Smart SpendingSmart Spending

Is US income gap wider than you think?

A study by behavioral economists suggests that most Americans would prefer a more equitable distribution.

By Karen Datko Aug 13, 2012 6:23PM

Image: CEO (© Roy McMahon/Corbis)Do Americans understand how vast the nation's wealth gap is? And if they had their way, what income distribution sounds just about right to most people? That's what two behavioral economists have attempted to find out.

 

On both counts, the results they got may surprise you.

 

First, we Americans recognize that there's an income gap but greatly underestimate how much wealth is concentrated in the top fifth of the population.

 

"If you guessed around 9% for the bottom (40% of the population) and 59% for the top (20%), you're pretty much in line with the average response we got when we asked this question of thousands of Americans," Duke professor Dan Ariely wrote in The Atlantic this month.

 

In reality, the bottom 40% of the population has only 0.3% of the wealth, and the top 20% has 84%, he writes. (Post continues below.)

How does that compare with the wealth distribution people would like to see? Ariely and fellow researcher Michael Norton of Harvard tested that two ways.

 

They asked 5,522 Americans to describe a distribution of wealth in which they'd be comfortable being randomly assigned anywhere between the bottom and top. 

 

What a bunch of fair-minded people we are. Ariely wrote:

We found that the ideal distribution described by this representative sample of Americans was dramatically more equal than exists anywhere in the world, with 32% of wealth belonging to the wealthiest quintile down to 11% by the poorest.
What was particularly surprising about the results was that when we examined the ideal distributions for Republicans and Democrats, we found them to be quite similar.

They also asked subjects to pick between two unidentified countries -- one modeled on the U.S. reality and the other somewhat similar to Sweden. The second one was chosen by 92%, with, once again, a small difference between those who identified with either major party -- 93% for Democrats and 90.5% for Republicans.

The difference between rich and poor respondents to the question was also small, Ariely told NPR.

 

What can we learn from this? Ariely wrote:

The first is that we vastly underestimate the level of inequality that we have in America. Our society is far more uneven in terms of wealth than we believe it is. Second, we want much more equality than both what we have and what we think we have. Apparently, when asked in a way that avoids hot-button terms, misconceptions, and the level of wealth people currently possess, Americans are actually in agreement about wanting a more equal distribution of wealth.

Want a graphic illustration of where the U.S. sits? Another Atlantic article includes two maps identifying countries by how they fit on the Gini coefficient, a respected method for measuring income inequality. The article says:

Income inequality is more severe in the U.S. than it is in nearly all of West Africa, North Africa, Europe, and Asia. We're on par with some of the world's most troubled countries, and not far from the perpetual conflict zones of Latin American and Sub-Saharan Africa.

More on MSN Money:

11Comments
Aug 13, 2012 9:30PM
avatar
A poor man wants to be rich, a rich man wants to be king, and a king ain't satisfied 'til he rules everything.

I think that's from a Bruce Springsteen song.

At least in the survey people showed some common sense and heart.  The income gap in this country is shameful and ultimately harmful.
Aug 14, 2012 5:54PM
avatar
Sure, everyone has the theoretical ability to become rich, even here. Where I draw the line is when those riches come at the expense of someone else's opportunity. When riches are the byproduct not of one's own efforts but from work Daddy or Granddaddy did, enjoy it to the hilt but don't call yourself "self-made", and don't expect a greater tax break for them or for dividends (i.e. money-for-nothing) than that given for wages earned through actual work whether blue or white collar. Don't expect to sell products made with foreign slave labor at American prices and be honored for it, especially when most of those products are junk by, very often, your own design. And for God's sake cut it out with that "job creator" crap unless there's a long-term living wage behind it - for people HERE.
Aug 14, 2012 3:19AM
avatar
Income inequality will always exist in a free enterprise capitalistic society. Alowing the government to pass legislation that inhibits the growth of capitalism and the free enterprise system insures that only those in power (the government) and those now in possession of wealth will ever have it.
Aug 14, 2012 10:28AM
avatar

But the top 1 % are job creators aren't they?  Think of all the butlers, groundskeepers, and yacht captains who would be unemployed without them.

 

And William Stuart (poloplayer), if you read the article you'd see that the bottom 40% control 0.3 % of the countries wealth, how much of that should they pay in federal taxes?

 

Keep in mind they may not pay income tax but that's because they make next to nothing.  They don't get out of paying the federal gas tax, unless they don't drive.

 

Aug 14, 2012 7:23AM
avatar
and , in reality, the bottom 40% pay no federal taxes and many in the bottom 40% receive some form of government handout paid for by the top 20%.  I'm not into class envy or worse, class warfare.  We've always been a society that has had it's share of rich and poor.  What has made this country great, probably unique, is the opportunity everyone has to become rich.  If you don't take advantage of all the opportunities this country has to offer, shame on you but don't blame the rich for doing just that.
Aug 13, 2012 7:54PM
avatar
One more bad, bad rich people article.  Only 17,000 more to go before election day.  Got to protect those union (ahem)  "reporter" and Harvard reseacher jobs. 
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.

Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.

ABOUT SMART SPENDING

Smart Spending brings you the best money-saving tips from MSN Money and the rest of the Web. Join the conversation on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

TOOLS

More
MSN Mobile: Go to msn.com in your phone's browser.