houses in my fifties and new cars every 3 years I would be in trouble now.  Calculations for COLA  should be on the necessities of life and not continue to include purchased housing cost. It is not fair for taxpayers to be on the hook for your irresponsible behavior.  I know some of you will say some people were poor all their life and could not save. I don't buy that. Most of those people made choices that created their problem. Smoking alone, if stopped, would fund a nice retirement fund.  Eating fast food instead of cooking not only hurts your health but cost more.  It is all about choices you made and should accept responsibility for.
Oct 20, 2011 1:14PM
avatar
3.6% is a joke!!  Anybody been to the grocery store or bought gas in the last 2 years??? The increase should be at least 10-12%!!!!!
Oct 20, 2011 2:45PM
avatar
This country cannot, I mean cannot afford to take care of the seniors when he has made it's own obligation to take care of the world with "our tax payer dollars"  in foreign aid.  Our congress needs to take care of it's own and screw the rest of the world until things are good here at home!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oct 20, 2011 2:21PM
avatar
WHY CAN'T THE POLITICIANS TAKE A CUT IN THEIR WORTHLESS PAY TO BUMP UP THE SOCIAL SECURITY THEY HAVE BEEN STEALING FOR YEARS?  THIS RAISE WONT  EVEN COVER MY UTILITIES.
Oct 20, 2011 2:29PM
avatar

I haven't seen a raise in 5 years and my health insurance premiums go up every year and the coverage goes down doesn't seem to matter I guess if your retired or not its all going downhill

avatar

LBJ -- The Democratic President pushed Congress to pass a law that placed all tax money collected for use with Social Security to be placed in the General Tax Funds..... THIS IS WHERE IT ALL BEGAN...The so called "Great Society"...UNDER THE DEMOCRATICALLY CONTROLLED CONGRESS... . appears to be coming apart at the seems... all succeeding Congresses have "kicked the can down the road" and basically not raised taxes to cover 'THEIR' spending projects but rather left an IOU in the SS Fund...sad and probably unethical..SmileAngry Crying

Oct 20, 2011 11:36AM
avatar

The Federal Gov't. is disgraceful.  Bend over seniors,  the Obama government is coming to help you.  They are unwilling to give seniors a legitimate cost of living increase but they sure have money to throw to the people who donate to their campaigns (Solindra $530 mil.) and their union  buddies ($30+ billion) to re-hire public employees that municipalities can't afford. 

According to VP Joe Biden if Obama doesn't get the money, store owners will get shot in the head and  women will get raped.     I think there should  be a cartoon made with Joe B. as the main character.  "Joe" was supposed to watch and make sure the tarp money was spent correctly and he was so busy talking he totally failed that job.  There was supposed to be billions for road and bridge repair which was frittered away on other things.  Now "Joe" and Obama want more money to fix roads and bridges.  I don't think so. 

Oct 20, 2011 1:27PM
avatar
Well, I guess 3.6% is better than the 0% increase for the last two years.  It should have been at least a 3% increase for each of those years though, despite the Feds "BS" about there being no inflation back then! Eye-rolling
Oct 20, 2011 2:03PM
avatar

yes 3.6 is better than zero, but if you realize anything from the increase, with the change in your deduction for medicare , then it will be a lot less than 3.6, probably zero so it looks like we stay about the same  as we are this year, except groceries, gas, taxes

and insurance are going up again, good luck seniors you will need to keep your head above water.

Oct 20, 2011 6:41PM
avatar

Congress has kept on changing the COLA formula to keep costs down rather than coming up with something fair that really represents the costs for seniors.

 

I did my best to save as much as possible in my 401K plans but my employers quit putting in their share, several economic bubbles have driven down the value of my investments and inflation has taken out a big chunk of what I have available for my retirement.  Most of my former employers were taken over and I am left with a couple of small annuities that will always remain small.  How could I have planned for all that to happen to me?

 

Social Security is the main source of my retirement income.  Now that my savings and investments have shrunk, I will have to start withdrawing from my 401K and IRA funds when they are at their lowest point..

 

What I will end up with when I get older is enough to buy one bullet for one cheap handgun, thank you NRA, to end it all.  Some how I thought the American Dream would end in a better way. 

