Obese? You may pay more for insurance
Some employers are ignoring the law and sticking employees who have unfavorable health scores with higher premiums.
This post comes from Jen Wieczner at partner site MarketWatch.
But as companies struggle to curb rising health care costs, they are increasingly pointing a finger at workers' ballooning bellies. Obesity-related health problems account for a big chunk of medical claims, insurance experts say, leading some executives to believe the best way to trim their budgets is to get workers to trim their own fat first.
"There's a lot of concern around how obesity should be dealt with in the corporate setting," says Michael Wood, a senior health management consultant at human resources firm Towers Watson.
For the past few years, companies have experimented with tying health insurance premiums to people's health. Here's how it works: Employees go through medical and biometric testing as part of their health insurance open-enrollment process. They are weighed, their height and blood pressure are measured, and their blood is drawn. Those with high scores on cholesterol, glucose and blood pressure -- or with chronic conditions like diabetes -- are told they will have to pay higher premiums unless they actively try to address any risky conditions.
The premiums can also be tied directly to one's body mass index (those with scores over 25 are rated overweight; 30 and above is considered obese). Some companies hike rates even for those with a BMI as low as 27, Wood says. An online tool on HealthInsurancePlus.com, for one, allows consumers to estimate their BMI and premiums by plugging in their height and weight. Expect to see a 25% increase in premiums for BMI scores greater than 30 or 31 in major health insurers' plans; someone with a BMI over 39 might pay 50% more a month, according to the site.
A separate report by eHealthInsurance, an online health plan marketplace, found that individual insurance policyholders in the obese category paid 22% more in monthly premiums, on average, compared with those with "healthy" weight (obese men paid 29% more).
But since body mass index is the rough equivalent of a fat score, some critics say forcing employees to pay fees for being fat is too personal and unfair. While companies are legally allowed to raise premiums on employees who are obese or have other chronic conditions only if they provide a way to duck the charge through treatment or participation in Weight Watchers or disease management programs, some employers are being more strict -- requiring employees to shave off BMI points by dropping pounds before they'll waive the surcharges, says Wood.
Some are ignoring the law altogether and simply sticking employees who have unfavorable health scores with higher premiums. "The return on healthier folks is worth the risk of somebody trying to sue them for discrimination," Wood says.
To be sure, a few extra pounds isn't necessarily a bad thing. A new study of BMI and mortality by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that individuals rated overweight, with a BMI of 25 to 30, had a 6% lower risk of death than those in the "healthy" category. But individuals considered obese, with a BMI of 30 or above, had an 18% higher death risk -- and becomes greater as weight increases.
Making smokers pay extra is more widely accepted than penalizing workers for relative fatness, says Wood -- and perhaps with good reason. Smokers have a higher success rate with quitting than obese people have with getting back to normal weight. Plus, he adds, smoking seems more like a choice than being heavy. "You don't have to smoke to live; you have to eat to live," Wood says.
More from MarketWatch and MSN Money:
- Is your ergonomic desk trying to kill you?
- The doctor is now following you on Twitter
- More students delay repaying loans
- Will Obamacare force more smokers to quit?
- Smoking lounges disappearing from US airports
- Her health insurance costs $900 a month
Food Stamps are one of the most abused and wasteful social program this country has ever developed. A family of four receives more money monthly then my family of five spends a month on food. The amount paid out each month should be cut by at least one third. Here is how those on food stamps would not go hungry or be malnourished because of this change. Purchases by food stamps should be restricted to the following: Fresh/frozen non prepared meats & fish, fresh/frozen non prepared vegetables, deli meats/cheeses, canned goods, breads, non sweetened dairy, and juices. The following would be banned from being purchased by food stamps: Soda, bottled water, power and energy drinks, coffee, tea, ice cream, candy, energy bars, any pre-prepared meals or sandwiches, snacks/junk food, pet food, cigarettes and alcohol.
Obamacare is charging smokers $4000 - $5000 a year in penalty tax. I'm sure the overweight crowd is next. Get ready folks.
This is Just the beginning.
We're about to find out just how FREE "Free" healthcare is.
If you have lots of speeding tickets, you're a higher risk, so you pay higher car insurance. If you're fat, or smoke, or have other unhealthy habits, you are a higher risk, and you should sure as hell pay more than those of us who take care of ourselves.
I have said for years that the companies that provided "Preventative Health and Wellness Programs" were just gathering information, on your personal medical information, to use against you.
I see blood draws coming, to see what your DNA holds against you. Then they will determine what your health coverage will cost.
Genetic testing will be next. If you don't know what that is, look it up.
You wanted socialism from Odumass now live with your mistake
I dont want or need your dam healthcare system its all a scam.
Welcome to the new World order
There should be no stipulations on life style, thats profiling! Typical say one thing do another liberalism! Or just make it up as we go that seems to work for you.
It was bound to happen - first the smokers were villainized and penalized, because it was socially acceptable. Now, that smokers are dwindling, a new target must be picked, and honestly, why not the overweight? Complications of obesity, and conditions caused or worsened by obesity, cost a fortune to treat. Despite Mr. Wood's assertion, obesity is a "lifestyle" choice like smoking in many cases and can be "cured" with knowledge and hard work, just like smokers can choose not to smoke.
Let me get this straight. A man can have sex with another man, we know the consequences, and its okay. BUT a smoker, we know the consequences, has to pay more? Maybe we need to classify smaokers as a minority.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
ABOUT SMART SPENDING
LATEST BLOG POSTS
Tired of your wallet taking a beating at the grocery store? Here are some creative ways to save big on food costs.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
BLOGS WE LIKE
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'