Oct 20, 2011 4:18PM
avatar

 The uninformed are still standing up for Obama  and still singing "Bushs Fault".

 

   ========

 

   ........Well, this is for the truly UNINFORMED, the annual COLA is not set by the President, whether it be Obama, Bush, or Thomas Jefferson.  The COLA is determined by law, which was crafted by Congress in the '70s.  The law determines the COLA for each year, and only Congress can change the law.  If you are going to throw rocks at someone over this, at least select the correct target.  PS, I agree that the formula set by Congress is complete FUBAR, for it seems to totally ignore the rising costs of health care, food, and energy.  AARP has a good TV add about SS, ending up telling Congress that there are 15 million seniors waiting to vote in 2012, it wouldn't hurt to send them an email before that just to keep them aware of your feelings and your right to vote!

 

   ...Stromprophet, increasing the full retirement age and increasing the income cap should be sufficient, there should be no need to cut benefits already earned.

Oct 20, 2011 3:05PM
avatar

We do have a way to show congress and the president how displeased that we are with this  COLA.  

FLOOD THE WHITEHOUSE WITH EMAILS & FLOOD YOUR CONGRESSMAN WITH EMAILS.

 

THEN, VOTE THEM ALL OUT IN 2012

Oct 20, 2011 8:39PM
avatar

Everyone should read the report by USA Today on what the govt pays out in federal pensions compared to what it pays out to SS.FOOOOOkin amazing how much those people are paid in

pensions. Plus they put in NOTHING of their own ,It all comes from taxes.

Oct 21, 2011 5:46AM
avatar

Trouble with both

concervatives and liberals is they are both reactionaties. Reactionaries want to go back to the way things were. Liberals want to continue spending other people's money by borrowing or taxing. Concervatives want spend less like we used to.

You can never go back in history. We need progressives in the White House and in congress who will remove the present government restraints on all American  industry. New energy sources, new gas lines under ground that won't blow us whole neighborhoods, a change to natural gas run cars an American energy source thatese changes and much more will put several million people to work in private jobs . That will give the tax money we need also We need elected officials willingh and able to solve our nation's problems instead of only thinking 'how can I get re-elected'.

Oct 20, 2011 3:53PM
avatar

PLEASE this is a serious matter that will effect all for the rest of our lives. If you don't get involved you will reap the rewards latter..... Emails to congessman and Whitehouse  . Thanks sharriannie for your post!!..

 

Oct 20, 2011 2:51PM
avatar
How was the inflation figure of 1.0% computed? The cost of everything needed for living has went up several percentage points in the last two years and that wont stop with this cola increase.
Oct 20, 2011 4:06PM
avatar
Unfortunately, they have to stem the tide of SS as the populace gets older. Either by pushing the SS age higher, reducing payments, or raising taxes. Probably a combination of all 3.
Oct 20, 2011 2:32PM
avatar
I can reply for the poor. I have tried to get a college education 7 different times. But because of rising college admissions and books, especially books, I have had to stop going to college. Try going to college with wages of a dishwasher or an award winning chef that couldn't get hired to make make more than $11.00 an hour. Try to save money to get through college will not happen. Working sometimes 2 full time jobs and going to school was still an impossibility. That was eating at the restaurant I worked for. With Rent and utilities without any health insurance was the down fall. The service industry doesn't provide insurance. Choice some say. I think they have had it easy. You don't get choices when you are that poor.
Oct 21, 2011 8:57AM
avatar
Soth Side - you are totally in error, or just lying to build hate toward government employees?  All federal employees are required to contribute a certain percentage of their gross income toward their retirement.  And, the federal governments retirement system was totally revamped in the mid 1980's.  It is now comprised of a very conservative pension (which they contribute toward), and the Thrift Savings Plan (comparable to private sector 401k's).  However, many state and local municipal employees contribute nothing - depends on the state or local government as it varies. 
Oct 21, 2011 5:58PM
avatar
I don't kow where Robert B got his information but the monies paid into the Social Security Trust fund have never been put into the general fund since its inception in 1939.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

ABOUT SMART SPENDING

Smart Spending brings you the best money-saving tips from MSN Money and the rest of the Web. Join the conversation on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

TOOLS

More